A recepção crítica do projeto editorial da Field Day Anthology of Irish Writing
Anathemata, beatification or canonization lurking in a biographical note
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35699/2317-2096.2021.25040Palabras clave:
Field Day Anthology of Irish Writing, Antologias, Projeto editorial, Recepção crítica, Estudos irlandesesResumen
Verdadeiro evento editorial, a publicação de três volumes da Field Day Anthology of Irish Writing (1991) foi extensivamente resenhada em jornais de ampla circulação e periódicos da Irlanda, Reino Unido e EUA. Com objetivos indissociáveis das tensões políticas acerca do status político da Irlanda do Norte antes do Acordo de Paz de 1998, os volumes I a III foram alvo de amplo escrutínio por parte de jornalistas e críticos. Foram aqui selecionadas resenhas que abordam questões caras aos estudos editoriais e que raramente figuram na imprensa popular, como vieses de seleção, autoridade do aparato crítico, discurso editorial e materialidade dos livros. Concluímos que a reação à publicação original nos anos 1990 foi diretamente responsável pela edição de mais volumes publicados em 2002 e reflete mudanças da percepção do papel do projeto editorial em antologias nacionais.
Descargas
Citas
ADAMS, Thomas R.; BAKER, Nicolas. A Potencie of Life: Books in Society. London: British Library, 2001.
BATTERSBY, Eileen. Field Day and the Writing Tradition. The Irish Times, Dublin, 4 jan. 1992. The arts, p. 5.
BOURDIEU, Pierre. As regras da arte: gênese e estrutura do campo literário. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras, 1996.
BOURKE, Angela et al (ed.). The Field Day Anthology of Irish Writing, v. 4-5: Irish Women’s Writing and Traditions. Cork; Nova York: Cork University Press; Field Day, 2002.
DARNTON, Robert. “What Is the History of Books?” Revisited. Modern Intellectual History, Cambridge, v. 4, n. 3, p. 495-508, 2007. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1017/S1479244307001370
DEANE, Ciarán. Brian Friel’s Translations: The Origins of a Cultural Experiment. Field Day Review, Dublin, v. 5, p. 6-47, 2009.
DEANE, Seamus et al. (ed.). The Field Day Anthology of Irish Writing. Derry; Nova York: Field Day; Norton, 1991. v. 1-3
EAGLETON, Terry et al. Nationalism, Colonialism and Literature. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1990.
EGGERT, Paul. The Work and the Reader in Literary Studies: Scholarly Editing and Book History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1017/9781108641012.
FIELD DAY THEATRE COMPANY. Ireland’s Field Day. Londres: Hutchinson, 1985.
FOSTER, R. F. Nations, yet Again: Constructing or Deconstructing an Irish Canon?. Times Literary Supplement, Dublin, v. 10, n. 4643, p. 5-7, 27 mar. 1992.
FOSTER, R. F. On Seamus Heaney. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2020. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1515/9780691211473.
GAILEY, Amanda. Proofs of Genius: Collected Editions from the American Revolution to the Digital Age. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2015. DOI: http://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv65sx4r.
GILBERT, Susan; GUBAR, Sandra. The Madwoman in the Attic: The Woman Writer and the Nineteenth-Century Literary Imagination. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1979.
GREETHAM, David. A History of Textual Scholarship. In: FRAISTAT, Neil; FLANDERS, Julia (org.). The Cambridge Companion to Textual Scholarship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013. p. 16-41. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1017/CCO9781139044073.002.
GREG, W. W. Bibliography: An Apologia. In: GREG, W.W. Collected Papers. Edição de J. C. Maxwell. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1966.
HOWARD, Ben. Gael and gall. Sewanee Review, Sewanee, v. 101, n. 1, p. 131-137, 1993.
KEARNEY, Richard. Puns, Ambiguities and Polyphonies. The Sunday Tribune, Dublin, 1 dez. 1991. Books, p. 2.
KILFEATHER, Siobhan. The Whole Bustle. London Review of Books, Londres, v. 14, n. 1, 9 jan. 1992. Disponível em: https://www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v14/n01/siobhan-kilfeather/the-whole-bustle. Acesso em: 29 ago. 2020.
LERNOUT, Geert. Continental Editorial Theory. In: FRAISTAT, Neil; FLANDERS, Julia (org.). The Cambridge Companion to Textual Scholarship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013. p. 61-78. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1017/CCO9781139044073.004.
LONGLEY, Edna. Belfast Diary. London Review of Books, Londres,
v. 14, n. 1, 9 jan 1992. Disponível em: https://www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v14/n01/edna-longley/belfast-diary. Acesso em: 29 ago. 2020.
McKENZIE, D. F. Bibliography and the Sociology of Texts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511483226.
PELLETIER, Martine. Un acte de définition: L’enterprise anthologique selon Field Day. In: GENET, Jacqueline et al (org.). Le livre en Irlande: L’imprimé en contexte. Caen: Presses Universitaires de Caen, 2013.
p. 227-250. DOI: http://doi.org/10.4000/books.puc.935.
REIMAN, D. H. Gender and Documentary Editing: A Diachronic Perspective. TEXT: Transactions of the Society for Textual Scholarship, Ann Arbor, MI, v. 4, p. 351-359, 1988.
SHILLINGSBURG, Peter L. From Gutenberg to Google: Electronic Representations of Literary Texts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511617942.
SUTHERLAND, Kathryn. Anglo-American Editorial Theory. In: FRAISTAT, Neil; FLANDERS, Julia (org.). The Cambridge Companion to Textual Scholarship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013. p. 42-60. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1017/CCO9781139044073.003.
TÓIBÍN, Colm. Confusion of Literary Traditions. Sunday Independent, Dublin, 24 nov. 1991, p. 8.
VAN MIERLO, Wim. Annotation and Commentary in the Modernist Edition: A critique. Modernist Cultures, Edimburgo, v. 15, n. 1, p. 69-91, 2020. DOI: http://doi.org/10.3366/mod.2020.0280.
WARREN, Michelle R. The Politics of Textual Scholarship. In: FRAISTAT, Neil; FLANDERS, Julia (org.). The Cambridge Companion to Textual Scholarship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013. p. 119-134. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1017/CCO9781139044073.007.
YEATS, W. B. The Collected Letters of W. B. Yeats: volume 1, 1865-1895. Edição de John Kelly e Eric Domville. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1986.
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2021 Maria Rita Drumond Viana, Vinicius Garcia Valim (Autor)
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
