Law as Flow and Duration
Critiquing the Ontology of Sovereignty in Sandro Chignola
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53981/destrocos.v7i2.66660Keywords:
Law, experience, critique, Sandro ChignolaAbstract
Diritto vivente: Ravaisson, Tarde, Hauriou offers a profound reconsideration of the foundational categories of modern legal thought. Rather than understanding law as an expression of sovereignty, state authority, or positive normativity, Sandro Chignola reconstructs the legal phenomenon through the notion of “living law,” conceived as a process immanent to social practices. To accomplish this task, he draws upon three authors who remain relatively marginal within contemporary legal scholarship: Félix Ravaisson, Gabriel Tarde, and Maurice Hauriou. The book demonstrates how habit, repetition, imitation, and institution constitute essential elements for understanding law as a dynamic and historical reality. In Ravaisson, habit emerges as an ontological principle linking nature and action; in Tarde, law arises from networks of imitation and invention that structure social life; in Hauriou, institutions appear as living organisms capable of incorporating temporality and adapting to collective transformations.The principal contribution of the work lies in its critique of sovereignty-centered and normativist approaches. By foregrounding duration, experience, and social creativity, Chignola develops an alternative conception of law that transcends the limits of legal positivism. The result is an original and significant contribution to contemporary legal and political theory, inviting readers to rethink law as an evolving and productive dimension of social life.
Downloads
References
CHIGNOLA, Sandro. Diritto vivente: Ravaisson, Tarde, Hauriou. Macerata: Quodlibet, 2020.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Augusto Jobim do Amaral, Antonio Justino de Arruda Neto

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.








