Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Artigos

Vol. 4 No. 5 (2017): Revista Indisciplinar

Financialization: precisions and expansions of fictitious capital and its logic

Submitted
April 24, 2021
Published
2017-12-01 — Updated on 2017-12-01

Abstract

The crisis facing world capitalism, whose origins date back to the subprime market in the United States in the past decade, has contributed to the emergence of several critical studies that address the issue of financialization of contemporary capitalism. This article aims to contribute to the understanding of this phenomenon in the light of the critique of political economy, using as central explanatory category the fictitious capital. This category constitutes a dialectical development of interest bearing capital, and redefines both in time and space the capitalist relations of production. Financialization is understood as a phenomenon whose origin is related to the responses to the structural crisis of the 1970s and that transcends the economic sphere, possessing narratives and ideas that penetrate society as a whole, and seeks connections with their implications for the everyday life of working families, based on examples from the Brazilian scenario. According to the view defended here, therefore, financialization comprises a global phenomenon, in the sense of world-wide and influences the social fabric as a whole. The text is concluded with a brief reflection on the challenges to oppose this phenomenon, both from the point of view of an academic agenda and political practice, which point to systemic ruptures and to the rescue of the
commons.

References

  1. CARCANHOLO, Marcelo Dias. Crise econômica atual e seus impactos para a organização da classe trabalhadora. In: Aurora, UNESP, Marília, v. 4, n. 6, 2010.
  2. HAIVEN, Max. Financial Totalitarianism: The Economic, Political, Social and Cultural Rule of Speculative Capital, 2013. Disponível em: <http://www.truth-out.org/news/item/16911-financial-totalitarianism-theeconomic-political-social-and-cultural-rule-of-speculative-capital>. Acesso em: 07/08/2017.
  3. _______. Cultures of Financialization: Fictitious Capital in Popular Culture and Everyday Life. Palgrave Macmillan, 2014.
  4. LAPAVITSAS, Costas. Financialized capitalism: crisis and financial expropriation.In: Historical Materialism, v. 17, n. 2, p. 114-148, 2009.
  5. LAVINAS, Lena. A financeirização da política social: o caso brasileiro. In: Forthcoming at Politika , Rio de Janeiro, n. 2, p.35-51, 2015.
  6. ________. The Takeover of Social Policy by Financialization: The Brazilian Paradox. Palgrave Macmillan, 2017.
  7. LEBARON, Genevieve. Reconceptualizing debt bondage: Debt as a class-based form of labor discipline, 2014. Disponível em: <http://crs.sagepub.com/content/early/2014/01/30/0896920513512695>. Acesso em: 07/08/2017.
  8. Lins, Vinícius Ferreira. Valorização fictícia e expropriação real: o conceito de financeirização numa ótica marxiana. Dissertação (Mestrado em Economia) – Faculdade de Economia, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Salvador, 2016. Disponível em: <https://ppgeconomia.ufba.br/
  9. valorizacao-ficticia-e-expropriacao-real-o-conceito-de-financeirizacaonuma-otica-marxiana>. Acesso em: 07/08/2017.
  10. MARX, Karl. O capital: crítica da economia política: livro III: o processo global de produção capitalista. São Paulo: Boitempo Editorial, 2017.
  11. PAINCEIRA, J. P.; CARCANHOLO, M. D. Crise alimentar e financeira: a lógica especulativa atual do capital fictício. In: Anais do 6º Colóquio Marx e Engels, CEMARX, Unicamp, Campinas, 2009.
  12. PALLUDETO, Alex Wilhans Antonio; ROSSI, Pedro. O capital fictício: reinterpretação de uma categoria controversa. In: Anais do 43° Encontro Nacional de Economia , 2016.
  13. SANTOS, C. R. S.; SANFELICI, D. Caminhos da produção financeirizada do espaço urbano: a versão brasileira como contraponto a um modelo.In:Cidades, vol. 12, n. 20, p. 4-35, 2015.