Versión brasileña del toronto pain management inventory - acute coronary syndrome

Autores/as

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5935/1415-2762.20200057

Palabras clave:

Conocimiento, Dolor en el Pecho, Enfermería, Estudio de Validación, Síndrome Coronario Agudo

Resumen

Objetivo: realizar la adaptación transcultural del instrumento Toronto Pain Management Inventory - Acute Coronary Syndrome al idioma portugués de Brasil y analizar la evidencia de la validez aparente del instrumento adaptado. Métodos: para la adaptación transcultural se siguieron los procedimientos propuestos por la Guideline for Establishing Cultural Equivalency of Instruments (RDC/TMD) Consortium Network (fase 1). Para verificar el acuerdo entre los jueces en el análisis de equivalencias se utilizó el índice de validez de contenido (IVC). La validez aparente se realizó con los enfermeros durante la prueba previa y consistió en evaluar la facilidad de comprensión para responder a los ítems. Resultados: el instrumento adaptado logró equivalencia lingüística. Las equivalencias semánticas, idiomáticas, experimentales y conceptuales tuvieron un IVC promedio de 98.5 (IC 95% 97.1-100.0), 97.8 (IC 95% 96.0-99.5), 94.1 (IC 95 % 91.6-96.6) y 99.6 (IC 95% 98.9- 100.0). En la prueba previa, el 92.5% de los enfermeros consideraba que el instrumento era fácil de entender y el 85% no encontró dificultades. Conclusión: el instrumento adaptado es culturalmente equivalente al instrumento original y reúne evidencia de validez aparente. Las propiedades psicométricas del instrumento aún no se han investigado.

Descargas

Los datos de descarga aún no están disponibles.

Referencias

1. Ministério da Saúde (BR). Sistema de Informações Hospitalares do SUS (SIH/SUS). 2002[citado em 2020 fev. 3]. Disponível em: http://tabnet.datasus.gov.br/cgi/tabcgi.exe?sih/cnv/nrbr.def

2. Makki N, Brennan TM, Girotra S. Acute coronary syndrome. J Intensive Care Med. 2015[citado em 2019 out. 10];30(4):186-200.Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1177/0885066613503294

3. Chang AM, Fischman DL, Hollander JE. Evaluation of chest pain and acute coronary syndromes. Cardiol Clin. 2018[citado em 2019 out. 10];36(1):1-12. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccl.2017.08.001

4. Aroesty JM, Kannam JP. Patient education: chest pain (Beyond the Basics). Up to Date. 2018[citado em 2019 out. 10]. Disponível em: https://www.uptodate.com/contents/chest-pain-beyond-the-basics

5. Piegas LS, Timerman A, Feitosa GS, Nicolau JC, Mattos LA, Andrade MD, et al. V Guideline of the Brazilian Society of Cardiology on acute myocardial infarction treatment with ST Segment Elevation. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2015[citado em 2019 out. 10];105(2):1-121. Disponível em: http://www.scielo.br/pdf/abc/v105n2s1/0066-782X-abc-105-02-s1-0001.pdf

6. Brant JM, Mohr C, Coombs NC, Finn S, Wilmarth E. Nurses’ knowledge and attitudes about pain: personal and professional characteristics and patient reported pain satisfaction. Pain Manag Nurs. 2017[citado em 2019 out. 10];18(4):214-23.Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmn.2017.04.003

7. Alzghoul B, Abdullah NA. Pain Management practices by nurses: an application of the Knowledge, Attitude and Practices (KAP) model. Glob J Health Sci. 2015[citado em 2019 out. 10];8(6):154-60. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.5539/gjhs.v8n6p154

8. Gretarsdottir E, Zoega S, Tomasson G, Sveindottir H, Gunnarsdottir S. Determinants of knowledge and attitudes regarding pain among nurses in a university hospital: a cross-sectionalstudy. Pain Manag Nurs. 2017[citado em 2019 out. 10];18(3):144-52. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2007.02183.x

9. Watt-Watson J, Stevens B, Garfinkel P, Streiner D, Gallop R. Relationshipbetween nurses’ pain knowledge and pain management outcomes for their postoperative cardiac patients patients. J Adv Nurs. 2001[citado em 2019 out. 10];36(4):535-45. Disponível em: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2001.02006.x

10. O’Keefe-McCarthy S, McGillion M, Nelson S, Clarke S, McFetridge-Durdle J, Watt-Watson J. Content validity of the Toronto pain management inventory acute coronary syndrome version. Can J Cardiovasc Nurse. 2014[citado em 2019 out. 10];24(2):11-8. Disponível em: https://www.onlinecjc.ca/article/S0828-282X(12)01182-8/pdf

11. Orbach R, Bjomer J, Jazewski M, John MT, Lobbezoo F. Guidelines for establishing cultural equivalency of instruments. 2013[citado em 2019 out. 10]. Disponível em: https://ubwp.buffalo.edu/rdc-tmdinternational/wpcontent/uploads/sites/58/2017/01/Guidelines-for-Translation-and-Cultural-Equivalency-of-Instruments-2013_05_118608.pdf

