Announcements

  • CALL FOR PAPERS - v. 35, n. 3 (2025): Comedy: from classics to modernity

    2024-06-05

    CHAMADA ALETRIA - v. 35, n. 3 (jul. - set. 2025) 

    Organizers:

    Elen de Medeiros (UFMG), Rodrigo Alves Nascimento (UFBA)

    Deadline for submission of proposals: December 4, 2024.

     

    Comedy: from classics to modernity

     

    Both underestimated and difficult to grasp, comedy is a genre that has undergone historical transformations in its poetic constitution. Aristotle stated that comedy deals with the “imitation of inferior people” (p. 67), and several scholars have been analyzing the excerpt since. Many of them have taken it as the reason for a historical underestimation of the genre, but Cleise Furtado Mendes (2008, p. 49) observes in her study on the forms of comedy that “Aristotle cannot be considered the ‘origin’ of the critical demotion of which it was a victim”. After all, in Poetics itself, the philosopher argued that: “The successive changes through which tragedy passed, and the authors of these changes, are well known, whereas comedy has had no history because it was not at first treated seriously.” (p. 67). Actually, in drama theory, studies dedicated to comedy are scarce and uneven, even though dramaturgical production is fruitful and always present. It is not surprising that many historians and theater critics would not hesitate to say that comedy of manners was undoubtedly the most flourishing genre in Brazil in the 19th century and played a decisive role in the origins of what was called “Brazilian national dramaturgy.”

    On the other hand, investigations on comedy and laughter are no less complex, and perhaps only in the last two centuries, they have become objects of interest in very different fields, such as medicine, anthropology, history, and philosophy. Overall, although many insist on the search for universal rules, the fact is that comicality and the meanings of laughter cannot handled regardless of contextualization and social dimension.

    In this sense, we invite researchers to think about comedy and comicality both in their tradition and in the light of modern and contemporary transformations. Perhaps even more than tragedy or “serious dramas”, comedy has benefited from rich changes and adaptations throughout history, producing a broad tradition of subgenres: high and low comedy, burlesque, comedy of characters, of manners, cloak and sword comedy, heroic and melodramatic comedies... or even: farces, vaudevilles, and tragicomedies. Therefore, papers that address the genre in its formal constitution or merged by other dramaturgical patterns, from Brechtian epic theater to slapstick comedy, or papers that seek to understand different theatrical comic texts, will be accepted. Aletria also receives texts in a continuous flow, for the “Varia” section, interviews, and reviews.

     

    References:

     

    ARISTÓTELES. Poética. Edição bilingue. Tradução, introdução e notas de Paulo Pinheiro. São Paulo: Ed. 34, 2015.

    MENDES, Cleise Furtado. A gargalhada de Ulisses: a catarse na comédia. São Paulo: Perspectiva/Salvador: Fundação Gregório de Mattos, 2008.

     

     

     

    Comedy: from classics to modernity

     

     

    Both underestimated and difficult to grasp, comedy is a genre that has undergone historical transformations in its poetic constitution. Aristotle stated that comedy deals with the “imitation of inferior people” (p. 67), and several scholars have been analyzing the excerpt since. Many of them have taken it as the reason for a historical underestimation of the genre, but Cleise Furtado Mendes (2008, p. 49) observes in her study on the forms of comedy that “Aristotle cannot be considered the ‘origin’ of the critical demotion of which it was a victim”. After all, in Poetics itself, the philosopher argued that: “The successive changes through which tragedy passed, and the authors of these changes, are well known, whereas comedy has had no history because it was not at first treated seriously.” (p. 67). Actually, in drama theory, studies dedicated to comedy are scarce and uneven, even though dramaturgical production is fruitful and always present. It is not surprising that many historians and theater critics would not hesitate to say that comedy of manners was undoubtedly the most flourishing genre in Brazil in the 19th century and played a decisive role in the origins of what was called “Brazilian national dramaturgy.”

    On the other hand, investigations on comedy and laughter are no less complex, and perhaps only in the last two centuries, they have become objects of interest in very different fields, such as medicine, anthropology, history, and philosophy. Overall, although many insist on the search for universal rules, the fact is that comicality and the meanings of laughter cannot handled regardless of contextualization and social dimension.

    In this sense, we invite researchers to think about comedy and comicality both in their tradition and in the light of modern and contemporary transformations. Perhaps even more than tragedy or “serious dramas”, comedy has benefited from rich changes and adaptations throughout history, producing a broad tradition of subgenres: high and low comedy, burlesque, comedy of characters, of manners, cloak and sword comedy, heroic and melodramatic comedies... or even: farces, vaudevilles, and tragicomedies. Therefore, papers that address the genre in its formal constitution or merged by other dramaturgical patterns, from Brechtian epic theater to slapstick comedy, or papers that seek to understand different theatrical comic texts, will be accepted. Aletria also receives texts in a continuous flow, for the “Varia” section, interviews, and reviews.

