GUILLORY, John. On Close Reading. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2025.

Auteurs

DOI :

https://doi.org/10.35699/2317-2096.2026.61075

Résumé

John Guillory became an influential scholar in the 1990s with Cultural Capital (2023), a book that was crucial in the so-called Canon Wars of the period. Guillory turned to the sociology of literature to argue for the necessity of historicizing the concept of value of literary works, as well as recognizing that the history of literature “cannot be dissociated from the history of the school” (Guillory, 2023, p. 60). Cultural Capital sparked an interest among scholars in the institutionalization of literature and in understanding the role of academic institutions and practices in this.

Téléchargements

Les données relatives au téléchargement ne sont pas encore disponibles.

Biographie de l'auteur

  • William Weber Wanderlinde, Independent researcher | BR

    Holds a Master’s degree in English - Linguistics and Literature, in the field of Literatures in English, and a doctorate in English: Linguistic and Literary Studies, in the field of Literary and Cultural Studies, both from Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina. His doctoral dissertation examines the publishing history of the work of the British poet/artist William Blake through four collected editions. He is currently conducting independent research on editions of British Romantic poets produced during the modernist period. Research interests include British Romanticism, textual criticism, and book history.

Références

GUILLORY, John. Cultural Capital: The Problem of Literary Canon Formation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2023.

GUILLORY, John. On Close Reading. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2025.

GUILLORY, John. Professing Criticism: Essays on the Organization of Literary Study. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2022.

Téléchargements

Publiée

2026-03-23

Comment citer

Wanderlinde, W. W. (2026). GUILLORY, John. On Close Reading. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2025. Aletria: Revista De Estudos De Literatura, 36(1), 201-203. https://doi.org/10.35699/2317-2096.2026.61075