Pedagogia universitária
a melhoria das práticas pedagógicas no ensino superior
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35699/2237-5864.2020.15837Palavras-chave:
Educação superior, Ensino e aprendizagem, Abordagens ao estudo, Concepções de aprendizagem, Qualidade do ensinoResumo
Este artigo é um texto de revisão teórica que destaca várias questões pedagógicas relacionadas à qualidade do ensino e da aprendizagem no ensino superior. Os objetivos deste artigo são, por um lado, a análise da relação das concepções de aprendizagem e abordagens ao estudo dos estudantes com os métodos de ensino e, por outro lado, evidenciar atitudes que professores e estudantes podem adotar para desenvolver uma aprendizagem significativa e um ensino com significado. Pretende-se contribuir para uma leitura crítica e construtiva no desenvolvimento de um ensino superior de qualidade. Para tal, enfatizamos a influência da avaliação no processo de ensino-aprendizagem, apresentamos alguns dos determinantes fundamentais para a promoção da qualidade no ensino superior e consideramos a inovação, a tecnologia e a globalização como fatores complementares para a melhoria das práticas educacionais no ensino superior atual.
Referências
BÉDARD, Denis; CLÉMENT, Mieke; TAYLOR, K. Lynn. Validation of a conceptual framework on faculty development: Meaning and scope. In: A. SAROYAN; M. FRENAY (dir.). Building teaching capacities in higher education: A comprehensive international model. Sterling: Stylus Publishing, 2010.
BEDFORD, Teachers Association. Learning styles: A review of the literature. Toowoomba: University of Southern Queensland, 2004.
BIGGS, John B. Student approaches to learning and studying. Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research, 1987.
BOEKAERTS, Monique. Self-regulated learning at the junction of cognition and motivation. European Psychologist, V. 1, p. 100-112, 1996. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040.1.2.100.
BOWDEN, John A. Student learning: Research into practice. Melbourne: Centre for the Study of Higher Education, 1986.
CHAN, Wendy W.; DIMMOCK, Clive. The internationalization of universities: globalist, internationalist and translocalist models. Journal of research in international education, v. 7, n. 2, p. 184-204, 2008.
COOK-SATHER, Alison; BOVILL, Catherine; FELTEN, Peter. Engaging students as partners in learning and teaching: a guide for faculty. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2014.
DUARTE, Antonio M. Auto-regulação e abordagens à aprendizagem. In: SILVA, A. L.; DUARTE, A. M.; SÁ, I.; SIMÃO, A. V. (org.). Aprendizagem auto-regulada pelo estudante: Perspectivas psicológicas e educacionais. Porto: Porto Editora, 2004.
ENTWISTLE, Noel James. Contrasting perspectives on learning. In: MARTON, F.; HOUNSELL, D. J.; ENTWISTLE, N. J. (ed.). The experience of learning. Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press, 1984.
ENTWISTLE, Noel James. Teaching and the quality of learning in higher education. In: ENTWISTLE, N. J. (ed.). Handbook of educational ideas and practices. London: Routledge, 1990.
ENTWISTLE, Noel James. Frameworks for understanding as experienced in essay writing and in preparing for examinations. Educational Psychologist, n. 30, p. 47-54, 1995. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3001_5.
ENTWISTLE, Noel James. Approaches to studying and levels of understanding: The influences of teaching and assessment. In: SMART, J. C. (ed.). Higher education: Handbook of theory and research. New York: Agathon Press, 2000.
ENTWISTLE, Noel James; RAMSDEN, Paul. Understanding student learning. London: Croom Helm, 1983.
ENTWISTLE, Noel James; TAIT, Hilary. Approaches to learning, evaluation of teaching, and preferences for contrasting academic environments. Higher Education, v. 19, p. 169-194, 1990. Disponible en: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED359206.pdf.
FUNG, Dilly. A connected curriculum for higher education. London: UCL press, 2017.
GIBB, Graham. Dimensions of quality. York: Higher Education Academy, 2010.
HUDZIK, John K. Comprehensive internationalization: From Concept to Action. Washington, DC: NAFSA, The Association of International Educators, 2011.
KEMBER, David. Teaching beliefs and their impact on student’s approach to learning. In: DART, B.; BOULTON-LEWIS, G. (ed.). Teaching and learning in higher education. Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research, 1998.
KREBER, Carolin. Different perspectives on internationalization in higher education. New directions for teaching and learning, v. 18, p. 1-14, 2009.
LAND, Ray. Toil and trouble: threshold concepts as a pedagogy of uncertainty’. In: LAND, R.; MEYER, J.H.F.; FLANAGAN, M.T. (ed.). Threshold concepts in practice. Rotterdam: Sense publishers, 2016.
LAURILLARD, Diana. Rethinking university teaching. London: Routledge, 1993.
LUCKETT, Kathy. Curriculum contestation in a post-colonial context: A view from the south. Teaching in higher education, v. 21, n. 4, p. 415-28, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2016.1155547.
MARTON, Ference; DALL’ALBA, Gloria; BEATY, Elizabeth. Conceptions of learning. International Journal of Educational Research, n. 18, p. 227-300, 1993.
