v. 3 n. 2 (2022): Dossiê - Desobediências (jul/dez 2022)
Dossiê especial

Como resistir ao populismo autoritário

PDF
  • William E. Scheuerman,
  • Bárbara Nascimento de Lima
William E. Scheuerman
Indiana University, Bloomington, Estado Unidos da América
Biografia
Bárbara Nascimento de Lima
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brasil
Biografia
DOI: https://doi.org/10.53981/(des)troos.v3i2.44293

Publicado 18-04-2023

Palavras-chave

  • autoritarismo,
  • Desobediência civil,
  • resistência civil,
  • não-violência,
  • populismo,
  • protesto,
  • desobediência não-civil,
  • violência
    • ...Mais
    Menos

Como Citar

SCHEUERMAN, W. E.; LIMA, B. N. de. Como resistir ao populismo autoritário. (Des)troços: revista de pensamento radical, Belo Horizonte, v. 3, n. 2, p. 82–103, 2023. DOI: 10.53981/(des)troos.v3i2.44293. Disponível em: https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/revistadestrocos/article/view/44293. Acesso em: 17 jul. 2024.

Copyright (c) 2023 William E. Scheuerman; Bárbara Nascimento de Lima

Creative Commons License

Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Resumo

O populismo autoritário impõe grandes desafios à democracia. No entanto, relativamente pouca análise sistemática político-teórica ou filosófica se concentrou na melhor forma de se opor ou resistir a ele. O presente ensaio se dedica a três abordagens possíveis que, no momento, estão sendo provisoriamente discutidas. Alguns escritores enfatizam as possíveis virtudes da desobediência civil, outros defendem uma estratégia ainda mais ampla de resistência civil e outros, ainda, abandonam ambas as abordagens “civis” em favor da desobediência não-civil. Apesar de seus muitos pontos fortes, cada abordagem possui pontos fracos, em parte porque cada uma responde de forma incompleta aos desafios do populismo autoritário e ao uso de modos cada vez mais comuns de repressão “inteligente”. Com implicações sinistras para aqueles preocupados com o destino da democracia, os populistas estão adotando técnicas coercitivas destinadas a reprimir a dissidência sem gerar a simpatia do público ou uma reação popular.

