Research on teacher training in the national meetings of ANPEd

is there a place for evaluations?

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35699/2237-5864.2019.2550

Keywords:

Teacher training, GT8 from ANPEd, Educational evaluation

Abstract

The present documentary research aimed to identify some evidence of the debate about the educational evaluation in teacher training. For that, we chose the texts from research published in GT8 – Teacher Training in the National Meetings of the National Association of Postgraduate and Research in Education from 2005 to 2015 as the object of our analysis. The research showed that none of the 335 texts presented in the ten editions mapped discussed the educational evaluation in the context of teacher training. This gap raises concerns since it opens space for the culture of professional training courses offered by the education systems that aim, mainly, to provide teachers and school managers with tools for the so-called appropriation of results, once again creating conditions for the evaluation of the system to gain space on classroom assessment.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Helena Rivelli de Oliveira, Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora(UFJF), Juiz de Fora, MG, Brasil.

Doutoranda em Educação pelo Programa de Pós-Graduação em Educação da Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora (UFJF), na linha de pesquisa Linguagens, Culturas e Saberes. Membro do Grupo de Pesquisas em Educação Superior (GRUPES/UFJF).

Diovana Paula de Jesus, Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora(UFJF), Juiz de Fora, MG, Brasil.

Doutoranda em Educação pelo Programa de Pós-Graduação em Educação da Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora, na linha de pesquisa Linguagens, Culturas e Saberes. Membro do Grupo Educação, Cultura e Comunicação (EDUCCO/UFJF) e do Grupo de Pesquisas em Educação Superior (GRUPES/UFJF).

Eliane Medeiros Borges, Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora(UFJF), Juiz de Fora, MG, Brasil.

Doutora em Educação pela Universidade Estadual de Campinas. É professora associada da Faculdade de Educação da Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora. É coordenadora do EDUCCO/UFJF e do GRUPES/UFJF. É coordenadora-geral do Centro de Educação a Distância (CEAD) da UFJF e também Coordenadora do Mestrado Profissional em Gestão e Avaliação da Educação Pública da UFJF.

Downloads

Published

2019-06-18

How to Cite

OLIVEIRA, H. R. de; JESUS, D. P. de; BORGES, E. M. Research on teacher training in the national meetings of ANPEd: is there a place for evaluations?. Revista Docência do Ensino Superior, Belo Horizonte, v. 9, p. 1–15, 2019. DOI: 10.35699/2237-5864.2019.2550. Disponível em: https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/rdes/article/view/2550. Acesso em: 3 jul. 2024.

Issue

Vol. 9 (2019)

Section

Article

License

Copyright (c) 2019 Helena Rivelli de Oliveira, Diovana Paula de Jesus, Eliane Medeiros Borges

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish in this journal retain the copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which allows the sharing of work with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal.

Authors are authorized to take additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (e.g. publish in institutional repository or as a book chapter), with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal.

 

Open access policy:

Revista Docência do Ensino Superior  is an Open Access journal, which means that all content is available free of charge, at no cost to the user or their institution. Users may read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles, or use them for any other legal purpose, without seeking prior permission from the publisher or author, provided they respect the license to use the Creative Commons used by the journal. This definition of open access is in line with the Budapest Open Access Initiative (BOAI).