Heel prick test:

humanization of healthcare provided to newborns

Authors

  • Ellen Dayane Cargnin Pimente Universidade Estadual de Maringá – UEM, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Enfermagem. Maringá, PR – Brasil. Enfermeira, Mestranda
  • Geisa do Santos Luz Universidade Estadual de Maringá – UEM, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Enfermagem. Maringá, PR – Brasil. Enfermeira, Mestre.
  • Gina Bressan Schiavon Universidade Estadual de Maringá – UEM, Departamento de Medicina. Maringá, PR – Brasil. Médica. Mestre em Ciências da Saúde, Professora.
  • Sandra Marisa Pelloso Universidade Estadual de Maringá – UEM, Departamento de Enfermagem, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Enfermagem. Maringá, PR – Brasil. Professora associada
  • Maria Dalva de Barros Carvalho Universidade Estadual de Maringá – UEM, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências da Saúde, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Enfermagem. Maringá, PR – Brasil. Professora associada

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5935/2316-9389.2010.v14.50495

Keywords:

Neonatal Screening, Humanization of Assistance, Child Health

Abstract

JUSTIFICATION: The goal of the exam offered by the National Program of Neonatal Screening is to screen, diagnose and treat birth-defect diseases. Just one blood sample collection is recommended for each newborn (NB), and it should be repeated in case of evidence of any disease. In some health services a new blood collection is necessary due to factors such as: first collection made before the recommended time, error in collection or in preparing the samples or in the shipping time. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the care provided to NBs and their families when collecting material for the 'Heel Prick Test', in a university hospital located in northwest Parana. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This is a transverse observational study. Population: all the babies born in the University Hospital of Maringá-UEM between September/2006 and October/2007, plus the hospitalized patients who were screened in the period. RESULTS: The sample was composed by 975 NBs including 110 (11.3%) patients recruited for new blood collection. The highest index of recruitment for new blood collection occurred in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (n=72; 65.5%), followed by Obstetrics and Gynecology (n=20; 18.2%), Semi-intensive Care Unit (n=11; 10%) and Pediatrics (n=7; 6.3%). CONCLUSIONS: The high number of 2nd, 3rd and 4th blood collections without registration of the reasons shows the need to reflect about humanizing healthcare. On one side these recollections hurt the baby and the family, physically and emotionally; on the other side, they affect the nursing professional, who may need a specific training to gain more confidence and, thus, more resources to provide a humanized and effective care

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Ministério da Saúde (BR). Portaria GM/MS n° 822/GM de 06/06/2001. Brasília (DF): Ministério da Saúde; 2001.

2. Silva MBGM, Domingos MT, Witting EO. Manual de normas técnicas para coleta do sangue no teste do pezinho. Elaborado pela Fundação Ecumênica de Proteção ao Excepcional. Curitiba; 2004.

3. Carvalho MDB, Pelloso SM, Higarashi IH, Luz GS. Cobertura do programa de triagem neonatal em Maringá (PR), 2001 a 2006. Maringá; 2006.

4. Sociedade Brasileira de Triagem Neonatal SBTN. Triagem Neonatal. Anápolis; 2006. [Citado 2007 jul. 12]. Disponível em: http://www.sbtn.org.br.

5. Silva MMBG, Lacerda MR. “Teste do pezinho”: por que coletar na alta hospitalar. Rev Eletrônica Enferm. 2003; 5(2): 50-4.

6. Ministério da Saúde (BR). Secretaria de Assistência à saúde. Coordenação-Geral de Atenção Especializada. Manual de normas técnicas e rotinas operacionais do Programa Nacional de Triagem Neonatal. 2ª ed. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde; 2005.

Published

2010-03-01

Issue

Section

Research

How to Cite

1.
Pimente EDC, Luz G do S, Schiavon GB, Pelloso SM, Carvalho MD de B. Heel prick test:: humanization of healthcare provided to newborns. REME Rev Min Enferm. [Internet]. 2010 Mar. 1 [cited 2026 Oct. 16];14(1). Available from: https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/reme/article/view/50495

Most read articles by the same author(s)