Learning and interpersonal relationship in Nursing distance learning
pandemic time report
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35699/2237-5864.2020.24719Keywords:
Distance learning, Teaching-learning, Interpersonal relationship, NursingAbstract
The pandemic situation in Portugal since March 2020, lead to the development of strategies for the adaptation to distance learning in higher education. The objective of this qualitative investigation, in report format, is to describe and analyze the participant’s experience (22 students and 2 teachers) of Degree in Nursing, in teaching-learning process, using virtual teaching exclusively as a learning space. Teachers reported their experience and created an online questionnaire for students, to assess the dimensions of learning and interpersonal relationships. From the obtained results, we emphasize that the adaptation wasn't difficult. However, teachers and students felt the need to expand their digital skills. The students reported a lower level of attention and motivation as obstacles to learning, as well as less satisfaction in interpersonal relationships, feeling this modality more difficult when compared to face-to-face teaching.
Downloads
References
ALQURASHI, Emtinan. Predicting student satisfaction and perceived learning within online learning environments. Distance Education, v. 40, n. 1, p. 133-148, 2019. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2018.1553562.
CABERO-ALMENARA, Julio; ARANCIBIA, Maria Luisa; PRETE, Annachiara del. Technical and Didactic Knowledge of the Moodle LMS in Higher Education. Beyond Functional Use. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, v. 8, n. 1, p. 25-33, 2019. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7821/naer.2019.1.327.
FONSECA, Cezar; FERNANDES, Catarina Costa. Educação presencial versus EaD: perspectivas dos alunos dos cursos de Serviços Públicos e Administração. Revista Científica em Educação à Distância, EaD em Foco, v. 7, n. 2, p. 78-91, 2017. ISSN 2177-8310 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18264/eadf.v7i2.556.
GONZALEZ, Liliana; GOMEZ, Maria Clara; ECHEVERRI, Jaime Alberto. Motivation and virtual education in Computer Science: case Universidad de Medellín-Colombia. IEEE Latin America Transactions, v. 15, n. 6, p. 1176-1181, june 2017. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TLA.2017.7932706.
GOSSENHEIMER, Agnes Nogueira; CASTRO, Mauro Silveira; CARNEIRO, Mara Lúcia Fernandes. Estudos comparativos entre educação à distância e presencial em cursos da área da Saúde: uma revisão. EmRede – Revista de Educação à Distância, v. 4, n. 1, p. 73-90, 2017. ISSN 2359-6082. Disponível em: https://www.aunirede.org.br/revista/index.php/emrede/article/view/186. Acesso em: 11 abr. 2020.
GROS, Begoña. The design of smart educational environments. Smart Learning Environments, v. 3, n. 15, 2016. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40561-016-0039-x.
KERIMBAYEV, Nurassyl. Virtual learning: possibilities and realization. Educ Inf Technol, v. 21, p. 1521-1533, 2016. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10639-015-9397-1.
KINCHIN, Ian. Avoiding technology-enhanced non-learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, v. 43, n. 2, p. E43-E48, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2011.01264.x.
KUO, Yu Chun; WALKER, Andrew; SCHRODER, Kerstin; BELLAND, Brian. Interaction, Internet self-efficacy, and self-regulated learning as predictors of student satisfaction in online education courses. Internet and Higher Education, v. 20, p. 35-50, 2014.
MARCHISIO Marina; RABELLINO Sergio; SPINELLO Enrico; TORBIDONE Gianluca. Advanced e-learning for IT-Army officers through virtual learning environments. Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge Society, v. 13, n. 3, p. 59-70, 2017. ISSN: 1826-6223, e-ISSN:1971-8829. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.20368/1971-8829/1382.
MARING, Joyce; COSTELLO, Ellen; PLACK, Margaret. Student outcomes in a Pathophysiology course based on mode of delivery: distance versus traditional classroom learning. Journal of Physical Therapy Education, v. 22, n. 1, p. 22-30, 2008. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00001416-200801000-00005.
OLIVEIRA, Natália; PROCACI, Thiago; SIQUEIRA, Sean. Captura da aceitação do blackboard e do tipo de motivação de alunos de cursos presenciais de Ciências Exatas em uma universidade privada. Revista Brasileira de Informática na Educação – RBIE, v. 28, p. 229-259, 2020. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5753/rbie.2020.28.0.229.
PÉREZ-PÉREZ, Marta; SERRANO-BEDIA, Ana; GARCÍA-PIQUERES, Gema. An analysis of factors affecting students´ perceptions of learning outcomes with Moodle. Journal of Further and Higher Education. 2019. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2019.1664730.
RIENTIES, Barte et al. Why some teachers easily learn to use a new virtual learning environment: a technology acceptance perspective. Interactive Learning Environments, v. 24, n. 3, p. 539-552, 2014. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2014.881394.
TEO, Timothy et al. Factors that influence university students’ intention to use Moodle: a study in Macau. Education Tech Research Dev, v. 67, p. 749-766, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09650-x.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Filomena Adelaide de Matos, Emília Costa

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal retain the copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which allows the sharing of work with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are authorized to take additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (e.g. publish in institutional repository or as a book chapter), with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Open access policy:
Revista Docência do Ensino Superior is an Open Access journal, which means that all content is available free of charge, at no cost to the user or their institution. Users may read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles, or use them for any other legal purpose, without seeking prior permission from the publisher or author, provided they respect the license to use the Creative Commons used by the journal. This definition of open access is in line with the Budapest Open Access Initiative (BOAI).

























