Determinantes do uso da Inteligência Artificial Generativa na aprendizagem de línguas entre futuros professores de inglês como língua estrangeira
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-3652.2026.62909Palavras-chave:
Inglês como Língua Estrangeira, Aprendizagem da Língua Inglesa, Inteligência artificial generativa, Futuros professores de EFLResumo
A integração da tecnologia na educação tem transformado os paradigmas tradicionais de ensino, especialmente no aprendizado de línguas. Este estudo tem como foco o papel das ferramentas de inteligência artificial (IA) generativa, como o ChatGPT, enquanto recursos inovadores que facilitam a aprendizagem de línguas, oferecendo feedback instantâneo, prática de conversação e caminhos personalizados. Esta pesquisa investiga os fatores que influenciam o uso da IA generativa, em particular o ChatGPT, entre professores de Inglês como Língua Estrangeira (English as a Foreign Language – EFL) em formação na Indonésia. Utilizando o Modelo de Aceitação de Tecnologia (Technology Acceptance Model – TAM), o estudo explora percepções de utilidade, facilidade de uso e outros determinantes críticos que afetam a aceitação dessas ferramentas em ambientes de aprendizado de línguas. Foi adotada uma abordagem quantitativa, coletando dados de 785 futuros professores de EFL em três universidades indonésias por meio de uma pesquisa online distribuída via plataformas universitárias e redes sociais. Um questionário estruturado, baseado nos construtos do TAM e na literatura relevante, foi desenvolvido. A análise dos dados foi realizada por meio da Modelagem de Equações Estruturais por Mínimos Quadrados Parciais (Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling – PLS-SEM) com o software SmartPLS 4. Os resultados mostraram que nove das treze hipóteses iniciais receberam suporte empírico, destacando a importância de vários fatores na adoção da IA generativa entre futuros professores de EFL. A intenção de usar a IA emergiu como um forte preditor do comportamento de uso real, corroborando a literatura existente sobre emprego de tecnologia e reforçando a relevância das intenções dos aprendizes ao se engajarem com novas tecnologias.
Downloads
Referências
ALDOSARI, Share Aiyed M. The Future of Higher Education in the Light of Artificial Intelligence Transformations. International Journal of Higher Education, v. 9, n. 3, p. 145–151, June 2020. DOI: 10.5430/ijhe.v9n3p145.
ALFADDA, Hind Abdulaziz; MAHDI, Hassan Saleh. Measuring Students’ Use of Zoom Application in Language Course Based on the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, v. 50, n. 4, p. 883–900, 2021. DOI: 10.1007/s10936-020-09752-1.
ALI, Omar et al. The Effects of Artificial Intelligence Applications in Educational Settings: Challenges and Strategies. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, v. 199, p. 123076, 2024. DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2023.123076.
ARIF, Tubagus Zam Zam Al; SULISTIYO, Urip; WACHYUNNI, Sri. EFL University Students’ Self-Directed Language Learning with ICT: A Structural Equation Modelling Approach. Hachetetepé. Revista Científica de Educación y Comunicación, n. 29, p. 1–21, 2024. DOI: 10.25267/Hachetetepe.2024.i29.1104.
AYYOUB, Abdalkarim et al. Drivers of Acceptance of Generative AI Through the Lens of the Extended Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, v. 2025, n. 1, p. 1–19, 2025. DOI: 10.1155/hbe2/9974365.
CHUGAI, Oksana; LYTOVCHENKO, Iryna; SYNEKOP, Oksana. University Teachers’ Perceptions, Experiences and Implication for Using ChatGPT in ESL. Texto Livre, v. 18, p. 1–15, 2025. DOI: 10.1590/1983-3652.2025.53767.
CROMPTON, Helen; BURKE, Diane. Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education: The State of the Field. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, v. 20, n. 1, 2023. DOI: 10.1186/s41239-023-00392-8.
DAVIS, Fred D. Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, v. 13, n. 3, p. 319–340, 1989. DOI: 10.2307/249008.
DOĞRU, Erdoğan; ÖZEN, Raşit. Effects of Using the Staged Self-Directed Learning Model at Distance English Learning. Participatory Educational Research, v. 10, n. 1, p. 1–16, Jan. 2023. DOI: 10.17275/per.23.1.10.1.
GIRAY, Louie et al. Acceptance of and Satisfaction with ChatGPT as Learning Tool in Higher Education Through the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM): A Case from the Philippines. Internet Reference Services Quarterly, p. 1–20, 2025. DOI: 10.1080/10875301.2025.2470484.
GUETTALA, Manel et al. Generative Artificial Intelligence in Education: Advancing Adaptive and Personalized Learning. Acta Informatica Pragensia, v. 13, n. 3, p. 460–489, 2024. DOI: 10.18267/j.aip.243.
HAIR, Joe F.; HOWARD, Matthew C.; NITZL, Christian. Assessing Measurement Model Quality in PLS-SEM Using Confirmatory Composite Analysis. Journal of Business Research, v. 109, p. 101–110, Mar. 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.11.069.
HAIR, Joseph F.; HULT, G. Tomas M.; RINGLE, Christian M.; SARSTEDT, Marko; DANKS, Nicholas P.; RAY, Soumya. Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) Using R. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-80519-7.
HAIR, Joseph F.; RISHER, Jeffrey J.; SARSTEDT, Marko; RINGLE, Christian M. When to Use and How to Report the Results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, v. 31, n. 1, p. 2–24, 2019. DOI: 10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203.
HU, Li-tze; BENTLER, Peter M. Cutoff Criteria for Fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis: Conventional Criteria Versus New Alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, v. 6, n. 1, p. 1–55, 1999. DOI: 10.1080/10705519909540118.
