Undergraduate ESL students' use and perceptions of ChatGPT for academic writing purposes

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-3652.2025.58320

Keywords:

ChatGPT, AI-writing tools, AI literacy, Academic writing, Undergraduate ESL learners’ perceptions

Abstract

While research on ChatGPT’s role in instruction has witnessed rapid growth in recent years, fewer studies have paid attention to exploring undergraduate students’ perceptions of ChatGPT in English as a Second Language (ESL) academic writing contexts. To address this gap, the current study aimed to survey undergraduate ESL students’ use of ChatGPT for academic writing and their perceptions of its trustworthiness and utility. An intact class enrolled in an intensive academic writing course at a public science and engineering institute in India participated in the survey. Employing Likert-scale and multiple-choice questions, along with an open-ended item, the study collected data from 51 (13 female and 38 male) respondents and analysed it using descriptive statistics to identify trends and patterns in participants’ responses. Most respondents reported that they regularly used ChatGPT to generate and review academic texts. They appeared to express caution regarding the trustworthiness of its responses to academic writing queries and acknowledged its mechanised accuracy in summarising and correcting grammar and vocabulary mistakes. Though their confidence levels in using ChatGPT were moderate, most of them expressed willingness to use it more frequently for academic writing in the future. The findings indicate undergraduate ESL students’ increasing reliance on ChatGPT and their perceptions of its strengths and limitations as a supportive academic writing tool, implying the need for guidance in its effective and ethical use.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ABUSA’ALEEK, Atef O.; ALENIZI, Aied. Unveiling postgraduates’ perspectives on using ChatGPT as a tool for learning in higher education. Teaching English with Technology, v. 24, n. 3, p. 4–17, 2024. DOI: 10.56297/vaca6841/BFFO7057/NXQR9614.

ALALAMI, S. E. EFL learners’ attitudes towards utilizing ChatGPT for acquiring writing skills in higher education: A case study of computing students. Journal of Language Teaching & Research, v. 15, n. 4, 2024. DOI: 10.17507/jltr.1504.01.

ALKAMEL, M. A. A.; ALWAGIEH, N. A. S. Utilizing an adaptable artificial intelligence writing tool (ChatGPT) to enhance academic writing skills among Yemeni university EFL students. Social Sciences &Humanities Open, v. 10, p. 101095, 2024. DOI: 10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.101095.

ALLEN, T. J.; MIZUMOTO, A. ChatGPT over my friends: Japanese English-as-a-Foreign-Language learners’ preferences for editing and proofreading strategies. RELC Journal, 2024. DOI: 10.1177/00336882241262533.

BARROT, J. S. Using ChatGPT for second language writing: Pitfalls and potentials. Assessing Writing, v. 57, p. 100745, 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.asw.2023.100745.

BEKTUROVA, Madina; TULEPOVA, Saule; ZHAITAPOVA, Altnay. Predicting Kazakhstani TEFL students’ continuance intention towards using ChatGPT in academic writing. Education and Information Technologies, v. 30, n. 9, p. 11889–11909, 2025. DOI: 10.1007/s10639-024-13306-6.

CHELLAPPA, V.; LUXIMON, Y. Understanding the perception of design students towards ChatGPT. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, v. 7, p. 100281, Feb. 2024. DOI: 10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100281.

CHIA, C. S.; PHAN, J.; HARRY, O.; LEE, K. M. Graduate Students’ Perception and Use of ChatGPT as a Learning Tool to Develop Writing Skills. International Journal of TESOL Studies, v. 6, n. 3, p. 113–127, 2024. DOI: 10.58304/ijts.20240308.

ČRČEK, N.; PATEKAR, J. Writing with AI: University students’ use of ChatGPT. Journal of Language and Education, v. 9, 4 (36), p. 128–138, 2023. DOI: 10.17323/jle.2023.17379.

CRESWELL, John W.; CRESWELL, J. David. Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. [S. l.]: Sage Publications, 2017.

DEMPERE, J.; MODUGU, K.; HESHAM, A.; RAMASAMY, L. K. The impact of ChatGPT on higher education. Frontiers in Education, v. 8, p. 1206936, 2023. DOI: 10.3389/feduc.2023.1206936.

DUONG, T. N. A.; CHEN, H. L. An AI Chatbot for EFL Writing: Students’ Usage Tendencies, Writing Performance, and Perceptions. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 2025. DOI: 10.1177/07356331241312363.

ELEBYARY, K.; SHABARA, R. ChatGPT-generated corrective feedback: Does it do what it says on the tin? Teaching English with Technology, v. 24, n. 3, p. 68–89, 2024. DOI: 10.56297/vaca6841//BFFO7057/MYEH4562.

ELSAYARY, A. An investigation of teachers’ perceptions of using ChatGPT as a supporting tool for teaching and learning in the digital era. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, v. 40, n. 3, p. 931–945, 2024. DOI: 10.1111/jcal.12926.

GHIASVAND, F.; KOGANI, M.; ALIPOOR, A. “I’m not ready for this metamorphosis”: An ecological approach to Iranian and Italian EFL teachers’ readiness for artificial intelligence-mediated instruction. Teaching English with Technology, v. 24, n. 3, p. 18–40, 2024. DOI: 10.56297/vaca6841//BFFO7057/ISKI2001.

HIGGS, J. M.; STORNAIUOLO, A. Being Human in the Age of Generative AI: Young People’s Ethical Concerns about Writing and Living with Machines. Reading Research Quarterly, 2024. DOI: 10.1002/rrq.552.

