Vol. 3 Núm. 2 (2022): Dossier - Desobediencias (jul/dic 2022)
Dossier especial

Cómo resistir al populismo autoritario

PDF (Português (Brasil))
  • William E. Scheuerman,
  • Bárbara Nascimento de Lima
William E. Scheuerman
Indiana University, Bloomington, Estado Unidos da América
Biografía
Bárbara Nascimento de Lima
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brasil
Biografía
DOI: https://doi.org/10.53981/(des)troos.v3i2.44293

Publicado 2023-04-18

Palabras clave

  • autoritarismo,
  • Desobediência civil,
  • resistência civil,
  • não-violência,
  • populismo,
  • protesto,
  • desobediência não-civil,
  • violência
    • ...Más
    Menos

Cómo citar

SCHEUERMAN, W. E.; LIMA, B. N. de. Cómo resistir al populismo autoritario. (Des)troços: revista de pensamento radical, Belo Horizonte, v. 3, n. 2, p. 82–103, 2023. DOI: 10.53981/(des)troos.v3i2.44293. Disponível em: https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/revistadestrocos/article/view/44293. Acesso em: 17 jul. 2024.

Derechos de autor 2023 William E. Scheuerman; Bárbara Nascimento de Lima

Creative Commons License

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial 4.0.

Resumen

El populismo autoritario presenta grandes desafíos a la democracia. Sin embargo, relativamente pocos análisis político-teóricos o filosóficos se han centrado en la mejor forma de oponerse o resistir a él. El presente ensayo se dedica a tres posibles enfoques que, en este momento, están siendo discutidos provisionalmente. Algunos escritores enfatizan las posibles virtudes de la desobediencia civil, otros defienden una estrategia aún más amplia de resistencia civil, y otros, aún más, abandonan ambos enfoques "civiles" a favor de la desobediencia no civil. A pesar de sus muchos puntos fuertes, cada enfoque tiene puntos débiles, en parte porque cada uno responde de manera incompleta a los desafíos del populismo autoritario y al uso de modos cada vez más comunes de represión "inteligente". Con implicaciones siniestras para aquellos preocupados por el destino de la democracia, los populistas están adoptando técnicas coercitivas destinadas a reprimir la disidencia sin generar la simpatía del público o una reacción popular.

PDF (Português (Brasil))

