Construction and evidence of validity of the knowledge assessment instrument on Quaternary Prevention
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35699/2316-9389.2022.41233Keywords:
Enfermedad Iatrogénica, Prevención Cuaternaria, Promoción de la SaludAbstract
Objective: to develop and estimate the evidence of validity of an instrument to assess the perception of medical students about Quaternary Prevention. Method: this is a methodological study carried out in three steps: 1) construction of the instrument to assess knowledge about Quaternary Prevention based on theoretical references; 2) content-based evidence of validity, performed by 13 judges; 3) internal structure-based evidence of validity, performed by 180 medical students. Factor analyzes were performed to verify the hierarchical structure of the model based on the two dimensions initially constructed: Knowledge Domain and Practical Domain. Results: The total scale content validity evidence coefficient (CVCt) was 0.98, demonstrating a high inter-rater agreement with the underlying theoretical conceptualization. As for instrument precision, all items had Cronbach's Alpha values above 0.7, indicating good precision. Good precision indicators were found for the scale with two factors (Knowledge Domain and Practical Domain) ƛ2= 109,746, gl= 103; p<0.001; ƛ2/gl=0.30; CFI=0.98 and RMSEA 0.019. Conclusion: the IP4-15 instrument presented adequate evidence of content validity, internal structure, precision, and properties of the items to assess the knowledge and practice of Quaternary Prevention of medical students. Future studies will be needed to investigate the applicability of IP4-15 to other populations.
Downloads
References
Jamoulle M, Roland M. Quaternary Prevention. WICC Annual Workshop: Hongkong, Wonca Congress Proceedings; 1995.
Martins C, Godycki-Cwrko M, Heleno B, Brodersen J. Quaternary prevention: reviewing the concept. Eur J Gen Pract [Internet]. 2018[citado em 2022 fev. 21];24(1):106-11. Disponível em: 10.1080/13814788.2017.1422177
Pizzanelli M, Almenas M, Quirós R, Pineda C, Cordero E, Taureaux N, et al. Prevención Cuaternaria: ética médica, evaluación y eficiencia en los sistemas de salud. Rev Bras Med Fam Comum [Internet]. 2016[citado em 2021 jun. 18];11:75-85. Disponível em: http://dx.doi.org//10.5712/rbmfc11(0)1388
Varela J. Overdiagnosis: realities and perspectives. Med Clin (Barc) [Internet]. 2017[citado em 2021 dez. 12];148(3):118-20. Disponível em doi: 10.1016/j.medcli.2016.10.011
Verkerk EW, Tanke MAC, Kool RB, van Dulmen SA, Westert GP. Limit, lean or listen? A typology of low-value care that gives direction in de-implementation. Int J Qual Health Care [Internet]. 2018[citado em 2020 dez. 11];30(9):736-9. Disponível em: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzy100
Shrank WH, Rogstad TL, Parekh N. Waste in the US Health Care System: estimated costs and potential for savings. JAMA [Internet]. 2019[citado em 2020 nov. 29]. Disponível em: http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.2019.13978
Word Health Organization. Relatório Mundial da Saúde: financiamento dos sistemas de saúde - o caminho para a cobertura universal. Genova: WHO; 2010[citado em 2020 dez. 20]. Disponível em: https://www.who.int/whr/2010/whr10_pt.pdf
Norman AH, Tesser CD. Prevenção quaternária na atenção primária à saúde: uma necessidade do Sistema Único de Saúde. Cad Saúde Pública [Internet]. 2009[citado em 2022 fev. 13];25(9):2012-20. Disponível em: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0102-311X2009000900015
Ministério da Educação (BR). Diretrizes Curriculares Nacionais do Curso de Graduação em Medicina. Brasília: MS; 2014[citado em 2020 dez. 08]. Disponível em: http://portal.mec.gov.br/index.php?option=com_docman&view=download&alias=15514-pces116-14&category_slug=abril-2014-pdf&Itemid=30192
Hernandez-Nieto R. Contributions to Statistical Analysis. Venezuela: Booksurge Publishing; 2002.
Timmerman ME, Lorenzo-Seva U. Dimensionality assessment of ordered polytomous items with parallel analysis. Psychol Methods [Internet]. 2011[citado em 2020 dez. 10];16(2):209-20. Disponível em: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0023353
Hu LT, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Modeling [Internet]. 1999[citado em 2021 dez. 26];6(1):1-55. Disponível em: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
Kline RB. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. New York: The Guilford Press; 2012.
Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE, Tatham RL. Análise Multivariada dos Dados. Porto Alegre: Bookman; 2009.
Pasquali L. Instrumentação Psicológica: Fundamentos e Prática. Porto Alegre: Artmed; 2010.
Conselho Federal de Psicologia. Resolução No 9, de 25 de Abril de 2018; 2018[citado em 2021 jan. 10]. Disponível em: http://www.crp11.org.br/upload/Resolu%C3%A7%C3%A3o-CFP-n%C2%BA-09-2018-com-anexo.pdf
Lorenzo-Seva U, Ferrando PJ. A Comprehensive Program for Fitting Exploratory and Semiconfirmatory Factor Analysis and IRT Models. Appl Psychol Meas [Internet]. 2013[citado em 2021 jan. 08];37(6):497-8. Disponível em: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146621613487794
Bond TG, Fox CM. Applying the Rasch Model: Fundamental Measurement in the Human Sciences. 3ª ed. Mahwah New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2015.
Linacre JM. A User’s Guide to Winsteps Ministep: Rasch-Model Computer Programs; 2015.
Coluci MZO, Alexandre NMC, Milani D. Construção de instrumentos de medida na área da saúde. Ciênc Saúde Colet [Internet]. 2015[citado em 2020 dez. 11];20(3):925-36. Disponível em: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232015203.04332013
Fayers PM, Machin D. Quality of Life: the assessment, analysis, and interpretation. The Assessment, Analysis, and Interpretation of Patient-Reported Outcomes. Chichester, England: Wiley-Blackwell; 2007.
Pinto Hespanhol A, Couto L, Martins C. A medicina preventiva. Rev Port Med Geral Fam [Internet]. 2008[citado em 2020 dez. 14];24(1):49-64. Disponível em: https://www.rpmgf.pt/ojs/index.php/rpmgf/article/view/10462
American Educational Research Association. Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing; 2014. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association; c2022.
Edelen MO, Reeve BB. Applying item response theory (IRT) modeling to questionnaire development, evaluation, and refinement. Qual Life Res [Internet]. 2007[citado em 2022 jan. 12];16(Suppl. 1):5–18. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-007-9198-0
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 REME-Revista Mineira de Enfermagem

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


