12. Dias JS, Rocha LP, Carvalho DP, Tomaschewski-Barlem JG, Barlem ELD, Dalmolin GL. Construction and validation of a tool to assess nursing interpersonal relations. Rev Bras Enferm. 2019[citado em 2020 maio 2];72(2):408-13. Disponível em: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-71672019000200408&lng=em

13. Silveira MB, Saldanha RP, Leite JCC, Silva TOF, Silva T, Filippin LI. Construction and validation of content of one instrument to assess falls in the elderly. Einstein (São Paulo). 2018[citado em 2020 maio 2];16(2):eAO4154. Disponível em: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1679-45082018000200207&lng=en

14. Altman DG. Practical statistics for medical research. London: CRC Texts; 1990.

15. Santos SM, Araújo TL, Cavalcante TF, Galindo Neto NM. Acutepain in myocardial infarction: analysis of concept. Rev Gaúcha Enferm. 2015[citado em 2019 out. 109];36(3):102-8. Disponível em: https://www.scielo.br/pdf/rgenf/v36n3/pt_1983-1447-rgenf-36-03-00102.pdf

16. Oliveira Jr MT, Canesin MF, Marcolino MS, Ribeiro AL, Carvalho AC, Reddy S, et al. Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia. Telemedicine guideline in Patient Care with Acute Coronary Syndrome and Other heart Diseases. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2015[citado em 2019 out. 10];104(5 supl.1):1-26.Disponível em: http://publicacoes.cardiol.br/portal/abc/portugues/aop/2019/aop-diretriztelemedicina-portugues.pdf

17. El-Rahman MA, Kaladeh MTA, Muhbes FJ. Knowledgeandattitudetowardspain management: a comparison between oncology and non-oncology nurses in Jordan. Int J Nurs Stud. 2013[citado em 2019 out. 10];2(2):95-100. Disponível em: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/274469179_Knowledge_and_attitude_towards_pain_management_A_comparison_between_oncology_and_non-oncology_nurses_in_Jordan

18. Weeler E, Hardi T, Klemum P, Akanji I, Schonewolf E, Scott J, et al. Level of pain and waiting time in the emergency department. Pain Manag Nurs. 2010[citado em 2019 out. 10];11(2):108-14. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmn.2009.06.005

19. Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000[citado em 2020 maio 2];25(24):3186-91. Disponível em: https://journals.lww.com/spinejournal/Fulltext/2000/12150/Guidelines_for_the_Process_of_Cross_Cultural.14.aspx

20. Quatrini HCCPG, Pena SB, Lopes JL, Lopes CT, Barros ALBL. Experts for validation studies in nursing: new proposal and selection criteria. Int J Nurs Knowl. 2016[citado em 2020 maio 2];27(3):130-5. Disponível em: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/2047-3095.12089

21. Powell C. The Delphi technique: mythsand realities. J Adv Nurs. 2003 [citado em 2020 maio 2];41(4):376-82. Disponível em: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02537.x

22. Humphrey-Murto S, Varpio L, Wood TJ, Gonsalves C, Ufholz LA, Mascioli K, et al. The use of the Delphi and other consensus group methods in medical education research: a review. Acad Med. 2017[citado em 2020 maio 2];92(10):1491-8. Disponível em: https://journals.lww.com/academicmedicine/Fulltext/2017/10000/The_Use_of_the_Delphi_and_Other_Consensus_Group.38.aspx

23. Connell J, Carlton J, Grundy A, Taylor Buck E, Keetharuth AD, Ricketts T, et al. The importance of content and face validity in instrument development: lessons learnt from service users when developing the Recovering Quality of Life measure (ReQoL). Qual Life Res. 2018[citado em 2020 maio 2];27(7):1893-902. Disponível em: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5997715/pdf/11136_2018_Article_1847.pdf

24. Pretorius A, Searle J, Marsball B. Barriers and enablers to emergency department nurses’ management of patient’spain. Pain Manag Nurs. 2015[citado em 2019 out. 10];16(3):372-9. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmn.2014.08.015

25. O’Keefe-Mc Carthy S, Mc Guillion M, Clarke SP, Mc Fetridge-Durdle J. Pain and anxiety in rural acute coronary syndrome patient sawaiting diagnostic cardiac catheterization. J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2015[citado em 2019 out. 10];30(6):546-57. Disponível em: https://journals.lww.com/jcnjournal/Abstract/2015/11000/Pain_and_Anxiety_in_Rural_Acute_Coronary_Syndrome.13.aspx

Descargas

Publicado

2020-05-13

Número

Vol. 24 (2020)

Sección

Investigación

Licencia

Derechos de autor 2020 Reme: Revista Mineira de Enfermagem

Creative Commons License

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.

Cómo citar

1.
Versión brasileña del toronto pain management inventory - acute coronary syndrome. REME Rev Min Enferm. [Internet]. 2020 May 13 [cited 2026 Apr. 15];24. Available from: https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/reme/article/view/49944

Artículos más leídos del mismo autor/a