Educação para os algoritmos

levantamento bibliográfico e debate sobre o conceito de literacia algorítmica

Autores

  • Willian Fernandes Araujo Universidade de Santa Cruz do Sul, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Educação, Departamento de Gestão de Negócios e Comunicação, Santa Cruz do Sul, RS, Brasil https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3271-6690
  • Fernanda Pires de Sá Universitat Autònoma de Barcelon, Departamento de Comunicación Audiovisual y Publicidad, Bellaterra, Barcelona, Espanha https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6172-7594

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-3652.2024.49440

Palavras-chave:

Dataficação, Plataformização, Sistemas algorítmicos, Educação

Resumo

O estudo tem como objetivo mapear o campo de investigação sobre literacia algorítmica nas línguas portuguesa, espanhola e inglesa. A crescente importância e presença dos algoritmos em diversas facetas da vida social motivou esta pesquisa. Para isso, foram utilizados quatro eixos de investigação: 1) definição de propostas conceptuais, 2) identificação de técnicas e estratégias pedagógicas emergentes nestes debates, 3) descrição das funções e domínios destas diferentes formas de conhecimento e 4) reflexão sobre os desafios e dificuldades revelados na literatura. A metodologia utilizada foi uma revisão sistemática da literatura nas bases de dados Scopus e Web of Science, utilizando os descritores ’Literacy AND Algorithmic’, ’algorithmic OR algorithm AND literacy OR literacies’. Posteriormente, 21 publicações foram analisadas após um fluxo sistemático de seleção. Inicialmente, a análise indica um aumento significativo de trabalhos nos últimos anos (2021 e 2022), a predominância de publicações em língua inglesa e a diversidade de publicações em diferentes domínios. A capacitação crítica, a consciencialização e a compreensão dos algoritmos surgem como temas-chave no debate, mas existe uma variação considerável nas abordagens pedagógicas adotadas para encorajar o envolvimento crítico com os sistemas algorítmicos.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Referências

ALEMAN, Ezequiel; NADOLNY, Larysa; FERREIRA, Alejandro; GABETTI, Bruno; ORTÍZ, Guillermo; ZANONIANI, Martín. Screening Bot: a Playground for Critical Algorithmic Literacy Engagement with Youth. In: ’21, Chi Play (ed.). Extended Abstracts of the 2021 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, out. 2021. p. 198–202. ISBN 9781450383561. DOI: 10.1145/3450337.3483478. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1145/3450337.3483478. Acesso em: 1 ago. 2024.

ASTAMBAYEVA, Z. et al. Algorithmic methodological and mathematical literacy of the future primary education teacher: Perspective of learning technology. World Journal on Educational Technology: Current Issues, v. 13, n. 4, p. 758–774, 2021. DOI: 10.18844/wjet.v13i4.6263. Disponível em: https://un-pub.eu/ojs/index.php/wjet/article/view/6263.

BAKKE, A. Everyday Googling: Results of an Observational Study and Applications for Teaching Algorithmic Literacy. Computers and Composition, v. 57, p. 102577, 2020. ISSN 8755-4615. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2020.102577. Disponível em: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S8755461520300384.

BELL, A. R. et al. Exploring the role of social media literacy in adolescents’ experiences with personalization: A Norwegian qualitative study. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, v. 66, n. 4, p. 239–248, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.1273. Disponível em: https://ila.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/jaal.1273.

BRUNO, F.; BENTES, A. C.; FALTAY, P. Economia psíquica dos algoritmos e laboratório de plataforma: mercado, ciência e modulação do comportamento. Revista FAMECOS (Online), v. 26, p. 33095–19357, 2019. DOI: 10.15448/1980-3729.2019.3.33095. Disponível em: https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/revistafamecos/article/view/33095.

BUCHER, Taina. The algorithmic imaginary: Exploring the ordinary affects of Facebook algorithms. In: THE Social Power of Algorithms. Londres: Routledge, 2017. p. 30–44. DOI: 10.1080/1369118x.2016.1154086. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1154086.

BUCKINGHAM, D. Manifesto pela Educação Midiática. São Paulo: Edições Sesc São Paulo, 2022. CECH, F. Beyond Transparency: Exploring Algorithmic Accountability. In: GROUP ’20: The 2020 ACM International Conference on Supporting Group Work, 2020, Sanibel Island Florida USA. Companion of the 2020 ACM International Conference on Supporting Group Work. Sanibel Island Florida USA: Acm, 2020. p. 11–14. ISBN 9781450367677. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3323994.3371015. Disponível em: https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3323994.3371015. Acesso em: 8 jan. 2024.

COTTER, Kelley; REISDORF, Bianca C. Algorithmic knowledge gaps: A new horizon of (digital) inequality. International Journal of Communication, v. 14, p. 21, 2020. Disponível em: https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/12450.

COULDRY, N.; MEJIAS, U. The costs of connection: how data is colonizing human life and appropriating it for capitalism. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2019.

DEVITO, M. A. Adaptive Folk Theorization as a Path to Algorithmic Literacy on Changing Platforms. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Acm, New York, v. 5, Cscw2, p. 1–38, 2021. DOI: 10.1145/3476080.

DOGRUEL, Leyla. What is algorithm literacy? A conceptualization and challenges regarding its empirical measurement. Edição: Monika Taddicken e Christina Schumann. 75898, Berlin, v. 9, p. 67–93, 2021. ISSN 2198-7610. DOI: https://doi.org/10.48541/dcr.v9.3.

