Human identification through bite marks in foods using reverse engineering and rapid prototyping

a simulated case

Authors

  • Michelle Michel Nascimento Escola Bahiana de Medicina e Saúde Pública
  • Viviane Almeida Sarmento Universidade Estadual de Feira de Santana
  • Valter Estevão Beal SENAI CIMATEC
  • Luis Carlos Cavalcante Galvão Universidade Estadual de Feira de Santana
  • Jeidson Antônio Morais Marques Universidade Estadual de Feira de Santana

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7308/aodontol/2012.48.3.03

Keywords:

Bite force, Forensic dentistry

Abstract

Aim: The present study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of using reverse engineering and rapid prototyping to aid in the identification of individuals through bite marks on foods (chocolate and cake).

Materials and Methods: The sample consisted of eight volunteers. By means of a drawing, three volunteers were selected to be the suspects. Subsequent drawings were made for the bite to be carried out on the respective food. After having defined the sample, the suspect models and the bitten food were scanned using the software Measuring System ATOS I- Industrial 3D Digitizer v6.1. Viewer-8 and TRITOP of GOM Inspect v1.2.1 (Germany).The file generated images which were compared using a three-dimensional analysis. From the virtual model of bitten food, these data were sent to a printer for rapid prototyping where the prototype of chewed food was then formulated. After, the food prototype was directly compared to the suspect’s plaster mold. Through reverse engineering and rapid prototyping, it was possible to accurately identify the author of the bite in the chocolate food. However, food as a slice of cake presented difficulties in correctly identifying the suspect.

Results: The results showed that the texture of food (cake), as well as its fragility and consistency, can influence the taking of 3D images and the consequent construction of the prototype.

Conclusion: Further studies on other types of food need to be carried out to verify the applicability of rapid prototyping due to its great confrontation power, and mainly its capacity to transform perishable evidence into manipulable and perennial evidence.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Marques JAM, Galvão LCC, Silva M. Marcas de mordidas. Feira de Santana: Universidade Estadual Feira de Santana; 2007.

McKenna CJ, Haron MI, Brown KA, Jones AJ. Bitemarks in chocolate: a case report. J Forensic Odontostomatol. 2000; 18:10-4.

Bowers CM. Problem-based analysis of bitemark misidentifications: the role of DNA. J Forensic Int. 2006; 159: S104-9.

Caldas JCFG, Pachini RC, Belmonte LN, Spadácio C, Daruge E. Elucidação de um crime através da marca de mordida: relato de um caso. [internet]. [acesso em 2010 set 03]. Disponível em: http://www.malthus.com.br/artigos. asp?id=62&endpch=Marcas%20de%20mordi.

Aboshi H, Taylor JA, Takei T, Brown KA. Comparison of bitemarks in foodstuffs by computer imaging: a case report. J Forensic Odontostomatol. 1994; 12:41-4.

Nambiar P, Carson G, Taylor JA, Brown KA. Identification from a bitemark in a ward of chewing gum. J Forensic Odontostomatol. 2001; 19:5-8.

Bernitz H, Kloppers BA. Comparison microscope identification of a cheese bitemark: a case report. J Forensic Odontostomatol. 2002; 20:13-6.

Silva M. Perícias odontolegais. In: Figini ARL, Leitão e Silva JR, Jobim LF, Silva M. Identificação humana. 2ª ed. São Paulo: Millenuim; 2003. p.325-416.

Sweet D. Human bitemarks: examination, recovery and analysis. In: Bowers CM, Bell GL. Manual of forensic odontology. 3rd ed. Am Society Forensic Odontol; 1997; 148-69.

Nogi FM, Marques JAM, Melani RFH. Análise da utilização do software Adobe Photoshop no estudo e na interpretação de marcas de mordidas. RPG Rev Pos-Grad. 2003; 10:259.

Naether S, Buck U, Campana L, Breitbeck R, Thali M. The examination and identification of bite marks in foods using 3D scanning and 3D comparison methods. Int J Legal Med. 2011.

Meurer E. Oliveira MG, Meurer MI, Silva JVL, Santa Bárbara A, Heitz C. Biomodelos de prototipagem rápida em cirurgia e traumatologia bucomaxilofacial. Rev Bras Cir Per. 2007; 1:172- 80.

