¿La prueba de práctica oral estructurada es comparable al examen clínico objetivo estructurado en la evaluación de micro habilidades clínicas?

Autores/as

  • Flávia Soares de Matos Universidade José do Rosário Vellano em Belo Horizonte (UNIFENAS/BH), Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5724-8128
  • Antonio Toledo Jr Universidade José do Rosário Vellano em Belo Horizonte (UNIFENAS/BH), Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8912-2589

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35699/2237-5864.2020.19242

Palabras clave:

Educación médica, Evaluación educacional, Competencia clínica

Resumen

La simulación se ha convertido en una importante estrategia de enseñanza en los cursos de salud. El examen clínico objetivo estructurado (OSCE) se considera el estándar de oro en la evaluación de habilidades/competencias en la simulación, pero requiere muchos recursos, lo que dificulta su rendimiento frecuente. El objetivo de este estudio fue comparar el OSCE con la prueba de práctica oral estructurada en la evaluación de micro habilidades clínicas en un escenario simulado. Se realizó un estudio cuasiexperimental con 21 estudiantes de medicina que comparó los dos tipos de pruebas en la evaluación de cinco habilidades obstétricas en un escenario simulado. Los estudiantes fueron divididos en dos grupos. En la primera fase, cada grupo realizó un tipo de prueba. Después de 3 semanas, se invirtieron y volvieron a realizar la prueba. El tipo de prueba (OSCE u la prueba de práctica oral estructurada) no influyó en la evaluación de los estudiantes (p> 0,05), pero las calificaciones fueron más altas en el segundo día (p<0,05), independientemente del tipo de prueba, sugiriendo un efecto de prueba.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Biografía del autor/a

Flávia Soares de Matos, Universidade José do Rosário Vellano em Belo Horizonte (UNIFENAS/BH), Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil.

Médica Pediatra. Mestre em Ensino em Saúde pela Universidade José do Rosário Vellano em Belo Horizonte (UNIFENAS/BH). Professora do Curso de Medicina da UNIFENAS em Belo Horizonte. Coordenadora do Laboratório de Simulação. Professora colaboradora do Mestrado Profissional em Ensino em Saúde – UNIFENAS/BH.

Antonio Toledo Jr, Universidade José do Rosário Vellano em Belo Horizonte (UNIFENAS/BH), Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil.

Médico Infectologista. Mestre em Saúde Pública/Epidemiologia – UFMG (1998). Doutor em Medicina Tropical e Infectologia – UFTM (2008). Professor TI do Curso de Medicina da Universidade José do Rosário Vellano em Belo Horizonte (UNIFENAS/BH). Coordenador do Internato de Clínica Médica e do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ensino em Saúde. Linhas de pesquisa: avaliação discente e de programas e inteligência emocional.

Citas

AL OMARI, Ahmad; SHAWAGFA, Zuhair M. New experience with objective structured clinical examination in Jordan. Rawal Medical Journal, v. 35, n. 1, p. 78-81, jan. 2010.

AL-ELQ, Abdulmohsen H. Medicine and Clinical Skills Laboratories. Journal of Family & Community Medicine, v. 14, n. 2, p. 59-63, maio 2007.

AMIRI, Marzieh; NICKBAKHT, Mansoureh. The Objective Structured Clinical Examination: A study on satisfaction of students, faculty members, and tutors. Life Science Journal, v. 9, n. 4, p. 4909-4911, dez. 2012.

ANASTAKIS, Dimitri J.; COHEN, Robert; REZNICK, Richard K. The Structured Oral Examination as a Method for Assessing Surgical Residents. American Journal of Surgery, New York, v. 162, n. 1, p. 67-70, jul. 1991.

BRAND, Hendrik S.; SCHOONHEIM-KLEIN, Meta. Is the OSCE more stressful? Examination anxiety and its consequences in different assessment methods in dental education. European Journal of Dental Education, Oxford, v. 13, n. 3, p. 147-153, set. 2009. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0579.2008.00554.x.

BUTLER, Andrew C. Repeated Testing Produces Superior Transfer of Learning Relative to Repeated Studying. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, Washington D.C., v. 36, n. 5, p. 1118-1133, set. 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019902.

DAVIS, Margery H. OSCE: The Dundee Experience. Medical Teacher, London, v. 25, n. 3, p. 255-261, maio 2003. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0142159031000100292.

DAVIS, Margery H.; KARUNATHILAKE, Indika. The Place of the Oral Examination in Today's Assessment Systems. Medical Teacher, London, v. 27, n. 4, p. 294-297, jun. 2005. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01421590500126437.

ELDER, Andrew. Clinical Skills Assessment in the Twenty First Century. Medical Clinics of North America, Philadelphia, v. 102, n. 3, p. 545-558, maio 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcna.2017.12.014.

