Published 2025-05-14
Keywords
- Homo sacer,
- potentiality,
- state of exception,
- happy life
Copyright (c) 2025 Vanja Grujic

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
Abstract
Placed between constituent and constituted power, homo sacer reveals the state of exception, which through sovereign ban, is kept both inside and outside the law. Agamben’s latest political and legal philosophy is based upon this concept. As the victim of sovereignty, homo sacer unfolds the paradox of sovereign power, criticizing its fundamentals and showing the emptiness of law. However, for potentiality which is at the centre of Agamben’s argument, we need to look not only outside sovereignty and sovereign power, but also outside homo sacer. This article aims to examine such space, arguing that through absolute potentiality, the fulfilment of law is possible with the content to be focused on reaching conditions of justice and happy life.
Downloads
References
- AGAMBEN, Giorgio. A comunidade que vem. Trad. Cláudio Oliveira. Belo Horizonte: Autêntica, 2013.
- AGAMBEN, Giorgio. Homo sacer: sovereign power and bare life. Stanford: Stanford University, 1998.
- AGAMBEN, Giorgio. Potentialities: collected essays in philosophy. Stanford: Stanford University, 1999.
- AGAMBEN, Giorgio. Profanations. New York: Zone Books, 2007.
- AGAMBEN, Giorgio. State of exception. Chicago: University of Chicago, 2003.
- AGAMBEN, Giorgio. The time that remains: a commentary on the letter to the Romans. Stanford: Stanford University, 2005.
- BADIOU, Alain. Saint Paul: the foundation of universalism. Stanford: Stanford University, 2003.
- BENJAMIN, Walter. Illuminations. Trad. Harry Zohn. New York: Schocken Books, 2007.
- BULTMANN, Rudolf. Theology of the New Testament: v. 2. Waco: Baylor University, 2007.
- COMISSÃO TEOLÓGICA INTERNACIONAL. A esperança de salvação para crianças que morrem sem batismo. Città del Vaticano: Santa Sé, 2007. Disponível em: https://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/cti_documents/rc_con_cfaith_doc_20070419_un-baptised-infants_po.html.
- DELEUZE, Gilles. Essays critical and clinical. London: Verso, 1998.
- DERRIDA, Jacques. The beast and the Sovereign: v. 2. Chicago: University of Chicago, 2011.
- DONAHUE, Luke. Erasing differences between Derrida and Agamben. Oxford Literary Review, Oxford, v. 35, n. 1, pp. 25–45, 2013.
- GRUJIC, Vanja. Law as affirmation of love and freedom. Ágoras: Revista Científica do G-Teia, v. 2, n. 1, pp. 64–72, 2022.
- MILLS, Catherine. Playing with law: Agamben and Derrida on postjuridical justice. South Atlantic Quarterly, Durham, v. 107, n. 1, pp. 15–36, 2008.
- MILOVIC, Miroslav. Direito como potência. São Paulo: Editora Metrics, 2023.
- SCHMIDT, Philipp. Der Terminus “Ausnahmezustand” nach Carl Schmitt in der Konzeption Giorgio Agambens: eine vergleichende Analyse. München: GRIN Verlag, 2004/2005.
- SCHMITT, Carl. Political theology: four chapters on the concept of sovereignty. Chicago: University of Chicago, 2005.
- WHYTE, Jessica. “I would prefer not to”: Giorgio Agamben, Bartleby and the potentiality of the law. Law and Critique, v. 20, pp. 309–324, 2009.