Implications of the use of sound and image in the evaluation of debriefing

Authors

  • Alessandra Mazzo Universidade de São Paulo, Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto, Departamento de Enfermagem Geral e Especializada, Ribeirão Preto SP , Brazil, Universidade de São Paulo - USP, Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto, Departamento de Enfermagem Geral e Especializada. Ribeirão Preto, SP – Brasil http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5074-8939
  • Juliana Constantino Franzon Universidade de São Paulo, Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto, Departamento de Enfermagem Geral e Especializada, Ribeirão Preto SP , Brazil, Universidade de São Paulo - USP, Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto, Departamento de Enfermagem Geral e Especializada. Ribeirão Preto, SP – Brasil http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9883-9522
  • Mateus Henrique Gonçalves Meska Universidade de São Paulo, Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto, Departamento de Enfermagem Geral e Especializada, Ribeirão Preto SP , Brazil, Universidade de São Paulo - USP, Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto, Departamento de Enfermagem Geral e Especializada. Ribeirão Preto, SP – Brasil http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7855-5450
  • Giovanna Cristina Conti Machado Universidade de São Paulo, Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto, Departamento de Enfermagem Geral e Especializada, Ribeirão Preto SP , Brazil, Universidade de São Paulo - USP, Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto, Departamento de Enfermagem Geral e Especializada. Ribeirão Preto, SP – Brasil http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7906-5880
  • Verónica Rita Dias Coutinho Escola Superior de Enfermagem de Coimbra, Enfermagem Médico-Cirúrgica, Coimbra , Portugal, Escola Superior de Enfermagem de Coimbra, Enfermagem Médico-Cirúrgica. Coimbra – Portugal http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8073-4562
  • Gerson Alves Pereira Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru, Curso de Medicina, Bauru SP , Brazil, USP Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru, Curso de Medicina. Bauru, SP - Brasil http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3920-3000

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5935/1415-2762.20190007

Keywords:

Patient Simulation, Video-Audio Media, Educational Measurement

Abstract

Objective: identify the implication of the application of sound and image resources in the evaluation of debriefing. Method: a quantitative and experimental study that includes undergraduate nursing students aged 18 years and over, randomized by intervention group (participation in debriefing with the use of sound and image) or control group (participation in debriefing without the use of sound and image), carried out at a nursing school in the interior of São Paulo during a workshop simulated, where the students participated in a simulated hi-fidelity scenario.
For the data collection, the sociodemographic characterization instrument was used, the Debriefing Experience Scale and the Debriefing Evaluation associated
with Simulation. For analysis of the data, we used exploratory statistics, with frequency, percentage, reliability test, sample analysis and comparison test of means. Results: 100 undergraduate students in Nursing participated in this study. High values were determined for the evaluation of debriefing and emphasized the importance of the role of the facilitator. However, no significant results were observed for the evaluation of debriefing when adding a video review. Conclusion: these
results highlight the importance of reflection during education based on clinical simulation and suggest that efficient simulation education can be achieved in the
debriefing even when video technology is not available.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Kolbe M, Grande B. Briefing and debriefing during simulation-based training and beyond: content, structure, attitude and setting. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2015[citado em 2016 jan. 28];29(1):87-96. Disponível em: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1521689615000038

Grant JS, Dawkins D, Molhook L, Keltner NL, Vance DE. Comparing the effectiveness of video-assisted oral debriefing and oral debriefing alone on behaviors by undergraduate nursing students during high- fidelity simulation. Nurse Educ Pract. 2014[citado em 2016 jan. 15];14(5):479-84. Disponível em: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24929548.

Clepper TC. Proposing a New Debrief Checklist for Team STEPPS(r) to Improve Documentation and Clinical Debriefing. Simul Gaming. 2016[citado em 2017 mar. 25];47(6):710-9. Disponível em: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1046878116667812

Kolbe M, Marty A, Seelandt J, Graden B. How to debrief teamwork interactions: using circular questions to explore and change team interaction patterns. Adv Simul. 2016[citado em 2017 mar. 25];1(29). Disponível em: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s41077-016-0029-7

Nyström S, Dahlberg J, Edelbring S, Hult H, Dahlgren MA. Debriefing practices in interprofessional simulation with students: a sociomaterial perspective BMC Medic Educ. 2016[citado em 2017 mar. 25];16(148):1- 8. Disponível em: https://bmcmededuc.biomedcentral.com/track/pdf/10.1186/s12909-016-0666-5?site=bmcmededuc.biomedcentral.com