HUANG, Fang; PENG, Dingyang; TEO, Timothy. AI Affordances and EFL Learners’ Speaking Engagement: The Moderating Roles of Gender and Learner Type. European Journal of Education, v. 60, n. 1, 2025. DOI: 10.1111/ejed.70025.
JIANG, Michael Yi Chao; JONG, Morris Siu-Yung; LAU, Wing Kwan; CHAI, Ching Sing; WU, Ning; CHEN, Min. Validating the General Extended Technology Acceptance Model for E-Learning: Evidence From an Online English as a Foreign Language Course Amid COVID-19. Frontiers in Psychology, v. 12, p. 671615, 2021. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.671615.
KARAN, Bablu; CHAKMA, Chitra. Influence of Higher Education Students’ Perceived Behaviour on Their Artificial Intelligence Acceptance: An Empirical Investigation Using Technology Acceptance Model. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, ahead-of-print, ahead-of-print, 2025. DOI: 10.1108/JARHE-08-2024-0478.
LEE, Yong-Jik; DAVIS, Robert O.; LEE, Sun Ok. University Students’ Perceptions of Artificial Intelligence-Based Tools for English Writing Courses. Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, v. 14, n. 1, e202405, Feb. 2024. DOI: 10.30935/ojcmt/14166.
LIU, Guangxiang; MA, Chaojun. Measuring EFL Learners’ Use of ChatGPT in Informal Digital Learning of English Based on the Technology Acceptance Model. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, v. 18, n. 2, p. 125–138, Mar. 2024. DOI: 10.1080/17501229.2023.2290316.
MOORHOUSE, Benjamin Luke et al. Developing Language Teachers’ Professional Generative AI Competence: An Intervention Study in an Initial Language Teacher Education Course. System, v. 125, p. 103399, 2024. DOI: 10.1016/j.system.2024.103399.
MUSTOFA, Rochman Hadi et al. Extending the Technology Acceptance Model: The Role of Subjective Norms, Ethics, and Trust in AI Tool Adoption Among Students. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, v. 8, p. 100370, June 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100370.
NAGY, Adrian Szilard et al. An Exploratory Study of Artificial Intelligence Adoption in Higher Education. Cogent Education, v. 11, n. 1, 2024. DOI: 10.1080/2331186X.2024.2332915.
PINNINTI, Lakshmana Rao. Undergraduate ESL Students’ Use and Perceptions of ChatGPT for Academic Writing Purposes. Texto Livre, v. 18, p. 1–17, 2025. DOI: 10.1590/1983-3652.2025.55369.
SARI, Nara; SULISTYO, Teguh. EFL Teachers’ Perspectives on Mobile-Assisted Language Learning (MALL) Resources for Vocational High School Students. Journey: Journal of English Language and Pedagogy, Universitas Insan Budi Utomo, v. 5, n. 1, p. 80–90, 2022. DOI: 10.33503/journey.v5i1.524. Available from: https://ejurnal.uibu.ac.id/index.php/journey/article/view/524.
SETYANINGSIH, Endang et al. EFL Students’ Use, Perceptions, and Reliance on ChatGPT for Editing and Proofreading: A Technology Acceptance Model Perspective. Journal of Languages and Language Teaching, v. 13, n. 3, p. 1367–1386, July 2025. DOI: 10.33394/jollt.v13i3.15328.
SULISTIYO, Urip et al. Determinants of Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) Towards ICT Use for English Language Learning. In: PROCEEDINGS of the 68th TEFLIN International Conference. [S. l.: s. n.], 2022.
SUMAKUL, Dian Toar Y. G. The Interplay between L2 Motivation and Artificial Intelligence: What and How. CALL-EJ, v. 26, n. 3, p. 107–128, 2025.
TAFAZOLI, Dara. Exploring the Potential of Generative AI in Democratizing English Language Education. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, v. 7, p. 100275, 2024. DOI: 10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100275.
TEO, Timothy; TAN, Seng Chee; LEE, Chwee Beng; CHAI, Ching Sing; KOH, Joyce Hwee Ling; CHEN, Wenli. The Self-Directed Learning with Technology Scale (SDLTS) for Young Students: An Initial Development and Validation. Computers & Education, v. 55, n. 4, p. 1764–1771, 2010. DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.08.001.
VENKATESH, Viswanath; DAVIS, Fred D. A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies. Management Science, v. 46, n. 2, p. 186–204, Feb. 2000. DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926.
VY, Luu Thi Mai; VINH, Doan Quoc. ChatGPT’s Impact on Listening Comprehension: Perspectives from Vietnamese EFL University Learners. CALL-EJ, v. 26, n. 3, p. 43–63, 2025.
WANG, Chenghao; DU, Yiran; ZOU, Bin. Learners’ Acceptance and Use of Multimodal Artificial Intelligence (AI)-Generated Content in AI-Mediated Informal Digital Learning of English. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, n/a, n/a, July 2025. DOI: 10.1111/ijal.70040.
ZHAI, Chunpeng; WIBOWO, Santoso. A Systematic Review on Artificial Intelligence Dialogue Systems for Enhancing English as a Foreign Language Students’ Interactional Competence in the University. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, v. 4, p. 100134, 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100134.
ZHANG, Yuling; CAO, Jinping. Design of English Teaching System Using Artificial Intelligence. Computers and Electrical Engineering, v. 102, p. 108115, 2022. DOI: 10.1016/j.compeleceng.2022.108115.
Downloads
Publicado
Declaração de Disponibilidade de Dados
Research data is available in the body of the document.
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2026 Tubagus Zam Zam Al Arif, Kurniawan Dedy, Ervan Johan Wicaksana

Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Este é um artigo em acesso aberto que permite o uso irrestrito, a distribuição e reprodução em qualquer meio desde que o artigo original seja devidamente citado.








