Performance of the expert committee in the cultural adaptation of the diabetesempowerment scale-short form (des-sf)

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5935/1415-2762.20170053

Keywords:

Diabetes Mellitus, Surveys and Questionnaires, Translating, Education Nursing, Public Health Nursing

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study is to describe a methodological proposal for the performance of expert committees via an electronic questionnaire implemented and tested in the cultural adaptation of the Diabetes Empowerment Scale-Short Form instrument. Method: A methodological study was carried out with 38 specialists from the areas of linguistics and health sciences who evaluated the instrument translated via electronic questionnaire, developed and applied through e-Surv web tool. The level of acceptance of experts on the answers to the questionnaire was evaluated by absolute and relative frequencies and the level of agreement among the experts was evaluated by calculating the Cohen-Fleisss Kappa coefficient. The analyses were carried out in the statistical programming environment R. Results: Interdisciplinary collaboration, coupled with the online data collection methodology resulted in heterogeneous opinions, which generated a low agreement between the experts in the adaptation of the translated instrument. However, it is believed that this diversity of opinions generated suggestions that have enriched the translation process. Conclusion: The use of the online tool proved to be reliable, safe and effective in the dynamics of the experts to evaluate health instruments.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Epstein J, Osborned RH, Elsworthd GR, Beatone DE, Guillemin F. Crosscultural adaptation of the health education impact questionnaire: experimental study showed expert committee, not back-translation, added value. J Clin Epidemiol. 2015[citado em 2015 dez. 30];68(4):360-9. Disponível em: http://www.jclinepi.com/article/S0895-4356(13)00305-3/pdf

2. Holmes S. Methodological and ethical considerations in designing and internet study of quality of life: a discussion paper. IJNS. 2009[citado em 2015 jun. 16];46(3):394-405. Disponível em: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020748908002071

3. Toledo D, Aerny N, Soldevila N, Baricot M, Godoy P, Castilla J, et al. Mananging an online survey about influenza vaccination in primary healthcare workers. In J Environ Res Public Health. 2015[citado em 2017 abr. 20];12:541-53. Disponível em: http://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/12/1/541/htm

4. Park C, Park, YH. Validity and reliability of korean version of health empowerment scale (K-HES) for older adults. Asian Nurs Res. 2013[citado em 2015 jan. 14];7:142-8. Disponível em: http://www.asian-nursingresearch.com/article/S1976-1317(13)00040-6/pdf

5. Anderson RM, Funnell MM. Patient empowerment: myths and misconceptions. Patient Educ Couns. 2010[citado em 2015 jan. 14];79(3):277-82. Disponível em: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0738399109003279

6. Clark ML, Utz SW. Use of diabetes self-management instruments among rural african american populations. SOJNR. 2011[citado em 2015 jan. 14];11(1). Disponível em: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/10cc/ac90220e375c470978b06812ee2a71da4cfe.pdf

7. Williams IC, Utz SW, Hinton I, Yan G, Jones R, Reid K. Enhancing diabetes self-care among rural african americans with diabetes: results of a two-year culturally tailored intervention. Diab Educ. 2014[citado em 2015 maio 05];40(2):231-9. Disponível em: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4692724/pdf/nihms744516.pdf

8. Peña-Purcell NC, May M, Boggess MN. An application of a diabetes knowledge scale for low-literate hispanic/latinos. Health Promot Pract. 2014[citado em 2015 jan. 14];15(2):252-62. Disponível em: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1524839912474006?journalCode=hppa

9. Tol A, Shojaeezadeh D, Sharifirad G, Alhani F, Tehrani MM. Determination of empowerment score in type 2 diabetes patients and its related factors. J Pak Med Assoc. 2012[citado em 2015 jan. 14];62(1):16-20. Disponível em: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22352094

10. Tol A, Baghbanian A, Mohebbi B, Shojaeizadeh D, Azam K, Shahmirzadi SE, et al. Empowerment assessment and influential factors among patients with type 2 diabetes. J Diab Metab Disord. 2013[citado em 2015 jan. 14];12(6):1-5. Disponível em: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3598211/pdf/2251-6581-12-6.pdf

11. Buchanan E, Hvizdak EE. Online survey tools: ethical and methodological concernsof human research ethics committees. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2009[citado em 2015 maio 05];4(2):37-48. Disponível em: http://www.pitt.edu/~peterb/papers/JER0402_05.pdf

12. Fleiss JL. Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters. Psychol Bull. 1971[citado em 2015 jan. 15];76(5):378-82. Disponível em: http://psycnet.apa.org/index.cfm?fa=buy.optionToBuy&id=1972-05083-001

13. R Core Team. R Foundation For Statistical Computing. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: Foundation For Statistical Computing; 2015. [citado em 2015 jan. 15]. Disponível em: http://www.R-project.org

