Vol. 6 No. 2 (2025): Political animals: animality, community, and the future body politic (continuous publication)
Special Dossier

The animal body as a frontier: politics, affect, and performativity in the human-animal relationship

Alejandra Vallejos Carrasco
University of Chile
Bio
Andrés Gómez Seguel
University of Chile
Bio

Published 2026-01-12

Keywords

  • Multispecies politics,
  • performativity,
  • animal otherness

How to Cite

VALLEJOS CARRASCO, Alejandra; GÓMEZ SEGUEL, Andrés. The animal body as a frontier: politics, affect, and performativity in the human-animal relationship. (Des)troços: revista de pensamento radical, Belo Horizonte, v. 6, n. 2, p. e60729, 2026. DOI: 10.53981/destrocos.v6i2.60729. Disponível em: https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/revistadestrocos/article/view/60729. Acesso em: 16 jan. 2026.

Abstract

This essay offers a critical reflection on the role of nonhuman animals in contemporary politics, focusing on the tension between their increasing visibility as sentient beings and the persistent normative frameworks that reduce them to objects for human use. Drawing on philosophical and activist perspectives, the text analyzes performance as a tool of pro-animal protest, questioning its scope and limitations when it frames animals within human-centered notions of empathy, care, or victimhood. The essay explores performativity as a lens to challenge the bodily recognition regimes that define the human and the animal, proposing a multispecies politics that embraces the irreducible otherness of animals. It thus advocates for an ethics of encounter that does not seek to translate or domesticate the other but instead sustains the transformative power of difference.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. BRAIDOTTI, Rosi. Lo posthumano. Barcelona: Gedisa, 2015.
  2. BUTLER, Judith. Cuerpos que importan: Sobre los límites materiales y discursivos del “sexo”. Trad. A. Bixio. Buenos Aires: Paidós, 2002.
  3. CHEN, Mel Y. Animacies: Biopolítica, importancia racial y afecto queer. Durham: Duke University Press, 2012.
  4. CUETO RÚA, Santiago et al. Reseñas. Anuario de la Escuela de Historia, [S. l.], n. 30, pp. 217–242, 2018.
  5. DERRIDA, Jaques. El animal que luego estoy si(gui)endo. Trad. C. de Peretti & C. Rodríguez Marciel. Madrid: Editorial Trota, 2008.
  6. DESPRET, Vinciane. ¿Qué dirían los animales... si les hiciéramos las preguntas correctas? Santiago: Cactus, 2018.
  7. GONZÁLEZ, Anahí Gabriela. Devenir animal, devenir crip: una política situada de los cuerpos que tiemblan. Revista Latinoamericana de Estudios Críticos Animales, [S. l.], v. 12, n. 1, pp. 37-119, 2025.
  8. HARAWAY, Donna. Cuando las especies se encuentran. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2008.
  9. HARAWAY, Donna. Manifiesto de las especies de compañía: Perros, gentes y otredad significativa. Trad. Isabel Mellén. Buenos Aires: Bocavulvaria Ediciones, 2017.
  10. MARTÍNEZ OSSA, Manuel. Una aproximación crítica al problema del estatus jurídico de “cosas” de los animales no humanos. Revista Chilena de Derecho Animal, v. 5, pp.7-20, 2024.
  11. NEIRA MUÑOZ, Ángela. El cuerpo en la performance social. Escáner Cultural. Revista virtual de arte contemporáneo y nuevas tendencias, Año 8, n. 90, dec. 2006.
  12. VIVEIROS DE CASTRO, Eduardo. Perspectivismo y multinaturalismo en la América indígena. Trad. Rosa Álvarez y Roger Sansi. In: VIVEIROS DE CASTRO, Eduardo. A inconstância da alma selvagem. São Paulo: Cosac & Naify, 2002. pp. 345–400.