Epidemiological and clinical profile of patients with suspected sepsis and septic shock in a hospital emergency

Authors

  • Arilene Lohn Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina - UFSC, Hospital Universitário Polydoro Ernani de São Thiago - HU-UFSC. Florianópolis, SC - Brasil https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6952-912X
  • Marisa da Silva Martins Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina - UFSC, Hospital Universitário Polydoro Ernani de São Thiago - HU-UFSC. Florianópolis, SC - Brasil. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1495-1232
  • Leandro Teixeira Câmara Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina - UFSC, Hospital Universitário Polydoro Ernani de São Thiago - HU-UFSC. Florianópolis, SC - Brasil. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5959-1448
  • Luciana Bihain Hagemann de Malfussi Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina - UFSC, Hospital Universitário Polydoro Ernani de São Thiago - HU-UFSC. Florianópolis, SC - Brasil. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3199-9529
  • Daniele Delacanal Lazzari Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina - UFSC, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Enfermagem - PEN. Florianópolis, SC - Brasil. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1788-866X
  • Eliane Regina Pereira do Nascimento Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina - UFSC, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Enfermagem - PEN. Florianópolis, SC - Brasil. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2215-4222
  • Nara Reisdorfer Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina - UFSC, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Enfermagem - PEN. Florianópolis, SC - Brasil. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5637-8649

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5935/1415.2762.20210063

Keywords:

Nursing, Emergency Service, Hospital, Shock, Septic, Patient Care

Abstract

Objective: to analyze clinical and demographic characteristics and compliance with the ‘Surviving
Sepsis Campaign’ in suspected or confirmed cases of sepsis and septic shock recorded in medical records
of a hospital emergency. Method: quantitative, descriptive study. The sample consisted of 127 medical
records of adult patients admitted to a hospital emergency from June to October 2019. For data
analysis, frequencies, mean, standard deviation, chi-square test and Kruskal-Wallis test were used.
Results: the cases of sepsis and septic shock had the pulmonary as their main focus. The predominant
clinical diagnosis was infection with organ dysfunction. The predominant clinical outcome was
hospital discharge. The performance of measures recommended by the Sepsis Survival Campaign in
the first hour after the suspected diagnosis - collection of lactate, administration of antibiotics and
collection of blood cultures - was recorded in 10 (7.9%) medical records. Conclusion: knowledge of the
epidemiological characteristics of suspected or confirmed cases of sepsis and septic shock showed that
the clinical practice of the professionals involved was not in accordance with the conduct recommended
by the Surviving Sepsis Campaign.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1- Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymou CW, Shankar-Hari M, Annane

D, Bauer M, Bellomo R, et al. The Third International Consensus

Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA.

2016[citado em 2020 jul. 09];315(8):801-10. Disponível em: https://

jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2492881

2- Shankar-Hari M, Gary S, Phillips MAS, Seymour CW, Liu VX,

Deutschman CS, et al. Sepsis definitions task force. Developing a

new definition and assessing new clinical criteria for septic shock:

for the third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic

shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA. 2016[citado em 2021 ago. 15];315(8):775-

87. Disponível em: https://doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0289

3- Instituto Latino Americano de Sepse. Sepse: um problema de saúde

pública. São Paulo: ILAS; 2017[citado em 2020 jul. 09]. Disponível

em: http://diamundialdasepse.com.br/assets/downloads/Flyer-A5-

profissionais-saude.pdf

4- Instituto Latino Americano de Sepse. Relatório Nacional Implementação

de protocolos gerenciados sepse. São Paulo: ILAS; 2018[citado em

2020 jul. 09]. Disponível em: http://www.ilas.org.br/assets/arquivos/

relatorio-nacional/relatorio-nacional-final.pdf

5- Rhee C, Travis MJ, Hamad Y, Pande A, Varon J, O’Brien C, et al.

Prevalence, underlying causes, and preventability of sepsisassociated

mortality in US acute care hospitals. JAMA. 2019[citado

em 2021 jul. 26];2(2):1-14. Disponível em: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.

gov/30768188/ DOI: https://doi:10.1001/ jamanetworkopen.2018.7571

6- Klimpel J, Weidhase L, Bernhard M, Gries A, Petros S. The impact of

the Sepsis-3 definition on ICU admission of patients with infection.

Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2019[citado em 2020 jul.

09];27(98). Disponível em: https://sjtrem.biomedcentral.com/

articles/10.1186/s13049-019-0680-9

7- Zonta FNS, Velasquez PGA, Velasquez LG, Demetrio LS, Miranda

D, Silva MCBD. Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of

sepse in a public hospital of Paraná. Rev Epidemiol Control Infec.

2018[citado em 2020 jul. 08];8(3):224-31. Disponível em: https://

online.unisc.br/seer/index.php/epidemiologia/article/view/11438

8- Carneiro AH, Póvoa P, Gomes JA. Dear Sepsis-3, we are sorry to

say that we don’t like you. Rev Bras Ter Int. 2017[citado em 2020

jul. 09];29(1):4-8. Disponível em: https://www.scielo.br/scielo.

php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-507X2017000100004

9- Santos MCS, Sanches CT, Moraes URO, Albanese SPR, Carrilho

CMDM, Volpato MP, et al. Clinical aspects and the origin of sepsis

patients treated at a university hospital. Acta Paul Enferm. 2019[citado

em 2020 jul. 10];32(1):65-71. Disponível em: https://www.scielo.br/

scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-21002019000100065&lng=

en&nrm=iso&tlng=en

10- Malta M, Cardoso LO, Bastos FI, Magnanini MMF, Silva CMP. STROBE

initiative: guidelines on reporting observational studies. Rev Saúde Pública.