EPSTEIN, Ronald M. Assessment in Medical Education. New England Journal of Medicine, Boston, v. 356, n. 4, p. 387-396, jan. 2007.

GORMLEY, Gerry. Summative OSCEs in Undergraduate Medical Education. Ulster Medical Journal, Belfast, v. 80, n. 3, p. 127-132, set. 2011.

HARDEN, Ronald M. What Is an OSCE?. Medical Teacher, London. v. 10, n. 1, p. 19-22, 1988. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/01421598809019321.

HARDEN, Ronald M. Misconceptions and the OSCE. Medical Teacher, London, v. 37, n. 7, p. 608-610, jul. 2015. DOI: 10.3109/0142159X.2015.1042443.

HARDEN, Ronald M. Revisiting 'Assessment of Clinical Competence Using an Objective Structured Clinical Examination (Osce)'. Medical Education, Oxford, v. 50, n. 4, p. 376-379, abr. 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.12801.

HARDEN, Ronald M.; GLEESON, F. A. Assessment of Clinical Competence Using an Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE). Medical Education, Oxford, v. 13, n. 1, p. 41-54, jan. 1979.

HARDEN, Ronald M et al. Assessment of Clinical Competence Using Objective Structured Examination. British Medical Journal, London, v. 1, n. 5955, p. 447-451, fev. 1975. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1136%2Fbmj.1.5955.447.

HASHIM, Rizwan et al. Structured Viva as an Assessment Tool: Perceptions of Undergraduate Medical Students. Pakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal, v. 65, n. 1, p. 141-144, fev. 2015.

JAYAWICKRAMARAJAH, P. T. Oral Examinations in Medical Education. Medical Education, Oxford, v. 19, n. 4, p. 290-293, jul. 1985. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.1985.tb01323.x.

KHAN, Huma Musarrat; MIRZA, Taaha Muddassir. Perceptions of Oral Structured Examination: A Move from Subjectivity to Objectivity. Pakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal, v. 67, n. 1, p. 41-46, fev. 2017.

KHAN, Kamran Z. et al. The Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE): AMEE Guide No. 81. Part I: An Historical and Theoretical Perspective. Medical Teacher, London, v. 35, n. 9, p. e1437-1446, set. 2013b. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159x.2013.818634.

KHAN, Kamran Z. et al. The Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE): AMEE Guide No. 81. Part II: Organisation & Administration. Medical Teacher, London, v. 35, n. 9, p. e1447-1463, set. 2013a. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159x.2013.818635.

KROMANN, Charles B.; JENSEN, Morten L.; RINGSTED, Charlotte. The Effect of Testing on Skills Learning. Medical Education, Oxford, v. 43, n. 1, p. 21-27, jan. 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2008.03245.x.

LEBLANC, Vicki. R.; BANDIERA, Glen W. The effects of examination stress on the performance of emergency medicine residents. Medical Education, Oxford, v. 41, n. 6, p. 556-564, jun. 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2007.02765.x.

LUNENFELD, Eitan et al. Assessment of Emergency Medicine: A Comparison of an Experimental Objective Structured Clinical Examination with a Practical Examination. Medical Education, Oxford, v. 25, n. 1, p. 38-44, jan. 1991. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.1991.tb00024.x.

MAJUMDER, Md Anwarul A. et al. An evaluative study of objective structured clinical examination (OSCE): students and examiners perspectives. Advances in Medical Education and Practice, Auckland, v. 10, p. 387-397, jun. 2019. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.2147%2FAMEP.S197275.

MATHEWS, Lulu; MENON, Janaki; MANI, N. S. Micro-OSCE for assessment of undergraduates. Indian Pediatrics, v. 41, p. 159-163, mar. 2004.

MEMON, Muhammed Ashraf; JOUGHIN, Gordon Rowland; MEMON, Breda. Oral Assessment and Postgraduate Medical Examinations: Establishing Conditions for Validity, Reliability and Fairness. Advances in Health Sciences Education: Theory and Practice, Boston, v. 15, n. 2, p. 277-289, maio 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-008-9111-9.

MILLER, George E. The Assessment of Clinical Skills/Competence/Performance. Academic Medicine, Philadelphia, v. 65, n. 9 Supl., p. S63-67, set. 1990. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-199009000-00045.

MONDAL, Rakesh et al. Comparative analysis between Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) and Conventional Examination (CE) as a formative evaluation tool in Pediatrics in semester examination for final MBBS students. Kathmandu University Medical Journal, Kathmandu, v. 37, n. 1, p. 62-65, jan./mar. 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3126/kumj.v10i1.6917.

