Wonder, Ambivalence and Heterotopia: The City in Shakespeare’s The Merchant of Venice
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17851/2317-2096.28.3.29-45Keywords:
Shakespeare, The Merchant of Venice, heterotopiaAbstract
This essay proposes a discussion of the representation of Venice in William Shakespeare’s The Merchant of Venice, addressing the city as a site of ambivalence and cultural interrogation. It examines how Shakespeare drew on the “myth of Venice” to create a space into which Renaissance anxieties about justice, gender, religion and finances were projected. Michel Foucault’s concept of heterotopia is applied here to show how representations of Venice are used to mirror Elizabethan and Jacobean society. The essay also proposes an analysis of how the Italian city-state is rendered in Michael Radford’s filmic adaptation of Shakespeare’s play, with special attention to the images of the prostitutes in the film, and the ambivalent portrayal of the justice system during the courtroom scene.
Downloads
References
AUDEN, W. H. Brothers and Others. In: WHEELER, Thomas (Ed.). The Merchant of Venice: Critical Essays. New York: Routledge, 2015. p. 59-78.
BELSEY, Catherine. Love in Venice. In: ALEXANDER, Catherine M. S. (Ed.). The Cambridge Shakespeare Library: Shakespeare Criticism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003. v. 2. p. 103-114.
BROWN, John Russell. The Realization of Shylock. In: WHEELER, Thomas (Ed.). The Merchant of Venice: Critical Essays. London, New York: Routledge, 2015. p. 263-292.
CONTARINI, Gaspare. The Commonwealth and Government of Venice. Trans. Lewis Lewkenor. London: Iohn Windet, 1599.
DERRIDA, Jacques. What is a “Relevant” Translation?. Trans. Lawrence Venuti. In: VENUTI, Lawrence. The Translation Studies Reader. 2. ed. New York: Routledge, 2005. p. 423-466.
DRAKAKIS, John. Introduction. In: SHAKESPEARE, William. The Merchant of Venice. Ed. John Drakakis. London: Arden Shakespeare, 2010. p. 1-159. (The Arden Shakespeare. Third Series)
FOUCAULT, Michel. Of Other Spaces: Utopias and Heterotopias. Trans. Jay Miskowiec. Available from: web.mit.edu/allanmc/www/foucault1. Access: 15 June 2018.
GALERY, Maria Clara V. Shylock and Michael Radford’s film version of The Merchant of Venice: Perspectives of a Historically Challenging Role. Scripta Uniandrade, Curitiba, n. 5, p. 85-102, 2007.
GILBERT, Felix. Venetian Secrets. New York Review of Books, New York, p. 37-39, 16 July 1987.
GILLIES, John. Shakespeare and the Geography of Difference. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.
HAZLITT, William. A View of the English Stage. London: Robert Stoddart, 1818.
HELIODORA, Barbara. Falando de Shakespeare. São Paulo: Perspectiva, 1997.
HOLQUIST, Michael (Ed.). The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays by M.M. Bakhtin. Trans. Caryl Emerson and Michael Holquist. Austin: University of Texas, Press, 1981.
HUTCHEON, Linda. A Theory of Adaptation. New York: Routledge, 2006.
MAGNUS, Laury. Michael Radford’s The Merchant of Venice and the Vexed Question or Performance. Literature/Film Quarterly, [Salisbury], v. 35, n. 2, p. 108-120, 2007.
MOISAN, Thomas. “Which is the merchant here? and which the Jew” Subversion and recuperation in The Merchant of Venice. In: HOWARD, J. E.; O’CONNOR M. F. (Ed.). Shakespeare Reproduced: The Text in History and Ideology. London: Routledge, 1987. p. 188-206.
PLATT, Peter G. Shakespeare and the Culture of Paradox: Studies in Performance and Early Modern Drama. Surrey: Ashgate, 2009.
SHAKESPEARE, William. The Merchant of Venice. Ed. John Drakakis. London: Arden Shakespeare, 2010. (The Arden Shakespeare. Third Series)
THE MERCHANT of Venice. Director: Michael Radford. [New York?]:Sony Pictures Classics, 2004.1 DVD (131 min.), son., color.
VAUGHAN, Virginia M. Othello: A Contextual History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Maria Clara Versiani Galery (Autor)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
