Vol. 5 No. 1 (2024): Special Dossier – Difference, antagonisms and immanence: Deleuze, Guattari and other schizos (Jan/Jun 2024)
Papers

Introduction to the challenges of 'new censorship'

Isabelle Barbéris
Université Paris Cité, Paris, França
Bio
Fransuelen Geremias Silva
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brasil
Bio
Marco Antônio Sousa Alves
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brasil
Bio

Published 2024-09-27

Keywords

  • censorship,
  • identity,
  • freedom of expression,
  • democracy

How to Cite

BARBÉRIS, I.; SILVA, F. G.; ALVES, M. A. S. Introduction to the challenges of ’new censorship’. (Des)troços: revista de pensamento radical, Belo Horizonte, v. 5, n. 1, p. e51964, 2024. DOI: 10.53981/destroos.v5i1.51964. Disponível em: https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/revistadestrocos/article/view/51964. Acesso em: 21 nov. 2024.

Abstract

In the text "Introduction to the Challenges of 'New Censorship'", Isabelle Barbéris explores the distinctive features of contemporary forms of censorship. She highlights that these new forms of censorship are broader and more diffuse, emanating not only from the State, but also from social groups and individuals. Furthermore, they are often based on identity and political criteria, aiming to protect minority groups or specific ideologies. The author discusses the "protective" function of censorship, suggesting that in "new censorship", the protection of groups may be more a matter of visibility than of defending legitimate interests. She also addresses the complexity of these forms of censorship, which often operate indirectly, through mechanisms such as self-censorship and control of meaning, or even within a context of information overload. To support her arguments, Barbéris draws on the theories of authors such as Michel Foucault and Pierre Bourdieu, who contributed to a critique of traditional censorship. She concludes by emphasizing the importance of understanding these new forms of censorship in order to protect artistic freedom and strengthen democracy.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. BOURDIEU, Pierre. La Censure. In: BOURDIEU, Pierre. Questions de sociologie. Paris: Les Éditions de Minuit, 1980. pp. 138-142.
  2. BOURDIEU, Pierre. Une science qui dérange. In: BOURDIEU, Pierre. Questions de sociologie. Paris: Les Éditions de Minuit, 1980. pp. 19-36.
  3. BOUVERESSE, Jacques. Prodiges et vertiges de l’analogie. Paris : Raisons d’agir, 2022.
  4. BRUNI, Frank. The Dangerous Safety of College. New York Times, 11 mar. 2017. Disponível em: https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/ll/opini. Acesso em: 28 fev. 2024.
  5. BRUYÈRE, Claire; TOUILLIER-FEYRABEND, Henriette. La censure et ses masques. Ethnologie française, v. 36, n. 1, pp. 5-9, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/ethn.061.0005
  6. BURGÉLIN, Olivier. Censure et société. Communications, v. 9, p. 122-148, 1967. Disponível em: https://www.persee.fr/doc/comm_0588-8018_1967_num_9_1_1134. Acesso em: 28 fev. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3406/comm.1967.1134
  7. BUTLER, Judith. Censure implicite et puissance d’agir discursive. In: BUTLER, Judith. Le pouvoir des mots : discours de haine et politique du performatif (Excitable Speech). Paris: Éditions Amsterdam, 2004. pp. 201-252.
  8. CARTER, Stephen L. The Ideology Behind Intolerant College Students. Bloomberg, 6 mar. 2017. Disponível em: https://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2017-03-06/the-ideology-behind-intolerant-college-students . Acesso em: 28 fev. 2024.
  9. CHEMERINSKY, Erwin; GILLMAN, Howard. Free speech on campus. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1bvnfnb
  10. DERSHOWITZ, Alan M. America’s New Censors. Horizons. Journal of International Relations and Sustainable Development, n. 19, pp. 202-221, 2021.
  11. ESQUERRE, Arnaud. Les affres de la disparition de la censure. Communications, v. 2020, n. 106, pp. 147-159, 2020. DOI: 10.3917/commu.106.0147. Disponível em: https://www.cairn.info/revue-communications-2020-1-page-147.htm. Acesso em: 28 fev. 2024 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/commu.106.0147
  12. FOUCAULT, Michel. Dits et écrits, volume 1 (1954-1975). Paris : Gallimard, 2001.
  13. FOUCAULT, Michel. Dits et écrits, volume 2 (1976-1988). Paris : Gallimard, 2001.
  14. FRIEDERSDORF, Conor. The Glaring Evidence that Free Speech is Threatened on Campus. Atlantic, v. 4, mar. 2016. Disponível em: https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/03/theglaring-evidence-that-free-speech-is-threatened-on-campus/471825/. Acesso em: 28 fev. 2024.
  15. HAMOU, Philippe. Descartes : le théâtre des passions. Études, v. 1, 2002. Disponível em: http://journals.openedition.org/episteme/8418. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/episteme.8418. Acesso em: 28 fev. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/episteme.8418
  16. LAGEIRA, Jacinto; TRICOIRE, Agnès; VÉRON, Daniel. L’Oeuvre face à ses censeurs: le guide pratique de l’observation de la liberté de création. M Médias, 2020.
  17. LEFEBVRE, Henri. Critique de la vie quotidienne. Paris: l'Arche Editeur, 1958.
  18. LUKIANOFF, Greg; HAIDT, Jonathan. The Coddling of the American Mind: How Good Intentions and Bad Ideas Are Setting Up a Generation for Failure. New York: Penguin, 2018.
  19. MARTIN, Laurent. Censure répressive et censure structurale : comment penser la censure dans le processus de communication ? Questions de communication, n. 15, 2009, pp. 67-78. Disponível em: http://journals.openedition.org/questionsdecommunication/461. Acesso em: 28 fev. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/questionsdecommunication.461
  20. MARTIN, Laurent. Penser les censures dans l'histoire. Sociétés & Représentations, v. 21, n. 1, pp. 331-345, 2006. Disponível em: https://www.cairn.info/revue-societes-et-representations-2006-1-page-331.htm. Acesso em: 28 fev. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/sr.021.0331
  21. MÉTAIS-CHASTANIER, Barbara. La censure par le populaire. Gestions populistes de l’art et de la culture, Agon, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/agon.3127
  22. MURAT, Laure. Qui annule quoi ? Libelle. Paris: Seuil, 2022.
  23. RAMPELL, Catherine. Free Speech Is Flunking Out on College Campuses. Washington Post, 22 out. 2015. Disponível em: https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/free-speech-is-flunking-out-on-college-campuses/2015/10/22/124e7cd2-78f5-11e5-b9c1-f03c48c96ac2_story.html. Acesso em: 28 fev. 2024.
  24. SCHREIER, Lise. De l'art de civiliser les filles: idéologie domestique et politique coloniale dans le roman édifiant des débuts de la Troisième République. Romantisme, v. 2014, n. 165, pp. 13-20, 2014. DOI: 10.3917/rom.165.0013. Disponível em: https://www.cairn.info/revue-romantisme-2014-3-page-13.htm. Acesso em: 28 fev. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/rom.165.0013
  25. YALE'S Little Robespierres. Wall Street Journal, 9 nov. 2015. Disponível em: https://www.wsj.com/articles/yales-little-robespierres-1447115476 . Acesso em: 28 fev. 2024.