2010[citado em 2020 jul. 10];44(3):559-65. Disponível em: https://www.

scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-89102010000300021

11- Nassar SM, Wronscki VR, Ohira M. SEstatNet- Sistema Especialista

para o Ensino de Estatística na Web. Florianópolis: SEstatNet;

2020[citado em 2020 jul. 09]. Disponível em: http://sestatnet.ufsc.br

12- Levy MM, Evans LE, Rhodes A. The Surviving Sepsis Campaign

Bundle: 2018 update. Intensive Care Med. 2018[citado em

2020 jul.15];44:925-8 Disponível em: https://journals.lww.

com/ccmjournal/Fulltext/2018/06000/The_Surviving_Sepsis_

Campaign_Bundle_2018_Update.21.aspx

13- Carbó M, Fresco L, Osorio G, Monclús E, Ortega M. Predictors

of mortality in emergency department patients with sepsis scored

2 or 3 on the Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment scale.

Emergências. 2020[citado em 2020 jul. 05];32(3):169-76.

Disponível em: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32395924/

14- Santos AM, Souza GRBO, Oliveira AML. Sepsis in adult patients

in the intensive care unit: clinical characteristics. Arq Med Hosp

Fac Cienc Med Santa Casa São Paulo. 2016[citado em 2020 jul.

05];61:3-7. Disponível em: http://arquivosmedicos.fcmsantacasasp.

edu.br/index.php/AMSCSP/article/view/125/0

15- Barros LLS, Maia CSF, Monteiro MC. Risk factors associated

to sepsis severity in patients in the Intensive Care Unit. Cad Saúde Colet.

2016[citado em 2020 jul 05];24(4):388-96. Disponível em: https://www.

scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1414-462X2016000400388

16- Rhode A, Evans LE, Alhazzani W, Levy MM, Antonelli M, Ferrer

R, et al. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for

Manegement of Sepsis and Septic Shock: 2016. Intensive Care Med.

2017[citado em 2020 jul. 10];43:304-77. Disponível em: https://

journals.lww.com/ccmjournal/Fulltext/2017/03000/Surviving_

Sepsis_Campaign_International.15.aspx

17- West TE, Wikraiphat C, Tandhavanant S, Ariyaprasert P, Suntornsut P,

Okamoto S, et al. Patient characteristics, management, and predictors

of outcome from severe community-onset staphylococcal sepsis in

northeast Thailand: a prospective multicenter study. Am J Trop Med

Hyg. 2017[citado em 2020 jul. 05];96(5):1042-9. Disponível em:

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28167592/

18- Seymour CW, Gesten F, Prescott HC, Friedrich ME, Iwashyna TJ et al.

Time to treatment and mortality during mandated emergency care

for sepsis. N Engl J Med. 2017[citado em 2020 jul. 08];376:2235-

44. Disponível em: https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/

nejmoa1703058

19- Branco MJC, Lucas APM, Marques RMD, Sousa PP. The role of the

nurse in caring for the critical patient with sepsis. Rev Bras Enferm.

2020[citado em 2021 jul. 01];73(4) Disponível em: https://www.scielo.

br/j/reben/a/vpDRwFcxG6TFRXyZhyVtbXQ/?lang=pt&format=pdf

20- Carnio EC. New perspectives for the treatment of the patient

with sepsis. Rev Latino Am-Enferm. 2019[citado em 2020 jan.

08];27:e3082. Disponível em: https://www.scielo.br/scielo.

php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-11692019000100200

21- Trochet C, Techer V, Roudet A, Gavazzi G. Septic shock, organisation

and nursing care. Rev Infirm. 2020[citado em 2021 jun. 25];69(260-

261):22-4. Disponível em: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.

gov/32600590/

22- Brown RM, Semler MW. Fluid Management in Sepsis. J Intensive Care

Med. 2019[citado em 2021 jun. 26];34(5):364-73. Disponível em:

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0885066618784861

23- Souza ALT, Amário AAS, Covay DLA, Veloso LM, Silveira LM,

Stabile AM. Nurses’ knowledge on septic shock. Ciênc Cuid Saúde.

2018[citado em 2020 jul. 12];17(1):1-7. Disponível em: http://www.

periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/CiencCuidSaude/article/view/39895

24- Westphal GA, Pereira AB, Fachin SM, Barreto ACC, Bornschein

ACGJ, Caldeira FM. Characteristics and outcomes of patients with

community-acquired and hospital-acquired sepsis. Rev Bras Ter

Intensiva. 2019[citado em 2020 jul. 12];31(1):71-8. Disponível em:

https://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S0103-

507X2019000100071&lng=es&nrm=1

25- Fernandes TM, Ribeiro RM, Comin MF, Dagostin VS, Ceretta LB,

Tessmann M. Análise do perfil de pacientes que sobrevivem à sepse.

Rev Adm Saúde. 2021[citado em 2021 jul. 11];21(82):e279. Disponível

em: https://cqh.org.br/ojs-2.4.8/index.php/ras/article/view/279/412

Published

2021-11-18

Issue

Section

Research

How to Cite

1.
Epidemiological and clinical profile of patients with suspected sepsis and septic shock in a hospital emergency. REME Rev Min Enferm. [Internet]. 2021 Nov. 18 [cited 2026 Apr. 15];25. Available from: https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/reme/article/view/54974

Most read articles by the same author(s)