Polyphony and representativeness in The Sound and the Fury
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17851/1982-0739.23.1.85-96Palavras-chave:
polyphonic novel, double-voiced discourse, representativeness, democracyResumo
The aim of this article is to discuss the way in which the form of multiple voices in the novel The Sound and the Fury by William Faulkner relates to the question of democracy, more specifically, to the theme of representativeness. The questions we seek to answer
include: the extent to which the plurality of voices equally valid; the way this polyphony depicts the question of representativeness; and the way in which the novel constructs, through fiction, the social relationships and conflicts of its setting. Our theoretical grounding is based on Mikhail Bakhtin’s concept of the polyphonic novel and the double-voiced discourse. We conclude that Faulkner’s novel shows that, as in real life, there is no representativeness, and thus, no democracy.
Downloads
Referências
BAKHTIN, Mikhail. Problems of Dostoevsky’s Poetics. Trans. Caryl Emerson. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1984.
FAULKNER, William. The Sound and the Fury. London: Vintage Books, 1995.
FLORA, Joseph; MACKETHAN, Lucinda; TAYLOR, Todd. The Companion to Southern Literature: Themes, Genres, Places, People, Movements and Motifs. Louisiana: Baton Rouge, 2003.
HOLT, Thomas; GREEN, Laurie; WILSON, Charles. The New Encyclopedia of Southern Culture: Volume 24: Race. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2013.
MATHIESSEN, Francis. American Renaissance: Art and Expression in the Age of Emerson and Whitman. New York: Oxford University Press, 1941.



