xasperating Bartleby: Formula – Allegory – Reticence

Authors

  • João Pedro Cachopo Universidade Nova de Lisboa

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17851/2317-2096.24.3.11-23

Keywords:

Bartleby, Melville, formula, allegory, politics, literature, philosophy

Abstract

The present essay discusses the so-called “Bartleby effect” in its literary, philosophical and political dimensions, while bringing into account the readings of Melville’s novel offered by Blanchot, Deleuze, Agamben, Hardt, Negri, Zize&k, among other authors. I distinguish two procedures – one following the thread of the “formula”, the other of the “allegory” – and show how they may either converge or diverge in the abovementioned readings. The final “reticence” expresses a critical concern as regards the relationship between literature and politics. On account of realizing both the difficulties in articulating the “formulaic” and the “allegorical” procedures, and the prevalence of a certain messianism, when that articulation seems to succeed, I suggest that recognizing the “politics of literature” cannot – and should not – be equated with transforming any literary character and/or formula into an emblem of politics.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

João Pedro Cachopo, Universidade Nova de Lisboa

João Pedro Cachopo estudou musicologia e filosofia em Lisboa (FCSH-UNL), Paris (Université de Paris 8) e Berlim (Humboldt Universität zu Berlin), tendo-se doutorado em filosofia contemporânea com uma dissertação sobre o pensamento estético de Adorno. É investigador do CESEM/FCSH-UNL, onde lecciona e desenvolve um projecto de pós-doutoramento sobre os aspectos estéticos e políticos da relação entre as artes. Departamento: CESEM/FCSH-UNL. Áreas de investigação: Filosofia (estética e política); estudos literários; musicologia.

 

References

AGAMBEN, Giorgio. Bartleby, or On Contingency. In: AGAMBEN, Giorgio. Potentialities: Collected Essays in Philosophy. Edição e tradução de Daniel Heller-Roazen. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1999. p. 243-271.

BENJAMIN, Walter. Sobre o conceito de história. In: BENJAMIN, Walter. O anjo da história. Edição e tradução de João Barrento. Lisboa: Assírio & Alvim, 2010. p. 9-20.

BERKMAN, Gisèle. L’effet Bartleby. Philosophes lecteurs. Paris: Hermann, 2011.

BLANCHOT, Maurice. L’écriture du désastre. Paris: Gallimard, 1980.

DELEUZE, Gilles. Bartleby, ou la formule. In: DELEUZE, Gilles. Critique et clinique. Paris: Minuit, 1993. p. 89-114.

DERRIDA, Jacques. Donner la mort. Paris: Galilée, 1999.

Hardt, Michael; NEGRI, Antonio. Empire. Cambridge (MA); London: Harvard University Press, 2001.

JAWORSKI, Philippe. Le désert et l’empire. Paris: Presses de l’École Normale Supérieure, 1986.

MELVILLE, Herman. Bartleby. Tradução de Gil de Carvalho. 2. ed. Lisboa: Assírio & Alvim, 2010.

RANCIÈRE, Jacques. Deleuze, Bartleby et la formule littéraire. In: RANCIÈRE, Jacques. La chair des mots. Politiques de l’écriture. Paris: Galilée, 1998. p. 179-203.

ZIZEK, Slavoj. The Paralax View. Cambridge (MA); London: MIT Press, 2009.

ZOURABICHVILI, François. Deleuze et le possible (de l’involontarisme en politique). In: ALLIEZ, Éric (Org.). Deleuze, une vie philosophique. Paris: PUF, 1998. p. 335-357.

Published

2014-12-31

How to Cite

Cachopo, J. P. (2014). xasperating Bartleby: Formula – Allegory – Reticence. Aletria: Revista De Estudos De Literatura, 24(3), 11–23. https://doi.org/10.17851/2317-2096.24.3.11-23

Issue

Section

Dossiê - Políticas do Contemporâneo - Experiências