Cartografias do impensado
três leituras críticas da obra de Eduardo Lourenço. Entrevista com Francisco Noa,Guilherme D’ Oliveira Martins e Eduardo Sterzi
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35699/2317-2096.2025.59229Keywords:
Eduardo LourençoAbstract
A entrevista, realizada pelos professores Margarida Calafate Ribeiro (CES, Portugal); Roberto Vecchi (UNIBO, Itália) e Sabrina Sedlmayer (UFMG, Brasil), teve como propósito convidar três críticos reconhecidos por seus trabalhos acadêmicos acerca da obra do filósofo português Eduardo Lourenço. Procuraram, com o objetivo de explorar visões distintas, espaços geográficos e culturais diferentes: África, Europa e Brasil. Elegeram cinco perguntas idênticas e as dirigiram para a Francisco Noa (Moçambique); Guilherme de Oliveira Martins (Portugal) e Eduardo Sterzi (Brasil). O resultado foi um texto denso e crítico, capaz de revelar chaves de leitura que auxiliarão os leitores a compreenderem a heterodoxia do pensamento do Eduardo Lourenço.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Sabrina Sedlmayer, Roberto Vecchi , Margarida Calafate Ribeiro (Autor)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).