Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Artigos

Vol. 7 No. 1 (2021): Outros mundos: novas subjetividades, novos métodos

The process in the design and teaching of architecture from a decolonial perspective

Submitted
December 24, 2021
Published
2021-12-24

Abstract

This article approaches architecture as an open process, instead of focusing on the representation of the closed product-project, so referenced by universal ideologies. On the other hand, the emergence of architecture is guided by the production of extraordinary spaces and establishes representation as a paradigm, reducing space to two-dimensional images and transforming it into a commodity product. The rapid and indiscriminate consumption of these images facilitates the acceptance of universal ideologies and cultural imposition. In this sense, coloniality is understood as something that crosses and regulates life in several aspects, reaching the subjectivity of individuals and ways of knowing the reality and the world, with the educational system being one of the main means of maintaining this control. The teaching / learning of architecture focused on the representation of the product-project and the
transmission of the architectorum mode is problematized. Thus, the discussion about project teaching is made from a decolonial perspective, investigating how the evaluation process can contribute to pluriversality and to the valorization of the process, to the detriment of the valorization of the product based on the universal model of what is a “good architecture”. Finally, an open design method with interfaces is presented to exemplify the use of representation as a tool for the process, assisting the investigation of own desires and new subjectivities so that we can design other worlds where many worlds are possible.

References

  1. BALTAZAR, A.P. Além da representação: possibilidades das novas mídias na arquitetura. V!RUS, v. 8, 2012.
  2. BALTAZAR, Ana Paula. Não existe arquitetura decolonial porque não existe ensino de arquitetura decolonial porque não existe arquitetura decolonial. Redobra. Laboratório Urbano, UFBA, nº 15, ano 06, 2020, pp. 121–136.
  3. BANHAM, R. A black box: the secret profession of architecture. In: A critic writes: essays by Reyner Banham. Berkeley/Los Angeles/ London: University of California Press, 1999, p.292–299.
  4. BOAL, Augusto. (1991) Teatro do oprimido e outras poéticas políticas. Rio de Janeiro, Brasil. Civilização Brasileira.
  5. BOURDIEU, P. O funcionamento da escola e sua função de conservação social. In: NOGUEIRA, M. A.; CATANI, A. (Orgs.) Escritos de Educação. Petrópolis: Vozes, 1998. p.53-59.
  6. MALARD, M. L. . A avaliação no ensino do projeto de arquitetura e urbanismo: problemas e dificuldades.. In: Cristiane Rose Duarte; Paulo Afonso Rheingantz; Giselle Azevedo; Laís Bronstein. (Org.). O lugar do projeto no ensino e na pesquisa em arquitetura e urbanismo. Rio de Janeiro: Contra Capa, 2007, v. , p. -.
  7. SILVA, Natália Luiza; MENDES, Olenir Maria. Avaliação formativa no ensino superior: avanços e contradições. Avaliação (Campinas), Sorocaba , v. 22, n. 1, p. 271-297, abr. 2017 . Disponível em https://doi.org/10.1590/s1414-40772017000100014.
  8. PALERMO, Zulma. Palermo: a opção decolonial como um lugaroutro de pensamento. (Entrevista). Epistemologias do Sul, v. 3, n. 2, p. 44-56, 2019.
  9. WAISMAN, Marina. Interior da História: Historiografia arquitetônica para uso de Latino-americanos. São Paulo: Perspectiva, 2013

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.