PASTURA, Patrícia Souza Valle Cardoso; SANTORO-LOPES, Guilherme. O Aprendizado Melhorado Por Provas. Revista Brasileira de Educação Médica, Rio de Janeiro, v. 37, n. 3, p. 429-433, set. 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-55022013000300015.

PIERRE, Russell et al. Student evaluation of an OSCE in paediatrics at the University of the West Indies, Jamaica. BMC Medical Education, London, v. 4, p. 22, 2004. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186%2F1472-6920-4-22.

RAZAVI, Seyyed M. et al. Station-Based Deconstructed Training Model for Teaching Procedural Skills to Medical Students: A Quasi-Experimental Study. Advances in Medical Education and Practice, Auckland, v. 1, p. 17-23, set. 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/amep.s13750.

ROEDIGER, Henry L.; KARPICKE, Jeffrey D. Test-Enhanced Learning: Taking Memory Tests Improves Long-Term Retention. Psychological Science, New York, v. 17, n. 3, p. 249-255, mar. 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01693.x.

SMEE, Sydney. Skill Based Assessment. British Medical Journal, London, v. 326, n. 7391, p. 703-706, mar. 2003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.326.7391.703.

THIESSEN, Nils; FISCHER, Martin; HUVENDIEK, Soren. Assessment methods in medical specialist assessments in the DACH region – overview, critical examination and recommendations for further development. GMS Journal for Medical Education, Erlangen, v. 36, n. 6, p. 1-23, 2019. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3205%2Fzma001286.

TIJANI, Kehinde H. et al. A comparison of The Objective Structured Clinical Examination and the Traditional Oral Clinical Examination in a Nigerian University. Journal of the West African College of Surgeons, Lagos, v. 7, n. 3, p. 59-72, jul./set. 2017.

TRONCON, Luiz Ernesto. Clinical skills assessment: limitations to the introduction of an "OSCE" (Objective Structured Clinical Examination) in a traditional Brazilian medical school. São Paulo Medical Journal, São Paulo, v. 122, n. 1, p. 12‐17, 2004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-31802004000100004.

VAN DER VLEUTEN, Cees P. et al. The Assessment of Professional Competence: Building Blocks for Theory Development. Best Practice & Research: Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Amsterdam, v. 24, n. 6, p. 703-719, dez. 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2010.04.001.

WASS, Val et al. Assessment of Clinical Competence. Lancet, London, v. 357, n. 9260, p. 945-949, mar. 2001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(00)04221-5.

WASS, Val et al. Achieving Acceptable Reliability in Oral Examinations: An Analysis of the Royal College of General Practitioners Membership Examination's Oral Component. Medical Education, Oxford, v. 37, n. 2, p. 126-131, fev. 2003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2923.2003.01417.x.

YOUNG, Ian et al. The benefits of a peer-assisted mock OSCE. The Clinical Teacher, Oxford, v. 11, n. 3, p. 214-218, jun. 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/tct.12112.

Descargas

Publicado

2020-09-15

Cómo citar

MATOS, F. S. de; TOLEDO JR, A. ¿La prueba de práctica oral estructurada es comparable al examen clínico objetivo estructurado en la evaluación de micro habilidades clínicas?. Revista Docência do Ensino Superior, Belo Horizonte, v. 10, p. 1–21, 2020. DOI: 10.35699/2237-5864.2020.19242. Disponível em: https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/rdes/article/view/19242. Acesso em: 26 jul. 2024.

Número

Vol. 10 (2020)

Sección

Artículos

Licencia

Los autores que publican en esta revista conservan los derechos de autor y otorgan a la revista el derecho de primera publicación, siendo la obra licenciada simultáneamente bajo la Creative Commons Attribution License, que permite compartir la obra con reconocimiento de autoría y publicación inicial en esta revista.

Los autores están autorizados a asumir contratos adicionales por separado, para la distribución no exclusiva de la versión del trabajo publicado en esta revista (por ejemplo, publicación en un repositorio institucional o como capítulo de libro), con reconocimiento de autoría y publicación inicial en esta revista.

 

Política de acceso abierto:

La Revista Docência do Ensino Superior es una revista de Acceso Abierto, lo que significa que todo el contenido está disponible de forma gratuita, sin costo para el usuario o su institución. Los usuarios pueden leer, descargar, copiar, distribuir, imprimir, buscar o vincular a los textos completos de los artículos, o utilizarlos para cualquier otro propósito legal, sin necesidad de obtener el permiso previo del editor o autor, siempre que respeten la licencia de uso. los Creative Commons utilizados por la revista. Esta definición de acceso abierto está en línea con la Iniciativa de Acceso Abierto de Budapest (BOAI).