Coutinho VRD, Martins A, Carlos J, Pereira R, Carneiro, MF. Construção e Validação da Escala de Avaliação do Debriefing associado à Simulação (EADaS). Rev Enferm Ref. 2014[citado em 2017 mar. 25];4(2):41-50. Disponível em: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=388239972005

Ha E. Attitudes toward Video-Assisted Debriefing after simulation in undergraduate nursing students: an application of Q methodology. Nurse Educ Today. 2014[citado em 2017 mar. 25];(34)6:978-84. Disponível em: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24467864

Kuehster CR, Hall CD. Simulation: Learning from mistakes while building communication and teamwork. J Nurses Staff Dev. 2010[citado em 2017 mar. 25];26(3):123-7. Disponível em: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20508427

Almeida RGS, Mazzo A, Martins JCM, Coutinho VRD, Jorge, BV, Mendes IAC. Validation to Portuguese of the Debriefing Experience Scale. Rev Bras Enferm. 2016[citado em 2016 ago. 19];69(4):705-11. Disponível em: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-71672016000400705 DOI: 10.1590/0034-7167.2016690413i

Grant JS, Davis LL. Focus on quantitative methods. Selection and use of content expert for instrument development. Res Nurs Health. 1997[citado em 2016 jun. 17];20:269-74. Disponível em: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9179180

Coutinho VRD, Martins JCA, Pereira F. Structured debriefing in nursing simulation: students' perceptions. J Nurs Educ Pract. 2016[citado em 2017 fev. 13];6(9):127-34. Disponível em: http://www.sciedu.ca/journal/index.php/jnep/article/view/8878/5824

Mukaka MM. Statistics Corner: a guide to appropriate uso of correlation coefficient in medical research. Malawi Med J. 2012[citado em 2017 jun. 16];24(3):69-71. Disponível em: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3576830/

Jeffries P, Rizzolo. Designing and implementing models for the innovative use of simulation to teach nursing care of ill adults and children: a national, multi-site, multimethod study (NLN). 2006[citado em 2016 ago. 16];147-59. Disponível em: http://www.nln.org/docs/default-source/professionaldevelopment-programs/read-the-nln-laerdal-project-summary-report-pdf.pdf?sfvrsn=0

Lasater K. Clinical judgment development: Using simulation to create an assessment rubric. J Nurs Educ. 2007[citado em 2016 ago. 16];46(11):496-503. Disponível em: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18019107

Savoldelli GL, Naik VN, Park J, Joo HS, Chow, Hamstra SJ. Value of Debriefing during Simulated Crisis Management: oral versus Video-assisted Oral Feedback. Anesthesiology. 2006[citado em 2017 jan. 12];105(2):279-85. Disponível em: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16871061

McDonnell LK, Jobe KK, Dismukes RKEY. Facilitating LOS debriefings: A training manual. National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Mach, 1997. Disponível em: https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=19970015346

Martins JCA, Mazzo A, Baptista RCN, Coutinho VRD, Godoy S, Mendes IACM, et al. A experiência clínica simulada no ensino de Enfermagem: retrospectiva histórica. Acta Paul Enferm. 2012[citado em 2016 ago. 16];25(4):619-25. Disponível em: http://www.redalyc.org/html/3070/307023889017/

Sawyer T, Sierocka-Castaneda A, Chan D, Berg B, Lustik M, Thompson M. The effectiveness of video-assisted debriefing versus oral debriefing alone at improving neonatal resuscitation performance: a randomized trial. Simul Healthc. 2012[ citado em 2017 jun. 16];7(4): 213-21. Disponível em: https://journals.lww.com/simulationinhealthcare/Abstract/2012/08000/ The_Effectiveness_of_Video_Assisted_Debriefing.2.aspx.

Borges MC, Miranda CH, Santana RC, Bollela VR. Avaliação formativa e feedback como ferramenta de aprendizado na formação de profissionais da saúde. Medicina (Ribeirão Preto). 2014[citado em 2016 ago. 16];47(3): 324-31. Disponível em: https://www.periodicos.usp.br/rmrp/article/view/86685.

Downloads

Published

2019-05-09

Issue

Vol. 23 (2019)

Section

Research

License

Copyright (c) 2019 Reme: Revista Mineira de Enfermagem

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

1.
Implications of the use of sound and image in the evaluation of debriefing. REME Rev Min Enferm. [Internet]. 2019 May 9 [cited 2025 Dec. 13];23. Available from: https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/reme/article/view/49809

Most read articles by the same author(s)