Work process of nurses in the reception with risk rating
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5935/1415-2762.20160039Keywords:
Emergency Medical Services, Emergency Nursing, User Embracement, Working ConditionsAbstract
Objective: to describe the nursing work process in the Reception with Risk Rating (RRR) in the Emergency Unit of a municipality in Minas Gerais. Methods: qualitative case study in which data were collected through semi-structured interviews with nurses and submitted to thematic content analysis. Results: the main purpose of the work process in the RRR was identified as giving priority to patients who are under high clinical risk, and also providing guidance and clarification to users and verifying clinical exams. In relation to the object of the work process, this was related to complaints from users and their articulation with tools and knowledge on professional practice. Sensibility was recognized as necessary in the relationship between professionals and users, as this increases the quality of the listening. Knowledge, as a soft-hard technology, was recognized as an extension of the professional, able to direct the care. Hard technologies were also mentioned. All professionals of the institution were pointed as agents of the rating process and the nurse was emphasized as the classifier. The final product of the work was not conceived as something finished and materializable as an object, but as the actual implementation of the assistance that is consumed when it is produced. Conclusion: there are inter-relational elements and technologies in the nursing work process of RRR. There is an interdisciplinary potential, subjectivities and contextual situations that pervade the scenario and require improvements in their work process.
Downloads
References
Mackway-Jones K, Marsden J, Windle J. Emergency Triage/Manchester Triage Group. In: Welfane JrC, Mafra AA. Sistema Manchester de Classificação de Risco. São Paulo: Editora Grupo Brasileiro de Classificação de Risco; 2010.
Silva LG, Matsuda LM. Um olhar para a qualidade no processo de atendimento em um serviço de urgência público. Ciênc Cuid Saúde. 2012[citado em 2012 nov. 12];11:121-8. Disponível em: http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/CiencCuidSaude/article/view/17063/pdf
Merhy EE. Saúde: a cartografia do trabalho vivo. 3ª ed. São Paulo: Hucitec; 2002.
Littike D, Sodré F. A arte do improviso: o processo de trabalho dos gestores de um Hospital Universitário Federal. Ciênc Saúde Coletiva. 2015[citado em 2016 mar. 17];20(10):3051-62. Disponível em: http://www.scielosp.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-81232015001003051&lng=en
Inoue KC, Marassaki ACY, Bellucci JAJ, Rossi RM, Martinez YDE, Matsuda LM. Acolhimento com classificação de risco: avaliação da estrutura, processo e resultado. REME - Rev Min Enferm. 2015[citado em 2016 mar. 17];19(1):13-20. Disponível em: http://www.reme.org.br/artigo/detalhes/982
Yin RK. Estudo de caso: planejamento e métodos. 5ª ed. Porto Alegre: Bookman; 2015.
Bardin L. Análise de conteúdo. 4ª ed. Lisboa: Edições 70; 2013.
Ministério da Saúde (BR). Secretaria-Executiva, Núcleo Técnico da Política Nacional de Humanização. Acolhimento com avaliação e classificação de risco: um paradigma ético-estético no fazer em saúde. Brasilia (DF): Ministério da Saúde; 2004.
Cavalcante RB, Rates HF, Silva LTC, Mello RA, Dayrrel KMB. Acolhimento com classificação de risco: proposta de humanização nos serviços de urgência. Rev Enferm Cent O Min. 2012[citado em 2016 mar. 17];2(3):428-37. Disponível em: http://www.seer.ufsj.edu.br/index.php/recom/article/view/288
Koh HK, Brach C, Harris LM, Parchman ML.A proposed 'health literate care model' would constitute a systems approach to improving patients' engagement in care. Health Aff (Millwood). 2013[citado em 2016 mar. 17];32(2):357-67. Disponível em: http://content.healthaffairs.org/content/32/2/357.full.pdf+htmlDOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.1205.
Sousa TSA, Uzêda M, Almeida MS, Nunes IMC, Moreira M. Acolhimento com classificação de risco: a voz das mulheres. Rev Baiana Enferm. 2013[citado em 2016 mar. 17];27(3):212-20. Disponível em: http://www.portalseer.ufba.br/index.php/enfermagem/article/view/8347
Franco TB, Merhy EE. El reconocimiento de la producción subjetiva del cuidado. Salud Colectiva. 2011[citado em 2016 mar. 17];7(1):9-20. Disponível em: http://www.scielo.org.ar/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1851-82652011000100002
Alves M, Rocha TB, Ribeiro HCTC, Gomes GG, Meneses BMJ. Specificities of the nursing work in the mobile emergency care service of Belo Horizonte. Texto Contexto Enferm. 2013[citado em 2016 mar. 17];22(1):208-15. Disponível em: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-07072013000100025&lng=en
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2017 Reme: Revista Mineira de Enfermagem

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


