Meurer MI, Meurer E, Silva JVL, Bárbara AS, Nobre LF, Oliveira MG, et al. Aquisição e manipulação de imagens por tomografia computadorizada da região maxilofacial visando à obtenção de protótipos biomédicos. Radiol Bras. 2008; 41:49-54.

Foggiatto JA. O uso da prototipagem rápida na área médico-odontológica. [internet]. [acesso em 2010 set 11]. Disponível em: http://www. pessoal.utfpr.edu.br/foggiatto/arquivos/O_Uso_ da_Prototipagem_na_area_medico-odontologica. pdf.

Cavagnini G, Sansoni G, Angelo Vertuan A, Docchio F. 3D optical body scanning: application to forensic medicine and to maxillofacial reconstruction. International Conference on 3D Body Scanning Technologies; 2010; Switzerland. p.167-78.

Thali MJ, Braun M, Markwalder TH, Brueschweiler W, Zollinger U, Malik NJ, Yen K, Dirnhofer R. Bite mark documentation and analysis: the forensic 3D/CAD supported photogrammetry approach. J Forensic Sci. 2003; 135:115-21.

Martin-de-las-Heras S, Venezuela A, Ogayar C, Valverde J, Torres JC. Computer-based production of comparison overlays from 3D-scanned dental casts for bite mark analysis. J Forensic Sci. 2005; 50:1-7.

Blackwell SA, Taylor RV, Gordon I, Ogleby CL, Tanijiri T, Yoshino M, et al. 3D imaging and quantitative comparison of human dentitions and simulated bite marks. Int J Legal Med. 2007; 121:9-17.

Martin-de-las-Heras S, Tafur D. Comparison of simulated human dermal bitemarks possessing three-dimensional attributes to suspected biters using a proprietary three-dimensional comparison. J Forensic Int. 2009; 190:33-7.

Lasser AJ, Warnick AJ, Berman GM. Three- dimensional comparative analysis of bitemarks. J Forensic Sci. 2009; 54:658-61.

Stols G, Bernitz H. Reconstruction of deformed bite marks using affine transformations. J Forensic Sci. 2010; 55:784-7.

Tuceryan M, Li F, Blitzer HL, Parks ET, Platt JA. A framework for estimating probability of a match in forensic bite mark identification. J Forensic Sci. 2011; 56:83-9.

Santoro V, Lozito P, De Donno A, Introna F. Experimental study of bite mark injuries by digital analysis. J Forensic Sci. 2011; 56:224-8.

Clement JG, Blackwell SA. Is current bite mark analysis a misnomer? J Forensic Int. 2010; 190:33-7.

Avon SL, Victor C, Mayhall JT, Wood RE. Error rates in bite mark analysis in an in vivo animal model. J Forensic Int. 2010; 201:45-55.

Pretty AI. The barriers to achieving an evidence base for bitemark analysis. J Forensic Int. 2006; 159:S110–20.

Pretty IA, Sweet D. A paradigm shift in the analysis of bitemarks. J Forensic International. 2010; 201:38-44.

Silva INL, Beck JCP, Soares BGR, Burnett Jr LH, Beltrão MC. Associação de exame tomográfico e método de engenharia reversa para a confecção de estruturas dentárias e coroas protéticas. Rev Liberato. 2009; 10:7-13.

ABFO. ABFO Bitemarks Guideline. San Antonio: ABFO; 2009.

Oliveira DCA, Simões PS, Marques JAM, Galvão LCC, Oliveira RN, Musse JO. Avaliação de marcas de mordidas em alimentos produzidas por próteses dentárias. Arq Odontol. 2010; 46:38-42.

Published

2016-06-10

How to Cite

Nascimento, M. M., Sarmento, V. A., Beal, V. E., Galvão, L. C. C., & Marques, J. A. M. (2016). Human identification through bite marks in foods using reverse engineering and rapid prototyping: a simulated case. Arquivos Em Odontologia, 48(3). https://doi.org/10.7308/aodontol/2012.48.3.03

Issue

Section

Artigos

Most read articles by the same author(s)