A 'mise en abyme' como recurso eniano nos anais
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.17851/2317-2096.19.3.47-56Mots-clés :
Ênio, Anais, mise en abyme, Annals.Résumé
Resumo: No fragmento 22 do primeiro canto dos Anais (ed. Valmaggi), Quinto Ênio (239—ca. 169 a.C.) apresenta a sua versão da concepção dos gêmeos Rômulo e Remo, numa cena em que a narrativa do poeta contém o discurso de Ília, mãe dos gêmeos, recém-acordada de um sonho bastante agitado. Na fala de Ília, insere-se a fala do seu pai, um discurso dentro de outro discurso. O procedimento do récit enchâssé cria um efeito de mise en abyme que tem especial relevância para a leitura interpretativa do fragmento, por sua vez criador de uma segunda mise en abyme nos Anais. Outro sonho narrado no primeiro canto, o de Ênio com Homero (fr.2-8), liga-se ao de Ília também pela mise em abyme, gerando novas leituras intratextuais.
Palavras-chave: Ênio; Anais; mise en abyme.
Abstract: In fragment 22 from the first book of the Annals (ed. Valmaggi), Quintus Ennius (239–ca. 169 BC) provides us with his version of the twins’ Romulus and Remus conception, in a scene in which the poet’s narrative contains the twins’ mother’s speech, Ilia’s, the description of the dream she’s just had. In Ilia’s line, we hear her father speak–a speech within a speech. This récit enchâssé produces the effect of a mise en abyme that bears special relevance to the interpretative reading of the fragment, which in its turn creates a second mise en abyme through its insertion in the Annals. Narrated in the first book, another dream, in which Ennius sees Homer (fragments 2-8), is also connected to Ilia’s through the mise en abyme’s effect, thus generating new intratextual reading possibilities.
Keywords: Ennius, Annals, Mise en abyme.
Téléchargements
Références
BAYET, Jean. Littérature latine. Paris: Librairie Armand Colin, 1969.
CICERO. De Senectute, De Amicitia, De Diuinatione. With an English translation by William Armistead Falconer. Cambridge/ Massachussetts/ London: Harvard University Press and William Heinemann Ltd:, 1979. 568 p.
COURTNEY, Edward. The Fragmentary Latin Poets. New York: Oxford University Press, 2003. 540 p.
DÄLLENBACH, Lucien. Le récit spéculaire: essai sur la mise en abyme. Paris: Éditions du Seuil, 1977. 247 p.
DÄLLENBACH, Lucien. Intertexto e autotexto. In: ______. “Poétique”: intertextualidades. Trad. Clara Crabbé Rocha. Coimbra: Livraria Almedina, 1979. v. 27. p. 51-76.
DÄLLENBACH, Lucien; TOMARKEN, Annette. Reflexivity and Reading. New Literary History, v. 11, n. 3, “On Narrative and Narratives”: II, p. 435-449, Spring 1980.
DOMINIK, William J. From Greece to Rome: Ennius’ Annales. In: BOYLE, A. J. (Ed.). Roman Epic. London / New York: Routledge, 1993. p. 37-58.
ELLIOTT, Jacqueline. The Voices of Ennius Annals. In: FITZGERALD, William; GOWRS, Emily (Ed.). Ennius perennis. The Annals and Beyond. Cambridge Classical Journal. Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society. Supplementary Volume 31. Cambridge: CUP, 2007.
HARRIS, W. V. Roman Opinions About the Truthfulness of Dreams. The Journal of Roman Studies, v. 93, p. 18-34, 2003.
HEFFERNAN, James A. W. Museum of Words: The Poetics of Ekphrasis from Homer to Ashbery. Chicago/ London: The University of Chicago Press, 1993. 249 p.
MARTINS, Nilce Sant’Anna. Introdução à estilística: a expressividade na língua portuguesa. 3. ed. São Paulo: T. A. Queiroz, 2000. 259 p.
MARTOS, Juan. Ennio: Fragmentos. Madrid: Editorial Gredos, 2006. 567 p.
MORENO, Manuel Segura. Quinto Ennio. Fragmentos. Madrid: Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, 1999. 159 p.
NATIVIDADE, Everton da Silva. Os Anais de Quinto Ênio: estudo, tradução e notas. São Paulo, Universidade de São Paulo (Dissertação policopiada). 264 p.
NÓBREGA, Vandick Londres da. A epopéia de Ênio: exegese e crítica. Rio de Janeiro, Universidade do Brasil (tese policopiada), 1963. 110 p.
PATTERSON, Lee W. Rapt With Pleasaunce: Vision and Narration in the Epic. ELH, v. 48, n. 3, p 455-475, 1981.
PEREIRA, Maria Helena da Rocha. Estudos de história da cultura clássica. II Volume – Cultura Romana. 3. ed. Lisboa: Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian, 2002. 580 p.
SKUTSCH, Otto. The Annals of Quintus Ennius. New York: Oxford University Press, 1985. 848 p.
SOUZA, Sebastião Gonçalves de. Fragmentos de Névio e Ênio. Rio de Janeiro, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (tese policopiada), 1989. 286 p.
STEUART, Ethel Mary. The Annals of Quintus Ennius. Hildesheim / New York: Georg Holms Verlag, 1976. 246p.
VALMAGGI, Luigi (Ed.). Q. Ennio: I frammenti degli Annali. Torino: Casa Editrice Giovanni Chiantore, 1945. 163 p.
VASCONCELLOS, Paulo Sérgio de. Efeitos intertextuais na Eneida de Virgílio. São Paulo: Humanitas, 2001. 400 p.
WARMINGTON, E. H. (Ed.). Remains of Old Latin. Cambridge, Massachusetts, London: Harvard University Press, 1988. v. 1. 598 p.
Téléchargements
Publiée
Comment citer
Numéro
Rubrique
Licence
(c) Tous droits réservés Everton Natividade (Autor) 2009
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by/4.0/88x31.png)
Ce travail est disponible sous la licence Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International .
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).