PDF

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Referências

  1. CHENOWETH, Erica; STEPHAN, Maria J. Violence is a dangerous route for protestors: activists’ voices have to be heard first on protest tactics. Foreign Police, 18 dez. 2019. Disponível em: https://foreignpolicy.com/2019/12/18/violent-resistance-protests-nonviolence/ Acesso em 22 dez. 2022.
  2. CHENOWETH, Erica. Civil resistance: what everyone needs to know. New York: Oxford University Press, 2021.
  3. CHENOWETH, Erica. Civil resistance. In: KURTZ, Lester R.; SMITHEY, A. Lee. (eds.). The paradox of repression and nonviolent movements. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press, 2018.
  4. DAHL, Robert. On democracy. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1998.
  5. DAPIRON, Anthony. City on fire: the fight for Hong Kong. Melbourne: Scribe Publishing, 2020.
  6. DELMAS, Candice. A duty to resist: when civil disobedience should be uncivil. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018.
  7. DELMAS, Candice. Civil Disobedience. Philosophy Compass, v. 11, 2016.
  8. DELMAS, Candice. Uncivil disobedience in Hong Kong. Boston Review, 13 jan. 2020. Disponível em: http://bostonreview.net/global-justice/candice-delmas-uncivil-disobedience-hong-kong. Acesso em 15 dez. 2022.
  9. GERBAUDO, Paolo. The digital party: political organization and online democracy. London: Pluto, 2019.
  10. HAINES, Herbert H. Black Radicalism and the Civil Rights Mainstream, 1954-1970. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press, 1988.
  11. HAMBY, Peter. New poll shows Trump’s Black Lives Matter protest response could cost him 2020. Vanity Fair, July 24, 2020). Disponível em: https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2020/07/polling-trumps-protest-response-could-cost-him-2020. Acesso em 02 dez. 2022.
  12. HIRSCHMANN, Nancy J. Populism and protest. Frontiers in Sociology, v. 5, pp. 1-5, 2021.
  13. JÖRKE, Dirk; SELK, Veith. Theorien des Populismus zur Einführung. Hamburg: Junius, 2017.
  14. JUBB, Rob. Disaggregating political authority: what’s wrong with Rawlsian political authority? Political Studies, v. 67, n. 04, 2019.
  15. KADIVAR, Mohammad Al; KETCHLEY, Neil. Sticks, stones, and molotov cocktails: unarmed collective violence and democratization. Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World, v. 4, n. 3, 2018.
  16. KEANE, John. The new despotism. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2020.
  17. KURTZ, Lester R.; SMITHEY, A. Lee. “Smart” repression. In: KURTZ, Lester R.; SMITHEY, A. Lee. (eds.). The paradox of repression and nonviolent movements. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press, 2018.
  18. LEHOUCQ, Fabrice. Does nonviolence work?. Comparative Politics, v. 48, n. 2, pp. 269-287.
  19. MARKOVITS, Daniel. Democratic disobedience. Yale Law Journal, v. 114, pp. 1897-1952, 2004/2005.
  20. MOUFFE, Chantal. For a left populism. New York: Verso, 2018.
  21. MUIRHEAD, Russel; ROSENBLUM, Nancy L. A lot of people are saying: the new conspiracism and the assault on democracy. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2019.
  22. MÜLLER, Jan-Werner. Democracy rules. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2021.
  23. MÜLLER, Jan-Werner. What is Populism? (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2016.
  24. NIKAZMERAD, Nicholas. A chronological survey of the Iranian Revolution. Iranian Studies, v. 13, n. 1-4, pp. 327-368, 1980.
  25. RAWLS, John. A theory of justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1971.
  26. REVELLI, Marco. The new populism: democracy stares into the abyss. New York: Verso, 2019.
  27. ROBERTS, Adam; ASH, Timothy Garton. (eds.). Civil resistance and power politics: the experience of non-violent action from Gandhi to the present. New York: Oxford University Press, 2011.
  28. SCHEDLER, Andreas. Democratic reciprocity. Journal of Political Philosophy, v. 29, n. 2, 2021.
  29. SCHEDLER, Andreas. The politics of uncertainty: sustaining and subverting electoral authoritarianism. New York: Oxford University Press, 2013.
  30. SCHEUERMAN, William E. (ed.). Cambridge companion to civil disobedience. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2021.
  31. SCHEUERMAN, William E. Civil Disobedience. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2018.
  32. SCHEUERMAN, William E. Donald Trump meets Carl Schmitt. Philosophy & Social Criticism, v. 45, n. 9-10, pp. 1170-1185, 2019.
  33. SCHEUERMAN, William E. Politically motivated property damage. Harvard Review of Philosophy, v. 28, pp. 1-18, 2021.
  34. SCHEUERMAN, William E. Whistleblowing as civil disobedience. In: SCHEUERMAN, William E. (ed.). Cambridge companion to civil disobedience. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2021.
  35. SCHEUERMAN, William E. Why not Uncivil Disobedience?. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, ahead of print, 2019. Disponível em: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs /10.1080/13698230.2019.1693158. Acesso em 19 dez. 2022.
  36. SCHOCK, Kurt. Civil resistance today. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2015.
  37. SCHOCK, Kurt. Unarmed insurrections: people power movements in nondemocracies. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2005.
  38. SHARP, Gene. The politics of nonviolent action. V. I-III. Boston: Porter Sargent, 1973.
  39. URBINATI, Nadia. Democracy disfigured. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2014.
  40. URBINATI, Nadia. Me the people: how populism transforms democracy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2019.