Os Kafkas de Coetzee
A última lição de Elizabeth Costello
Palabras clave:
Kafka, Coetzee, Elizabeth Costello, parábola, romance contemporâneo], parable, contemporary novelResumen
Resumo: O propósito deste artigo é sugerir que “No portão”, o capítulo final de Elizabeth Costello, de J. M. Coetzee, não apenas se apropria de “Diante da lei”, de Kafka, mas também reconfigura, de modo bem menos evidente, um outro texto do escritor, “Das parábolas”. Para tanto, depois de examinar a enigmática parábola e algumas de suas leituras críticas, busca-se mostrar como a “lição” de Coetzee também traça, em chave ficcional, um amplo comentário sobre as distinções entre “este lado” e “do outro lado” e sobre a afirmação de que toda a parábola, no fundo, quer apenas dizer que o “inexplicável é inexplicável” e que, ao fazer isso, também discute as relações entre literatura e conhecimento.
Palavras-Chave: Kafka; Coetzee; Elizabeth Costello; parábolas; romance contemporâneo.
Abstract: The purpose of this article is to suggest that “At the Gate,” the final chapter of J.M. Coetzee’s Elizabeth Costello, is not just appropriating Kafka’s “Before the Law”, but is also reconfiguring, in a much less obvious way, another of his texts, “On Parables”. Therefore, after examining the enigmatic parable and some of its critical readings, we seek to show how Coetzee’s “lesson” also draws, in a fictional key, a broad commentary on the distinctions between “this side” and “the other side” and the statement that the parable, in the end, just means that the “inexplicable is inexplicable” and that, in doing so, it also discusses the relations between literature and knowledge.
Keywords: Kafka; Coetzee; Elizabeth Costello; parable; contemporary novel.
Descargas
Citas
AGAMBEN, Giorgio. Defesa de Kafka contra os seus intérpretes. In: AGAMBEN, G. Ideia da prosa. Tradução de João Barrento. Lisboa: Cotovia, 1999. p. 135-136.
AGAMBEN, Giorgio. Il fuoco e il racconto. Milão: Nottetempo, 2014a.
AGAMBEN, Giorgio. Nudez. Tradução de Davi Pessoa. Belo Horizonte: Autêntica, 2014b.
AGAMBEN, Giorgio. O fogo e o relato. Tradução de Andrea Santurbano e Patricia Peterle. São Paulo: Boitempo, 2018.
ATTRIDGE, Derek. J. M. Coetzee and the Ethics of Reading. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2004a.
ATTRIDGE, Derek. The Singularity of Literature. New York: Routledge, 2004b.
BETHLEHEM, Louise. Elizabeth Costello as post-apartheid text. In: BOEHMER, E.; EAGLESTONE, R.; IDDIOLS, K. (Org.). J.M. Coetzee in Context and Theory. Londres: Continuum, 2009. p. 20-35.
COETZEE, John Maxwell. Elizabeth Costello. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras, 2003.
CROSSAN, John Dominic. Raid the Articulate. Oregon: Wipf and Stock, 2008.
GRAY, Richard T. (Ed.). Franz Kafka Encyclopedia. Connecticut: Greenwood, 2005.
GRAY, Richard T. Constructive Destruction: Kafka’s Aphorisms: Literary Tradition and Literary Transformation. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag, 1987.
HANSEN, João Adolfo. Alegoria, construção e interpretação da metáfora. Campinas: Hedra: Editora da Unicamp, 2006.
HOMERO. Odisseia. Tradução de Carlos Alberto Nunes. Rio de Janeiro: Ediouro, 2001.
JOHNSON, Gary. The Vitality of Allegory: Figural Narrative in Modern and Contemporary Fiction. Ohio: University of Ohio Press, 2012.
KAFKA, Franz. Parábolas e fragmentos. Tradução de João Barrento. Lisboa: Assírio e Alvim, 2012.
KAFKA, Franz. Um médico rural – pequenas narrativas. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras, 1999.
KERMODE, Frank. The Genesis of Secrecy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1979.
MEDIN, Daniel. Three Sons: Franz Kafka and the Fiction of J.M. Coetzee, Philip Roth, and W.G. Sebald. Illinois: Northwestern University Press, 2010.
MILLER, J. Hillis. Parábolas e performativos nos evangelhos e na literatura moderna. In: MILLER, J. H. A ética da leitura. Rio de Janeiro: Imago, 1995. p. 177-197.
MOSCA, Valéria. “A Purgatory of Clichés”: Elizabeth Costello and the Impossible Paradise for Writers. Altre modernitá, Milão, v. 7, p. 126-138, 2012.
NASCIMENTO, Evando. Literatura no século 21: expansões, heteronomias, desdobramentos. Revista Brasileira de Literatura Comparada, Rio de Janeiro, v. 18, n. 28, 2016.
NAVEH, Gila Safran. Biblical Parables and Their Modern re-Creations. New York: State University of New York Press, 2000.
PIPPIN, Robert Buford. Philosophical Fiction? On J.M. Coetzee’s Elizabeth Costello. In: MEHIGAN, T.; MOSER, C. (Org.). The intellectual landscape in the works of J.M. Coetzee. Rochester: Camden House, 2018. p. 294-310.
POLITZER, Heinz. Franz Kafka, Parable and Paradox. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1962.
SHARKEY, E. Joseph. “On Parables”: the Value of Already Knowing that the Incomprehensible is Incomprehensible. In: SHARKEY, E. J. Idling the Engine: Linguistic Skepticism in and Around Cortazar, Kafka, and Joyce. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 2006. p. 156-189.
THIHER, Allen. Franz Kafka: a Study of the Short Fiction. Woodbridge: Twayne, 1990.
WOOD, Michael. Kafka’s China and the Parable of Parables. Philosophy and Literature, Baltimore, v. 20, n. 2, p. 325-336, 1996.
WOOD, Michael. Literature and the Taste of Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.
Archivos adicionales
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2022 ADRIANO SCHWARTZ (Autor)
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by/4.0/88x31.png)
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).