IMRAN, M.; ALMUSHARRAF, N. Analyzing the role of ChatGPT as a writing assistant at higher education level: A systematic review of the literature. Contemporary Educational Technology, v. 15, n. 4, ep464, 2023. DOI: 10.30935/cedtech/13605.

KLIMOVA, B.; CAMPOS, V. P. L. de. University undergraduates’ perceptions on the use of ChatGPT for academic purposes: evidence from a university in Czech Republic. Cogent Education, v. 11, n. 1, p. 2373512, 2024. DOI: 10.1080/2331186x.2024.2373512.

KOLTOVSKAIA, S.; RAHMATI, P.; SAELI, H. Graduate students’ use of ChatGPT for academic text revision: Behavioral, cognitive, and affective engagement. Journal of Second Language Writing, v. 65, p. 101130, 2024. DOI: 10.1016/j.jslw.2024.101130.

LEE, Y. J. Can my writing be polished further? When ChatGPT meets human touch. ELT Journal, v. 78, n. 4, p. 401–413, 2024. DOI: 10.1093/elt/ccae039.

MAHAPATRA, S. Impact of ChatGPT on ESL students’ academic writing skills: a mixed methods intervention study. Smart Learning Environments, v. 11, n. 1, p. 9, 2024. DOI: 10.1186/s40561-024-00295-9.

MENIADO, J. C.; HUYEN, D. T. T.; PANYADILOKPONG, N.; LERTKOMOLWIT, P. Using ChatGPT for second language writing: Experiences and perceptions of EFL learners in Thailand and Vietnam. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, v. 7, p. 100313, 2024. DOI: 10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100313.

MOGAVI, R. H.; DENG, C.; KIM, J. J.; ZHOU, P.; KWON, Y. D.; METWALLY, A. H. S.; HUI, P. ChatGPT in education: A blessing or a curse? A qualitative study exploring early adopters’ utilisation and perceptions. Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans, v. 2, n. 1, p. 100027, 2024. DOI: 10.1016/j.chbah.2023.100027.

PUNAR ÖZÇELIK, N.; YANGIN EKŞI, G. Cultivating writing skills: the role of ChatGPT as a learning assistant—a case study. Smart Learning Environments, v. 11, n. 1, p. 10, 2024. DOI: 10.1186/s40561-024-00296-8.

ROBILLOS, R. Synergizing Generative Pre-Trained Transformer (GPT) Chatbots in a Process-Based Writing Paradigm to Enhance University Students’ Writing Skills. Journal of Language and Education, v. 10, n. 3, p. 79–94, 2024. DOI: 10.17323/jle.2024.18708.

SHOUFAN, A. Exploring students’ perceptions of ChatGPT: Thematic analysis and follow-up survey. IEEE Access, v. 11, p. 38805–38818, 2023. DOI: 10.1109/access.2023.3268224.

STRIELKOWSKI, W.; GREBENNIKOVA, V.; LISOVSKIY, A.; RAKHIMOVA, G.; VASILEVA, T. AI-driven adaptive learning for sustainable educational transformation. Sustainable Development, 2024. DOI: 10.1002/sd.3221.

SZABÓ, F.; SZOKE, J. How does generative AI promote autonomy and inclusivity in language teaching? ELT Journal, v. 78, n. 4, p. 478–488, 2024. DOI: 10.1093/elt/ccae052.

TENG, M. F. “ChatGPT is the companion, not enemies”: EFL learners’ perceptions and experiences in using ChatGPT for feedback in writing. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, v. 7, p. 100270, 2024. DOI: 10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100270.

TENG, M. F. A Systematic Review of ChatGPT for English as a Foreign Language Writing: Opportunities, Challenges, and Recommendations. International Journal of TESOL Studies, v. 6, n. 3, 2024. DOI: 10.58304/ijts.20240304.

THORP, H. H. ChatGPT is fun, but not an author. Science, v. 379, n. 6630, p. 313–313, 2023. DOI: 10.1126/science.adg7879.

WANG, L.; CHEN, X.; WANG, C.; XU, L.; SHADIEV, R.; LI, Y. ChatGPT’s capabilities in providing feedback on undergraduate students’ argumentation: A case study. Thinking Skills and Creativity, v. 51, p. 101440, 2024. DOI: 10.1016/j.tsc.2023.101440.

XIAO, Y.; ZHI, Y. An exploratory study of EFL learners’ use of ChatGPT for language learning tasks: Experience and perceptions. Languages, v. 8, n. 3, p. 212, 2023. DOI: 10.3390/languages8030212.

XUE, V. W.; LEI, P.; CHO, W. C. The potential impact of ChatGPT in clinical and translational medicine. Clinical and Translational Medicine, v. 13, n. 3, 2023. DOI: 10.1002/ctm2.1216.

YUAN, Y.; LI, H.; SAWAENGDIST, A. The impact of ChatGPT on learners in English academic writing: opportunities and challenges in education. Language Learning in Higher Education, v. 14, n. 1, p. 41–56, 2024. DOI: 10.1515/cercles-2023-0006.

ZOU, Xiaozhu; SU, Ping; LI, Lexing; FU, Ping. AI-generated content tools and students’ critical thinking: Insights from a Chinese university. IFLA Journal, v. 50, n. 2, p. 228–241, Dec. 2023. DOI: 10.1177/03400352231214963.

Downloads

Published

2025-09-05

How to Cite

PINNINTI, Lakshmana Rao. Undergraduate ESL students’ use and perceptions of ChatGPT for academic writing purposes. Texto Livre, Belo Horizonte-MG, v. 18, p. e58320, 2025. DOI: 10.1590/1983-3652.2025.58320. Disponível em: https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/textolivre/article/view/58320. Acesso em: 24 dec. 2025.