Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Artigos

Vol. 5 No. 8 (2018): 1º e 2º Semestres de 2018

A FILOSOFIA ANTI-CARTESIANA DE LEIBNIZ

  • William de Jesus Teixeira
Submitted
April 13, 2026
Published
2019-06-03

Abstract

This papers aims at showing that Leibniz is an ‘anti-Cartesian’ thinker. In light of the criticism Leibniz has adressed to the philosophy of Descartes, we will argue
that Leibniz cannot be ranked among those philosophers traditionally called
‘Cartesians’. In order to attain this goal, we will firstly demonstrate that Leibniz
undermined the metholodogical and the metaphysical grounds of the philosophy of Descartes, ‘cutting’, so to speak, the ‘roots’ of his philosophical system. Next, we will show that Leibniz also attacked vigorously the discipline that Descartes considered the most important of his philosophy: physics or natural philosophy. All these discussions
will illuminate the fact that Leibniz viewed himself as an ‘anti-Cartesian philosopher,
what refute our belief that he was a follower of Descartes.

References

  1. BELAVAL, Yvon. Leibniz critique de Descartes. Paris: Gallimard, 2003.
  2. DESCARTES, René. Oeuvres de Descartes. (publiées par Charles Adam & Paul Tannery, 11 vol.). Paris: Vrin, 1996.
  3. FICHANT, Michel. Da substância individual à mônada. Analytica, Rio de Janeiro, vol. 5, n°1/2, ano 2000. pp. 11-34, jan-dez.
  4. FORLIN, Éneias. A metafísica cartesiana e a fundamentação. da física moderna. Perspectiva filosósica. Recife, Vol. 2, N° 34, ano 2010. pp. 81-95, jul.-dez.
  5. GAUKROGER, Stephen. Descartes’ system of natural philosophy. New York:Cambridge University Press, 2002.
  6. GILSON, Étienne. Études sur le rôle de la pensée mediévale dans la formation du système cartésien. Paris: Librairie Philosophique J. Vrin, 1951.
  7. LEIBNIZ, Georg Wilhelm. Metaphysische abhandlung. Hamburg: Verlag von Felix Meiner, 1962.
  8. LEIBNIZ, Georg Wilhelm. Opera philosophica: quae exstant latina, gallica, germanica omnia. Aalen: Scientia, 1974.
  9. MEDEIROS, Djalma. M. Aristotelismo e mecanicismo na concepção de Leibniz sobre a matéria. (Tese de doutorado) São Paulo: Universidade de São Paulo, 2011.
  10. MOREAU, D. Arnauld contre Malebranche: le polémiste et le méditatif, In:
  11. BOUCHILLOUX, H. et MAC KENNA, A. (eds.). Antoine Arnauld (1612-1694): philosophe, écrivain, théologien. Paris: Bibliothèque Mazarine, 1995, pp. 335-350.
  12. TEIXEIRA, William. A modernidade ‘na’ filosofia de Descartes: a crítica das formas substanciais. Outramargem: revista de filosofia, Belo Horizonte, Vol./Ano 4, n° 6, 2017. pp. 218-229, Jan./Jul.
  13. TEIXEIRA, William. The Metaphysics of Augustine and the foundation of the Cartesian science. Cadernos Espinosanos. São Paulo: n. 37, jul-dez 2017, pp. 291-313.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.