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Citas

  1. CHENOWETH, Erica; STEPHAN, Maria J. Violence is a dangerous route for protestors: activists’ voices have to be heard first on protest tactics. Foreign Police, 18 dez. 2019. Disponível em: https://foreignpolicy.com/2019/12/18/violent-resistance-protests-nonviolence/ Acesso em 22 dez. 2022.
  2. CHENOWETH, Erica. Civil resistance: what everyone needs to know. New York: Oxford University Press, 2021.
  3. CHENOWETH, Erica. Civil resistance. In: KURTZ, Lester R.; SMITHEY, A. Lee. (eds.). The paradox of repression and nonviolent movements. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press, 2018.
  4. DAHL, Robert. On democracy. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1998.
  5. DAPIRON, Anthony. City on fire: the fight for Hong Kong. Melbourne: Scribe Publishing, 2020.
  6. DELMAS, Candice. A duty to resist: when civil disobedience should be uncivil. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018.
  7. DELMAS, Candice. Civil Disobedience. Philosophy Compass, v. 11, 2016.
  8. DELMAS, Candice. Uncivil disobedience in Hong Kong. Boston Review, 13 jan. 2020. Disponível em: http://bostonreview.net/global-justice/candice-delmas-uncivil-disobedience-hong-kong. Acesso em 15 dez. 2022.
  9. GERBAUDO, Paolo. The digital party: political organization and online democracy. London: Pluto, 2019.
  10. HAINES, Herbert H. Black Radicalism and the Civil Rights Mainstream, 1954-1970. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press, 1988.
  11. HAMBY, Peter. New poll shows Trump’s Black Lives Matter protest response could cost him 2020. Vanity Fair, July 24, 2020). Disponível em: https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2020/07/polling-trumps-protest-response-could-cost-him-2020. Acesso em 02 dez. 2022.
  12. HIRSCHMANN, Nancy J. Populism and protest. Frontiers in Sociology, v. 5, pp. 1-5, 2021.
  13. JÖRKE, Dirk; SELK, Veith. Theorien des Populismus zur Einführung. Hamburg: Junius, 2017.
  14. JUBB, Rob. Disaggregating political authority: what’s wrong with Rawlsian political authority? Political Studies, v. 67, n. 04, 2019.
  15. KADIVAR, Mohammad Al; KETCHLEY, Neil. Sticks, stones, and molotov cocktails: unarmed collective violence and democratization. Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World, v. 4, n. 3, 2018.
  16. KEANE, John. The new despotism. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2020.
  17. KURTZ, Lester R.; SMITHEY, A. Lee. “Smart” repression. In: KURTZ, Lester R.; SMITHEY, A. Lee. (eds.). The paradox of repression and nonviolent movements. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press, 2018.
  18. LEHOUCQ, Fabrice. Does nonviolence work?. Comparative Politics, v. 48, n. 2, pp. 269-287.
  19. MARKOVITS, Daniel. Democratic disobedience. Yale Law Journal, v. 114, pp. 1897-1952, 2004/2005.
  20. MOUFFE, Chantal. For a left populism. New York: Verso, 2018.
  21. MUIRHEAD, Russel; ROSENBLUM, Nancy L. A lot of people are saying: the new conspiracism and the assault on democracy. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2019.
  22. MÜLLER, Jan-Werner. Democracy rules. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2021.
  23. MÜLLER, Jan-Werner. What is Populism? (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2016.
  24. NIKAZMERAD, Nicholas. A chronological survey of the Iranian Revolution. Iranian Studies, v. 13, n. 1-4, pp. 327-368, 1980.
  25. RAWLS, John. A theory of justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1971.
  26. REVELLI, Marco. The new populism: democracy stares into the abyss. New York: Verso, 2019.
  27. ROBERTS, Adam; ASH, Timothy Garton. (eds.). Civil resistance and power politics: the experience of non-violent action from Gandhi to the present. New York: Oxford University Press, 2011.
  28. SCHEDLER, Andreas. Democratic reciprocity. Journal of Political Philosophy, v. 29, n. 2, 2021.
  29. SCHEDLER, Andreas. The politics of uncertainty: sustaining and subverting electoral authoritarianism. New York: Oxford University Press, 2013.
  30. SCHEUERMAN, William E. (ed.). Cambridge companion to civil disobedience. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2021.
  31. SCHEUERMAN, William E. Civil Disobedience. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2018.
  32. SCHEUERMAN, William E. Donald Trump meets Carl Schmitt. Philosophy & Social Criticism, v. 45, n. 9-10, pp. 1170-1185, 2019.
  33. SCHEUERMAN, William E. Politically motivated property damage. Harvard Review of Philosophy, v. 28, pp. 1-18, 2021.
  34. SCHEUERMAN, William E. Whistleblowing as civil disobedience. In: SCHEUERMAN, William E. (ed.). Cambridge companion to civil disobedience. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2021.
  35. SCHEUERMAN, William E. Why not Uncivil Disobedience?. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, ahead of print, 2019. Disponível em: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs /10.1080/13698230.2019.1693158. Acesso em 19 dez. 2022.
  36. SCHOCK, Kurt. Civil resistance today. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2015.
  37. SCHOCK, Kurt. Unarmed insurrections: people power movements in nondemocracies. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2005.
  38. SHARP, Gene. The politics of nonviolent action. V. I-III. Boston: Porter Sargent, 1973.
  39. URBINATI, Nadia. Democracy disfigured. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2014.
  40. URBINATI, Nadia. Me the people: how populism transforms democracy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2019.