Morphoagronomic characterization of common bean genotypes
7
Cad. Ciênc. Agrá., v. 15, p. 01–08, DOI: https://doi.org/10.35699/2447-6218.2024.46069
it exhibited early maturity, the latter genotype showed
low performance in the other evaluated traits, such as
L5P, W5P, and PROD (Table 3). In this case, the genetic
divergence found cannot be considered the main factor for
the indication of the parent for future crosses. Therefore,
it is recommended that the breeder selects parents that
already have desirable traits and possess the greatest
dissimilarity possible. Thus, it is recommended to cross
the FVP and Pronto Alívio varieties. The former stood out
in terms of early maturity, pod length and weight, while
Pronto Alívio showed the highest productivity.
To verify the ability of the dendrogram to repro-
duce the dissimilarity matrices, the cophenetic correlation
coefficient (CCC = 0.73) was estimated. According to
Carvalho et al. (2019), CCC values closer to unity indicate
better representation of the data set. Based on this, it was
observed that there was adequacy between the original
matrix and the resulting matrix from the clustering pro-
cess, proving the reliability of the dendrogram.
Conclusions
There was sufficient variability for the selection
of superior genotypes for all evaluated traits, except for
the number of pods per plant.
The genotype Pronto Alívio was the latest to
mature, but had the highest average pod yield.
The genotypes Pronto Alívio, Habichuela, Feijão
Vagem do Panamá, and Feijão-de-Metro out for their pod
length and weight, as well as for their above-average pro-
ductivity compared to the general mean of the evaluated
genotypes.
It is recommended to cross the varieties Feijão
Vagem do Panamá and Pronto Alívio in order to obtain
superior cultivars.
References
Al-Ashkar, I.; Alotaibi, M.; Refay, Y.; Ghazy, A.; Zakri, A.; Al-Doss, A.
2020. Selection criteria for high-yielding and early-flowering bread
wheat hybrids under heat stress. PLoS One, 15(8), e0236351. Doi:
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236351.
Almeida, S. N. C.; Thiebaut, J. T. L.; Gravina, G. D. A.; Araújo, L. C.;
Daher, R. F. 2014. Avaliação de características morfológicas e agronômi-
cas de linhagens de feijão-de-vagem em Bom Jesus do Itabapoana-RJ,
com potencial de recomendação. Vértices, v.16, n.1, p.39–50. Doi:
http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/1809-2667.20140003.
Aramendiz-Tatis, H.; Cardona-Ayala, C.; Espitia-Camacho, M.; Arrie-
ta-Puche, D.; Barba, A. G. 2018. Estimation of genetic parameters in
white seed cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L) Walp). Australian Journal
of Crop Science, 12(6), 1016–1022. Doi: https://doi.org/10.21475/
ajcs.18.12.06.p1105.
Ashinie S. K.; Tesfaye B.; Wakeyo G. K.; Fenta B. A.; Assefa E.; Greliche
N.; Machuka E. M.; Yao N. K. D. 2020. DArTSeq SNP-based markers
revealed high genetic diversity and structured population in Ethiopian
cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp] germplasms. PLOS One. 12;15
(10). Doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239122.
Carnib L. P. A. 2017. Caracterização da composição centesimal, minerais
e aceitação sensorial de genótipos de feijão-de-metro (Vigna unguiculata
ssp sesquipedalis) [dissertação de mestrado]. Teresina: Universidade
Federal do Piauí. 76 p.
Carvalho, P. R.; Munita, C. S.; Lapolli, A. L. 2019. Validity studies among
hierarchical methods of cluster analysis using cophenetic correlation
coefficient. Braz J Radiat Sci, 7(2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.15392/
bjrs.v7i2.501.
Cruz, C. D. 2013. GENES - a software package for analysis in expe-
rimental statistics and quantitative genetics. Acta Sci. Agron., 35(3),
p.271–276. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4025/actasciagron.v35i3.21251.
El-Mogy, M. M.; Kitinoja, L. 2019. Review of best postharvest practices
for fresh market green beans. PEF White Paper No. 19-01. La Pine,
Oregon, USA: The Postharvest Education Foundation; 19 p.
Gomes, G. R.; Moritz, A.; Freiria, G. H.; Furlan, F. F.; Takahashi, L. S. A.
2016. Desempenho produtivo de genótipos de feijão-vagem arbustivo
em dois ambientes. Scientia Agricola, 73(2) 85–92. Doi: http://dx.doi.
org/10.17224/SCiAGR.2016v7n2.p85-92.
Ha, T. J.; Lee, M. H.; Park, C. H.; Pae, S. B.; Shim, K. B.; Ko, J. M.; Shin,
S. O.; Baek, I. Y.; Park, K. Y. 2010. Identification and characterization
of anthocyanins in yard-long beans (Vigna unguiculata ssp. sesquipe-
dalis L.) by high-performance liquid chromatography with diode array
detection and electrospray ionization/mass spectrometry (HPLC-DAD-
-ESI/MS) analysis. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 58(4),
2571–2576. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jf904286y.
Lazaridi, E.; Ntatsi, G.; Savvas, D.; Bebeli, P. J. 2017. Diversity in co-
wpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.) local populations from Greece.
Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 64, 1529–1551. Doi: http://
dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10722-017-0522-2.
Mullins, A. P.; Arjmandi, B. H. 2021. Health benefits of plant-based
nutrition: focus on beans in cardiometabolic diseases. Nutrients, 13(2),
1–16. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu13020470.
Paiva, J. B.; Freire Filho, F. R.; Teófilo, E. M.; Ribeiro, V. Q. 2014.
Feijão-caupi: melhoramento genético no Centro de Ciências Agrárias.
Fortaleza: UFC.
Panchta, R.; Arya, R. K.; Vu, N. N.; Behl, R. K. 2021. Genetic diver-
gence in cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp) - an overview. Ekin
Journal of Crop Breeding and Genetics, 7(1), 1–20. Doi: https://doi.
org/10.29333/ejcbg/8967.
Peixoto, N.; Cardoso, A. I. I. 2016. Feijão-vagem. In: Nascimento, W.
M. (ed.). Hortaliças leguminosas. Brasília: Embrapa, 61–86.
R Core Team. 2022. R: A language and environment for statistical
computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
Retrieved from https://www.R-project.org/.
Santana, S. R. A.; Medeiros, J. E.; Anunciação Filho, C. J.; Silva, J. W.;
Costa, A. F.; Bastos, G. Q. 2019. Genetic divergence among cowpea ge-
notypes by morphoagronomic traits. Revista Caatinga, 32(3), 841–850.
Doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-21252019v32n320rc.