     

    References:

     

    ARISTÓTELES. Poética. Edição bilingue. Tradução, introdução e notas de Paulo Pinheiro. São Paulo: Ed. 34, 2015.

    MENDES, Cleise Furtado. A gargalhada de Ulisses: a catarse na comédia. São Paulo: Perspectiva/Salvador: Fundação Gregório de Mattos, 2008.

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Read more about CALL FOR PAPERS - v. 35, n. 3 (2025): Comedy: from classics to modernity
  • CALL FOR PAPERS - v. 35, n. 2 (2025): James Joyce and Virginia Woolf: Experiences, Limits and Redefinition of Modernism

    2024-03-04

    Aletria: Revista de Estudos de Literatura

     

    James Joyce and Virginia Woolf: Experiences, Limits and Redefinition of Modernism.

    Organizers: André Cabral de Almeida Cardoso (UFF), Daniel Reizinger Bonomo (UFMG), Júlia Braga Neves (UFRJ), Luciana Villas Bôas (UFRJ) e Thiago Rhys Bezerra Cass (USP).

    Deadline for submission of proposals: September 4, 2024.

     

    Virginia Woolf (1882-1941) and James Joyce (1882-1941) are omnipresent names in the history of fiction in the first decades of the twentieth century. The formal self-consciousness in their novels and short stories, marked by undeniable rhetorical density and deliberate exploration of new compositional possibilities, seems to simultaneously determine and satisfy the recurring correlation between modernism and what has come to be called “aesthetic of difficulty” (Diepeveen, 2003; Hunter 2012), invested in confronting and subverting the practices and mores of the “common reader” – to use a category mobilized by Woolf herself – that pertain to nineteenth century realist conventions. Almost one hundred years after the initial recognition of their works, it is relevant to reflect upon the grounds of the analyses that affiliate technical experimentation with modernism and assume the public’s disorientation. This interpretive tradition of modernist texts has hitherto determined an approach to Woolf’s and Joyce’s works that associates them with the effects of epiphany, stream of consciousness, instabilities of point of view and spatial form (cf. McGurl, 2011; Drewery, 2016). Nevertheless, Woolf’s and Joyce’s fiction also offer elements that invite us to reflect upon the historicity of the texts’ reception, of reading practices and also of literary theory itself. Ulysses (1922) and Jacob’s Room (1922), The Waves (1931) and Finnegans Wake (1939) question constitutive elements of the novel as a genre. They blur the boundaries among multiple novelistic subgenres, stress the materiality of print, postulate narrative as a means of knowledge and dialogue with the political and national predicaments of literary tradition. They also bring to the fore themes that deal with the impasses between local and cosmopolitan dimensions in a polyphonic and, at times, plurilingual textual fabric that imposes great challenges for translation. In this number of Aletria, we welcome contributions exploring the historicity of the experience of reading and, especially, the rereading of Woolf’s and Joyce’s fiction that deals with the redefinition or even the rediscovery of approaches that their works, with their extensive outreach, demand or preclude. In this sense, we seek to reevaluate reading practices concerning both authors’ works, going beyond those readings that have already been consolidated by their critical fortune and interrogating them from a new cultural and theoretical context. We welcome articles that contemplate thematic and formal elements in Woolf’s and Joyce’s works, their relationship with different literary genres, their essayist production, correspondence and diaries, as well as comparative studies between Woolf and Joyce and other writers.

     

    Bibliography
    DIEPEVEEN, Leonard. The Difficulties of Modernism. New York, London: Routledge, 2003.
    DREWERY, Claire. “The Modernist Short Story: Fractured Perspectives”. In: HEAD, Dominic (ed.). The Cambridge History of the English Short Story. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016, pp. 135-151.
    HUNTER, Andrew. “The Short Story and the Difficulty of Modernism”. In: SACIDO, Jorge (ed.). Modernism, Postmodernism and the Short Story in English. Amsterdam, New York: Rodopi, 2012, pp. 29-46.
    McGURL, Mark. The Program Era: Postwar Fiction and the Rise of Creative Writing. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2009.

    Read more about CALL FOR PAPERS - v. 35, n. 2 (2025): James Joyce and Virginia Woolf: Experiences, Limits and Redefinition of Modernism
  • Aletria solves problem to submit articles to the dossier " Nature e violence"

    2022-05-03

    Recentemente, a Aletria: Revista de Estudos de Literatura foi notificada da impossibilidade de submeter artigos ao Dossiê: Natureza e violência, uma vez que esta opção não aparecia no processo de submissão.

    Informamos que o problema foi corrigido e já é possível enviar trabalhos ao dossiê.

    Lembramos ainda que o prazo para submissões se encerra em 15 de junho de 2022.

    Agradecemos a compreensão de todos.

    Read more about Aletria solves problem to submit articles to the dossier " Nature e violence"