14. Schuler M, Musekamp G, Faller H, Ehlebracht-KonigI, Gutenbrunner C, Kirchhof R, et al. Assessment of proximal outcomes of self-management programs translation and psychometric evaluation of a german version of the health education impact (heiQTM). Qual Life Res. 2013[citado em 2015 maio 05];22(6):1391-403. Disponível em: http://dro.deakin.edu.au/eserv/DU:30052480/osborne-assessmentofproximal-2013.pdf

15. Pelegrino FM, Dantas RAS, Corbi ISA, Carvalho ARS, Schmidt A, Pereira Filho A. Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric properties of the brazilian-portuguese version of the duke anticoagulation satisfaction scale. J Clin Nurs. 2011[citado em 2015 jan. 15];21:2509-17. Disponível em: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22077911

16. Stewart AL, Angela D, Thrasher AD, Goldberg J, Shea JAA. Framework for understanding modifications to measures for diverse populations. J Aging Health. 2012[citado em 2015 jan. 15];24(6):992-1017. Disponível em: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3768261/pdf/nihms478473.pdf

17. Cinar FI, Cinar M, Yilmaz S, Acikel C, Erdem H, Pay S, et al. Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity of the turkish version of the compliance questionnaire on rheumatology in patients with behçet's disease. J Transcult Nurs. 2016[citado em 2017 jan. 05];27(5):480-6. Disponível em: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25801762

18. Domingos CS, Moura PC, Braga, LM, Rodrigues NV, Correia MDL, Carvalho AMP. Construction and validation of the historical contents of nursing guided by Orem reference. REME - Rev Min Enferm. 2015[citado em 2017 maio 09];19(2):176-86. Disponível em: http://www.reme.org.br/artigo/detalhes/1013

19. Davis LL. Instrument review: getting the most from a panel of experts. Applied Nurs Res. 1992[citado em 2015 fev. 03];5(4):194-7. Disponível em: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0897189705800084

20. Alexandre NMC, Coluci, MZO. Content validity in the development and adaptation processes of measurement instruments. Ciênc Saúde Coletiva. 2011[citado em 2015 fev. 13];16(7):3061-8. Disponível em: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-81232011000800006

21. Bernardo EBR, Catunda HLO, Oliveira MF, Lessa PRA, Ribeiro SG, Pinheiro AKB. Methodological approach to translation and adaptation of scales in the area of sexual and reproductive health: an integrative review. Rev Bras Enferm. 2013[citado em 2015 dez. 30];66(4):5592-8. Disponível em: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-71672013000400019

22. Yang C, Kasales CJ, Ouyang T, Peterson CM, Sarwani NI,Tappouni R, et al. A succinct rating scale for radiology report quality. SAGE Open Medicine. 2014[citado em 2015 maio 05];1-10. Disponível: em: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4712750/pdf/10.1177_2050312114563101.pdf

23. Delgado ER, Carretero HD, Ruch W. Content validity evidences in test development: an applied perspective. J Clin Health Psychol. 2012[citado em 2015 jan. 14];12(3):449-60. Disponível em: http://www.zora.uzh.ch/64551/1/ijchp-421.pdf

24. McPeake J, Bateson M, O'Neill A. Electronic surveys: how to maximise success. Nurse Researcher. 2014[citado em 2015 maio 05];21(3):24-6. Disponível em: http://www.florence-nightingale-foundation.org.uk/uploads/Joanne_McPeake_Nurse_Researcher_Jan_2014_vol_1_num_3.pdf

25. Fujimori E, Higuchi CH, Cursino EG, Veríssimo MLÓR, Borges ALV, Mello DF, et al. Ensino da estratégia atenção integrada às doenças prevalentes na infância na graduação em enfermagem. Rev Latino-Am Enferm. 2013[citado em 2015 fev. 20];21(3):655-62. Disponível em: http://www.scielo.br/pdf/rlae/v21n3/pt_0104-1169-rlae-21-03-0655.pdf

26. Costa RKS, Torres GV, Salvetti MG, Azevedo IC, Costa MAT. To validate the content of two instruments used to evaluate nursing care for people with skinlesions. Acta Paul Enferm. 2014[citado em 2015 fev. 13];27(5):447- 57. Disponível em: http://www.scielo.br/pdf/ape/v27n5/1982-0194-ape-027-005-0447.pdf

Downloads

Published

2018-03-05

Issue

Vol. 21 (2017)

Section

Research

License

Copyright (c) 2018 Reme: Revista Mineira de Enfermagem

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

1.
Torres H de C, Barroso RADA, Pagano AS, Reis IA, Rodrigues JSN. Performance of the expert committee in the cultural adaptation of the diabetesempowerment scale-short form (des-sf). REME Rev Min Enferm. [Internet]. 2018 Mar. 5 [cited 2026 Oct. 17];21. Available from: https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/reme/article/view/49845

Most read articles by the same author(s)