Protagonism in language in judicial familiar mediation

Authors

  • Priscila Fernandes Sant'Anna Universidade Federal de Juiz e Fora ##default.groups.name.author##
  • Paulo Cortes Gago Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ) ##default.groups.name.author##

Keywords:

mediation, talk-in-interaction, narratives, conflict, empowerment

Abstract

This article analyzes, in the scope of Applied Linguistics and in an interactional perspective, the phase called “Historicizing the Conflict”, one of the five phases identified by the research group Interação em Contextos Institucionais as recurrent in a mediation interview. This research analyses how the mediator and the parties in disagreement negotiate the spaces so that the conflict can be elaborated, worked through and transformed by those who seek justice to solve their family issues. The analysis of real talk-in-interaction data shows that formulation, reformulation and co-construction of narratives are the main means of the action of those involved in the context studied, and the identity construction of these actors is accomplished through language. Lastly, as well as the manuals of law postulate and through the study of narratives, we analyzed the empowerment and the exercise of protagonism of the interviewees.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

AUSTIN, J. L. How to do things with words. Oxford: Clarendon, 1962.

BARBOSA, A. A. Guarda compartilhada e mediação familiar: uma parceria necessária. Revista Nacional de Direito de Família e Sucessões, Porto Alegre, v. 1, p. 20-36, 2014.

BRASIL. Lei nº 13.140, de 26 de junho de 2015. Diário Oficial da União, Brasília, DF, 29 jun. 2015.

BECKER, L. A. O mito da neutralidade do juiz.1995. Disponível em: http://www.buscalegis.ufsc.br/revistas/files/anexos/16673-16674-1-PB.htm >. Acesso em: 25 abr. 2016.

BERGER, P.; LUCKMANN, T. A construção social da realidade: tratado de sociologia do conhecimento. Rio de Janeiro: Vozes, 1978.

BILMES, J. Occasioned semantics: a systematic approach to meaning in talk. Human Studies, v. 34, n. 2, p. 129-153, 2011.

CLARK, J.; MISHLER, E. Prestando atenção às histórias dos pacientes: o reenquadre da tarefa clínica. In: RIBEIRO, B. T.; LIMA, C. C.; DANTAS, M. T. L. (Org.). Narrativa, identidade e clínica. Rio de Janeiro: Ipub, 2001. p. 11-53.

DENZIN, N.; LINCOLN, Y. The discipline and practice of qualitative research. In: DENZIN, N.; LINCOLN, Y. The Sage Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, 2000. p. 1-27.

DREW, P.; HERITAGE, J. Talk at work: interaction in institutional settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.

ENFIELD, N. J. Relationship thinking. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.

GARCIA, A. C. The role of interactional competence in mediation. Conflict Resolution Quarterly, v. 28, n. 2, p. 205-228, 2010.

GARFINKEL, H. Studies in Ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1967.

GARFINKEL, H.; SACKS, H. On formal structures of practical actions. In: McKINNEY, J. C.; TERYAKIAN, E. A. (Ed.). Theoretical Sociology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1970. p. 160-193.

GOFFMAN, E. Footing. In: RIBEIRO, B. T.; GARCEZ, P. M. (Org.). Sociolinguística interacional. São Paulo: Loyola, 2002. p. 107-148.

GREATBATCH, D.; DINGWALL, R. The interactive construction of interventions by divorce mediators. In: FOLGER, J. P.; JONES, T. S. (Ed.). New directions in mediation: communication research and perspectives. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications , 1994. p. 84-109.

GRIMSHAW, A. Introduction. In: GRIMSHAW, A. (Ed.). Conflict talk: sociolinguistics investigation of arguments in conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press , 1990. p. 1-20.

GUMPERZ, J. Convenções de contextualização. In: RIBEIRO, B. T.; GARCEZ, P. M. (Org.). Sociolinguística Interacional. 2. ed. Rio de Janeiro: Loyola, 2002. p.149-182.

HERITAGE, J.; WATSON, D. R. Formulations as conversational objects. In.: PASATHAS, G. (Ed.). Everyday language. New York: Irvington, 1979. p. 123-162.

HERITAGE, J.; WATSON, D. R. Aspect of the properties of formulations in natural conversations: some instances analysed. Semiotica, v. 30, n. 3-4, p. 245-262, 1980.

HUTCHBY, Y. Active listening: formulations and the elicitation of feelings-talk in child counseling. Research on Language and Social Interaction, v. 38, n. 3, p. 303-329, 2005.

LABOV, W. The transformation of experience in narrative syntax. In: LABOV, W. Language in the inner city: studies in the black English vernacular. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1972. p. 354-397.

MILES, M. B.; HUBERMAN, A. M. Qualitative data analysis. London: Sage Publications, 1994.

MISHLER, E. G. The discourse of medicine: dialectics of medical interviews. Norwood: Ablex, 1984.

MISHLER, E. G. Research interviewing: context and narrative. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1986.

MISHLER, E. G. Work, identity and narrative: an artist-craftsman’s story. In: ROSENWALD, G. C.; OCHBERG, R. L. (Ed.). Storied lives: the cultural politics of self-understanding. New York: Yale University Press, 1992.

MISHLER. E. Narrative accounts in clinical and research interviews. In: GUNNARSON, B. L.; LINELL, P.; NORDBERG, B. (Ed.) The construction of professional discourse. London: Longman, 1995. p.151-172.

MISHLER. E. Narrativa e identidade: a mão dupla do tempo. In: MOITA LOPES, L. P.; BASTOS, L. C. (Org.). Identidades: recortes multi e interdisciplinares. Campinas: Mercado de Letras, 2002. p. 97-119.

MOITA LOPES, L. P. Pesquisa interpretativista em Linguística Aplicada: a linguagem como condição e solução. Delta, v. 10, n. 2, p. 329-383, 1994.

SACKS, H.; SCHEGLOFF, E. A.; JEFFERSON, G. Sistemática elementar para a organização da tomada de turnos para a conversa. Revista Veredas de Estudos Linguísticos, v. 7, n. 2, p. 1-67, 2003.

SCHEGLOFF, E. Discourse as interactional achievement III: the omni relevance of action. Research on Language and Social Interaction, v. 28, n. 3, p. 185-211, 1995.

SPENGER, F. M. Mediação enquanto política pública: a teoria, a prática e o projeto de lei. Santa Cruz do Sul: Edunisc, 2010.

TANNEN, D.; WALLAT, C. Enquadres interativos e esquemas de conhecimento em interação: exemplos de um exame/consulta médica. In: RIBEIRO, B. T.; GARCEZ, P. M. (Org.). Sociolinguística interacional. São Paulo: Loyola, 2002. p. 183-214.

TEN HAVE, P. Doing conversation analysis: a practical guide. London: Sage, 1999.

VASCONCELOS, C. E. Mediação de conflitos e práticas restaurativas: modelos, processos, ética e aplicações. São Paulo: Método, 2006.

Published

Jan-Fri-2018

Issue

Section

Número temático – Protagonismo na/da linguagem – lançamento em 2017