MARTON, Ference; HOUNSELL, Dai; ENTWISTLE, Noel James. The experience of learning. Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press, 1984.
MARTON, Ference; SÄLJÖ, Roger. On qualitative differences in learning: Outcome and process. British Journal of Educational Psychology, n. 46, p. 4-11, 1976. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1976.tb02980.x.
MARTON, Ference; SÄLJÖ, Roger. Approaches to learning. In: MARTON, F.; HOUNSELL, D. J.; ENTWISTLE, N. J. (ed.). The experience of learning. 2. ed. Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press, 1997.
MCCUNE, Velda; ENTWISTLE, Noel. The deep approach to learning: Analytic abstraction and idiosyncratic development. In: INNOVATIONS IN HIGHER EDUCATION CONFERENCE, Anais [...] Helsinki: researchgate, 2000. Disponible en: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/251734989_The_deep_approach_to_learning_analytic_abstraction_and_idiosyncratic_development.
NICOL, David; THOMSON, Avril; BRESLIN, Caroline. Rethinking feedback practices in higher education: a peer review perspective’. Assessment and evaluation in higher education, v. 39, n. 1, p. 102-22, 2014. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2013.795518.
NIGHTINGALE, Peggy; O’NEIL, Mike. Achieving quality learning in higher education. London: Kogan Page, 1994.
OECD. Learning our lessons: Review of quality teaching in higher education. OECD Publishing, 2010.
PROSSER, Michael; TRIGWELL, Keith; TAYLOR, Philip. A phenomenographic study of academics’ conceptions of science learning and teaching. Learning & Instruction, v. 4, p. 217-232, 1994. Disponible en: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/0959475294900248.
RAMSDEN, Paul. Learning to teach in higher education. London: Routledge. 1992.
SAMBELL, Kay; MCDOWELL, Liz; MONTGOMERY, Catherine. Assessment for Learning in Higher Education. Abingdon: Routledge, 2012.
SCHMECK, Ronald Ray. Learning styles and strategies. New York: Plenum Press, 1988.
SILVA, Adelina. A auto-regulação na aprendizagem. In: SILVA, A. L.; DUARTE, A. M.; SÁ, I.; SIMÃO, A. V. (org.). Aprendizagem auto-regulada pelo estudante: Perspectivas psicológicas e educacionais. Porto: Porto Editora, 2004.
TIERNEY, William G.; LANFORD, Michael. Conceptualizing innovation in higher education. In: PAULSEN, M. (ed.). Higher education: handbook of theory and research. Springer, 2016.
TRIGWELL, Keith; PROSSER, Michael; WATERHOUSE, Fiona. Relations between teacher’s approaches to teaching and student learning. Higher Education, v. 37, p. 57-70, 1999. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003548313194.
VAN DRIEL, Jan H; VERLOOP, Nico; VAN WERVEN, H. Inge; DEKKERS, Hetty. Teacher’s craft knowledge and curriculum innovation in higher engineering education. Higher Education, v. 34, p. 105-122, 1997. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003063317210.
VASCONCELOS, Rosa Maria; ALMEIDA, Leandro; MONTEIRO, Silvia. Métodos de estudo em alunos do 1º ano da universidade. Psicologia Escolar e Educação, v. 9, n. 2, p. 195-202, 2005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-85572005000200002.
WEINSTEIN, Claire; MEYER, Debra. Learning strategies, teaching and testing. In: HUSEN, T.; POSTLEWAITE, T. N. (ed.). The international encyclopedia of education. 2. ed. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1994.
YEMINI, Miri. Internationalisation discourse hits the tipping point: A new definition is needed. Perspectives: Policy and Practice in Higher Education, v. 19, n. 1, p. 19-22, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13603108.2014.966280.
ZIMMERMAN, Barry J. Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In: BOEKAERTS, M.; PINTRICH, P.; ZEIDNER, M. (ed.). Handbook of self-regulation. New York: Academic Press, 2000. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012109890-2/50031-7.
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Seção
Licença
Autores que publicam nesta revista mantêm os direitos autorais e concedem à revista o direito de primeira publicação, com o trabalho simultaneamente licenciado sob a Licença Creative Commons Attribution que permite o compartilhamento do trabalho com reconhecimento da autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
Autores têm autorização para assumir contratos adicionais separadamente, para distribuição não-exclusiva da versão do trabalho publicada nesta revista (ex.: publicar em repositório institucional ou como capítulo de livro), com reconhecimento de autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
Política de acesso aberto:
A Revista Docência do Ensino Superior é um periódico de Acesso Aberto, o que significa que todo o conteúdo está disponível gratuitamente, sem custo para o usuário ou sua instituição. Os usuários podem ler, baixar, copiar, distribuir, imprimir, pesquisar ou vincular os textos completos dos artigos, ou usá-los para qualquer outra finalidade legal, sem solicitar permissão prévia do editor ou do autor, desde que respeitem a licença de uso do Creative Commons utilizada pelo periódico. Esta definição de acesso aberto está de acordo com a Iniciativa de Acesso Aberto de Budapeste (BOAI).
