Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
##common.pageHeaderLogo.altText##

Artigos

Vol. 7 No. 1 (2021): Outros mundos: novas subjetividades, novos métodos

Between multi-scalar and trans-scalar approaches: Convergences between Critical Urban Theory and Urban Assemblage

Submitted
December 24, 2021
Published
2021-12-24

Abstract

In the field of Urban Studies, there is an evident need to rethink the scope of investigative methods due to the multiple transformations of contemporary urban life. The objective of this article is to expose in a dialogic way the notion of scale from the Critical Urban Theory and Urban Assemblage, especially linked to the Actor-Network Theory. The text  highlights possible implications when adopting multi- or trans-scalar theoretical-methodological approaches in Urban Studies. In this sense, we present the main divergences, possible convergences and complementarities between them.

References

  1. ACUTO, M. Putting ANTs into the mille-feuille. City: analysis of urban trends, culture, theory, policy, action, 15(5), p. 552–562, Outubro, 2011.
  2. ANGELO, H. (2011) Hard-wired experience, City: analysis of urban trends, culture, theory, policy, action, 15(5), p. 570-576, Outubro, 2011.
  3. BLOK, A.; FARÍAS, I.; ROBERTS, C. (Org.). The Routledge Companion to Actor-Network Theory, 1 ed., Nova York: Routledge, 2020.
  4. BRENNER, N. The limits to scale? Methodological reflections on scalar structuration. Progress in Human Geography, 25(4), p. 591-614, Novembro 2001.
  5. BRENNER, N. New Urban Spaces: Urban Theory and the Scale Question. New York: Oxford University Press, 2019.
  6. BRENNER, N.; MADDEN, D. J.; WACHSMUTH, D. Assemblage urbanism and the challenges of critical urban theory. City: analysis of urban trends, culture, theory, policy, action, 15(2), p. 225–240, Junho, 2011.
  7. CALLON, M. Some elements of a sociology of translation: domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of Saint Brieuc Bay. In: LAW, J. (ed.) Power, Action and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge? Sociological Review Monograph. London: Routledge, p. 196–233, 1986.
  8. CASTELLS, Manuel. A questão urbana. Rio de Janeiro: Paz e Terra, 2000.
  9. DOVEY, K. Uprooting critical urbanism. City: analysis of urban trends, culture, theory, policy, action, 15(3–4), p. 347–354, 2011.
  10. FÄRBER, A. How does ANT help us to rethink the city and its promises? In: BLOK, A.; FARÍAS, I.; ROBERTS, C. (Org.). The Routledge Companion to Actor-Network Theory, 1 ed., Nova York: Routledge, p. 264-272, 2020.
  11. FARÍAS, I. Introduction: Decentring the object of urban studies. In: FARÍAS, I; BENDER, T. (Org.). Urban assemblages: how actor-network theory changes urban studies, 1 ed. Nova York: Routledge, p. 1 - 20, 2010.
  12. FARÍAS, I. The politics of urban assemblages. City: analysis of urban trends, culture, theory, policy, action,, 15(3-4), p. 365–374. Jul, 2011.
  13. FARÍAS, I; BENDER, T. (Org.). Urban assemblages: how actor-network theory changes urban studies, 1 ed. Nova York: Routledge, 2010.
  14. HARVEY, D. A justiça social e a cidade. São Paulo: Hucitec, 1980.
  15. HEROD, A. Scale: The local and the global. In: CLIFFORD, N.; HOLLOWAY, S. et al. Key concepts in geography. SAGE, p. 217-235, 2008.
  16. Latour, B. Where are the missing masses? Sociology of a few mundane artefacts. In:
  17. BIJKER, W.; LAW, J. [Eds.]. Shaping Technology, Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change. Cambridge: MIT Press, p. 225–258, 1992.
  18. ______. Jamais fomos modernos: ensaio de antropologia simétrica. Tradução de Carlos Irineu da Costa. 1. Ed. Rio de Janeiro: Editora 34, 1994.
  19. ______. On actor-network theory: A few clarifications plus more than a few complications. Soziale Welt, vol. 47, p. 369-381, 1996.
  20. _____. Entrevista com Bruno Latour. Revista Cult. [Entrevista concedida a] FIORINI, M. São Paulo, n.132, p. 14-20, Fevereiro, 2009. Disponível em: <https://revistacult.uol.com.br/home/entrevista-bruno-latour/>. Acessado em 23 Maio 2020.
  21. ______. Reagregando o Social: uma introdução à teoria do Ator-Rede. Salvador/Bauru: EDUFBA/EDUSC, 2012.
  22. LATOUR, B; WOOLGAR, S. A Vida de Laboratório: a produção dos fatos científicos. Relume Dumará: Rio de Janeiro, 1997.
  23. LEFEBVRE, H. A Revolução Urbana. Belo Horizonte, UFMG, 2002.
  24. MARSTON, S. A.; JONES III, J. P.; WOODWARD, K. Human geography without scale. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 30(4), p. 416–32, Dezembro, 2005.
  25. MCFARLANE, C. Assemblage and critical urbanism. City: analysis of urban trends, culture, theory, policy, action, 15(2), p. 204–224, Junho, 2011a.
  26. ______. On Context. City: analysis of urban trends, culture, theory, policy, action, 15(3–4), p. 375–388, Junho-Agosto, 2011b.
  27. ______. Translocal assemblages: Space, power and social movements. Geoforum, 40(4), p. 561–567, 2009.
  28. OPPENHEIM, R. How does the South Korean city of Kyŏngju help ANT think place and scale? In: BLOK, A; FARÍAS, I; ROBERTS, C [ed.]. The Routledge Companion to Actor-Network Theory. Routledge: New York, p. 318-327, 2020.
  29. RANKIN, K. Assemblage and the politics of thick description, City: analysis of urban trends, culture, theory, policy, action, 15(5), p. 563-569, Outubro, 2011.
  30. ROSA, M. How to stage a convergence between ANT and Southern sociologies? In: BLOK, A.; FARÍAS, I.; ROBERTS, C. (Org.). The Routledge Companion to Actor-Network Theory, 1 ed., Nova York: Routledge, p. 210-219, 2020.
  31. RUSSELL, B.; PUSEY, A.; CHATTERTON, P. What can an assemblage do? City: analysis of urban trends, culture, theory, policy, action, 15(5), p. 577-583, Outubro, 2011.
  32. SIMONE, A-M. The surfacing of urban life. City: analysis of urban trends, culture, theory, policy, action, 15(3–4), p. 355–364, Junho-Agosto, 2011.
  33. SMITH, N. Uneven Development: Nature, Capital and the Production of Space. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1984.
  34. TONKISS, F. Template urbanism, City: analysis of urban trends, culture, theory, policy, action, 15(5), p. 584-588, Outubro, 2011.
  35. WASCHMUTH, D.; MADDEN, D.; BRENNER, N. Between abstraction and complexity, City: analysis of urban trends, culture, theory, policy, action, 15(6), p. 740-750, Dezembro, 2011.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.