The top 100 most-cited clinical trials and systematic reviews related to children and adolescents’ oral health
A bibliometric analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35699/2178-1990.2023.48679Keywords:
Bibliometrics, Clinical Trial, Pediatric Dentistry, Systematic ReviewAbstract
Aim: To identify and analyze the 100 most-cited clinical trials (CTs) and systematic reviews (SRs) related to children and adolescents’ oral health.
Methods: A search was conducted in the Web of Science Core Collection (WoS-CC), using a specific search strategy. Papers were ranked in descending order, considering number of citations. Only CTs and SRs were considered. Two reviewers selected the papers and collected the bibliometric data: year of publication; number and density of citations; study designs; journals; authors; countries and institutions; topics of study; and keywords. Poisson regression was performed to verify associations between the number of citations and bibliometric parameters.
Results: The 100 most-cited papers were published between 1982 and 2018 and received a total of 8,702 citations in the WoS-CC (ranging from 52 to 177). Fifty-three papers were CTs and 47 SRs. The American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics published the most papers (n=20). Twetman S contributed the highest number of papers (n=7). The United States of America was the most prolific country (n = 17), followed by the Netherlands (n=11). The University of Nijmegen (Netherlands) presented 8 papers among the most-cited. The main topic of interest was Cariology (n = 40). “Dental Caries” was the most frequent keyword (n = 20). The citations’ number from WoS-CC decreased by 1.3% each year (RP: 0.987, 95%CI: 0.975–1.000, p = 0.048).
Conclusion: This bibliometric study allowed an analysis of the most-cited CTs and SRs related to children and adolescents’ oral health, highlighting the most prolific authors, institutions and countries based on the number of citations.
Downloads
References
Chiappelli F. Evidence-Based Dentistry: Two decades and beyond. J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2019;19:7-16.
Sellars S. How evidence-based is dentistry anyway? From evidence-based dentistry to evidence-based practice. Br Dent J. 2020;229:12-14.
Kupietzky A, Fuks A. The keeper of the meaning and the Era of Evidence Based Dentistry. Pediatr Dent. 2018;40:250-252.
Jayaratne YS, Zwahlen RA. The evolution of dental journals from 2003 to 2012: a bibliometric analysis. PloS 2015;10:e0119503.
Hirsch JE. An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102:16569-16572.
Roldan-Valadez E, Salazar-Ruiz SY, Ibarra-Contreras R, Rios C. Current concepts on bibliometrics: a brief review about impact factor, Eigenfactor score, CiteScore, SCImago Journal Rank, Source-Normalised Impact per Paper, H-index, and alternative metrics. Ir J Med Sci. 2019;188:939-951.
Perazzo MF, Otoni ALC, Costa MS, Granville-Granville AF, Paiva SM, Martins-Júnior PA. The top 100 most-cited papers in Paediatric Dentistry journals: A bibliometric analysis. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2019;29:692-711.
Vitali FC, Pires KM, Cardoso IV, et al. Endodontic therapy in primary teeth: a bibliometric analysis of the 100 most-cited papers. Braz Oral Res. 2022;36:e049.
Gogos C, Kodonas K, Fardi A, Economides N. Top 100 cited systematic reviews and meta-analyses in dentistry. Acta odontol Scand. 2020;78:87-97.
Fardi A, Kodonas K, Gogos C, Economides N. Top-cited articles in endodontic journals. J Endod. 2011;37:1183-1190.
Ohta L, O'Brien B, Knight H, Patel J, Anthonappa RP. Publication trends in Pediatric Dentistry Journal: A 20-year bibliometric analysis (1999-2018). Pediatr Dent. 2020;42:354-358.
Dos Santos APP, Raggio DP, Nadanovsky P. Reference is not evidence. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2020;30:661-663.
Chu CH, Lo EC, Lin HC. Effectiveness of silver diamine fluoride and sodium fluoride varnish in arresting dentin caries in Chinese pre-school children. J Dent Res. 2002;81:767-770.
Soncini JA, Maserejian NN, Trachtenberg F, Tavares M, Hayes C. The longevity of amalgam versus compomer/composite restorations in posterior primary and permanent teeth: findings from the New England Children's Amalgam Trial. J Am Dent Assoc. 2007;138:763-772.
Twetman S, Axelsson S, Dahlgren H, et al. Caries-preventive effect of fluoride toothpaste: a systematic review. Acta Odontol Scand. 2003;61:347-355.
Schwendicke F, Elhennawy K, Reda S, Bekes K, Manton DJ, Krois J. Global burden of molar incisor hypomineralization. J Dent. 2018;68:10-18.
Lang NP, Hotz P, Graf H, et al. Effects of supervised chlorhexidine mouthrinses in children. A longitudinal clinical trial. J Period Res. 982;17:101-111.
Andersen J, Belmont J, Cho CT. Journal impact factor in the era of expanding literature. J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2006;39:436-443.
Feijoo JF, Limeres J, Fernández-Varela M, Ramos I, Diz P. The 100 most cited articles in dentistry. Clin Oral Investig. 2014;18:699-706.
da Costa Rosa T, Pintor AVB, Magno MB, Marañón-Vásquez GA, Maia LC, Neves AA. Worldwide trends on molar incisor and deciduous molar hypomineralisation research: a bibliometric analysis over a 19-year period. Eur Arch Paediat Dent. 2022;23:133-146.
Jiang CM, Lee GHM, Lo ECM, Chu CH, Wong MCM. Randomized controlled trials in dental journals on children and adolescents: a bibliometric analysis. J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2021;21:101621.
Hopper L, Morris L, Tickle M. How primary care dentists perceive and are influenced by research. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2011;39:97-104.
Kassebaum NJ, Bernabé E, Dahiya M, Bhandari B, Murray CJ, Marcenes W. Global burden of untreated caries: a systematic review and metaregression. J Dent Res. 2015;94:650-658.
Shadgan B, Roig M, Hajghanbari B, Reid WD. Top-cited articles in rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010;91:806-815.
Ahmad P, Dummer PMH, Chaudhry A, Rashid U, Saif S, Asif JA. A bibliometric study of the top 100 most-cited randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in endodontic journals. Int Endod J. 2019;52:1297-1316.
Bakkalbasi N, Bauer K, Glover J, Wang L. Three options for citation tracking: Google Scholar, Scopus and Web of Science. Biomed Digit Libr. 2006;3:7.
Kulkarni AV, Aziz B, Shams I, Busse JW. Comparisons of citations in Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar for articles published in general medical journals. Jama. 2009;302:1092-1096.
Livas C, Delli K. Journal Self-Citation Rates and Impact Factors in Dentistry, Oral Surgery, and Medicine: A 3-year Bibliometric Analysis. J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2018;18:269-274.