DOGRUEL, Leyla; MASUR, Philipp; JOECKEL, Sven. Development and validation of an algorithm literacy scale for internet users. Communication Methods and Measures, Routledge, Londres, v. 16, n. 2, p. 115–133, 2022. DOI: 10.1080/19312458.2021.1968361. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2021.1968361.

ESLAMI, M. et al. I always assumed that i wasn’t really that close to [her]: reasoning about invisible algorithms in news feeds. In: (Chi ’15), p. 153–162. ISBN 9781450331456. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702556.

FLETCHER, Amelia. International pro-competition regulation of digital platforms: healthy experimentation or dangerous fragmentation? Oxford Review of Economic Policy, v. 39, n. 1, p. 12–33, 2023. ISSN 0266-903x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/grac047. eprint: https://academic.oup.com/oxrep/article-pdf/39/1/12/49590354/grac047.pdf.

GARCÍA-PEÑALVO, Francisco José. Developing robust state-of-the-art reports: Systematic Literature Reviews. Education in the Knowledge Society, v. 23, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14201/eks.28600. Disponível em: https://revistas.usal.es/tres/index.php/eks/article/view/28600.

GROHMANN, Rafael. Not just platform, nor cooperatives: Worker-owned technologies from below. Communication, Culture & Critique, v. 16, n. 4, p. 274–282, 2023.

GROSMAN, Jérémy; JACQUES, Jerry; COLLARD, Anne-Sophie. ”The Beatles with the Lower Score, it Breaks my Heart”: Framing a Media Education Response to Datafication and Algorithmic Recommendations in Digital Media Infrastructures. In: PANGRAZIO, Luci; SEFTON-GREEN, Julian (ed.). Learning to Live with Datafication.: Educational Case Studies and Initiatives from Across the World. [S. l.]: Routledge, 2022. p. 135–152.

HARGITTAI, Eszter et al. Black box measures? How to study people’s algorithm skills. Information, Communication & Society, Routledge, Londres, v. 23, n. 5, p. 764–775, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2020.1713846.

HOW, M.-L. Advancing Multidisciplinary STEM Education with Mathematics for Future-Ready Quantum Algorithmic Literacy. Mathematics, v. 10, n. 7, p. 1146, 2022. ISSN 2227-7390. DOI: 10.3390/math10071146. Disponível em: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/10/7/1146.

JEONG, H.-S.; OH, Y. J.; KIM, A. Critical algorithm literacy education in the age of digital platforms. In: PANGRAZIO, L.; SEFTON-GREEN, J. (ed.). Learning to Live with Datafication. 1. ed. Londres: Routledge, 2022. p. 153–168. Disponível em: https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781003136842/chapters/10.4324/9781003136842-9. Acesso em: 8 jan. 2024.

KAMPA, P.; BALZER, F. Algorithmic literacy in medical students – results of a knowledge test conducted in Germany. Health Information & Libraries Journal, v. 38, n. 3, p. 224–230, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/hir.12392. Disponível em: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/hir.12392.

KAPSCH, P. H. Exploring user agency and small acts of algorithm engagement in everyday media use. Media International Australia, v. 183, n. 1, p. 16–29, 2022. DOI: 10.1177/1329878x211067803. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1177/1329878X211067803.

KLUMBBYTE, G.; LÜCKING, P.; DRAUDE, C. Reframing AX with Critical Design: The Potentials and Limits of Algorithmic Experience as a Critical Design Concept. In: ’20, Nordichi (ed.). NORDICHI ’20: Shaping Experiences, Shaping Society, 2020, Tallinn Estonia. Proceedings of the 11th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Shaping Experiences, Shaping Society. Tallinn Estonia: Acm, 2020. p. 1–12. ISBN 9781450375795. DOI: 10.1145/3419249.3420120. Disponível em: https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3419249.3420120. Acesso em: 8 jan. 2024.

KOENIG, A. The Algorithms Know Me and I Know Them: Using Student Journals to Uncover Algorithmic Literacy Awareness. Computers and Composition, v. 58, p. 102611, 2020.

KÖNIG, P. D. Challenges in enabling user control over algorithm-based services. Computers and Composition, v. 58, p. 102611, 2020. ISSN 8755-4615. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2020.102611. Disponível em: https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00146-022-01395-1. Acesso em: 8 jan. 2024.

LLOYD, A. Chasing Frankenstein’s monster: information literacy in the black box society. Journal of Documentation, v. 75, n. 6, p. 1475–1485, 2019.

LV, X.; CHEN, Y.; GUO, W. Adolescents’ Algorithmic Resistance to Short Video APP’s Recommendation: The Dual Mediating Role of Resistance Willingness and Resistance Intention. Frontiers in Psychology, v. 13, p. 859597, 2022. ISSN 1664-1078. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.859597. Disponível em: https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.859597.

MAGALHÃES, João Carlos. Do algorithms shape character? Considering algorithmic ethical subjectivation. Social Media+ Society, v. 4, n. 2, p. 2056305118768301, 2018. DOI: 10.1177/2056305118768301. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305118768301.

MBEMBE, Achille. Futures of Life and Futures of Reason. Public Cultures, v. 33, n. 1, p. 11–33, jan. 2021. ISSN 0899-2363. DOI: 10.1215/08992363-8742136. eprint: https://read.dukeupress.edu/public-culture/article-pdf/33/1(93)/11/927025/11mbembe.pdf.

MOHER, David et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (Chinese edition). Journal of Chinese Integrative Medicine, v. 7, n. 9, p. 889–896, 2009. DOI: 10.3736/jcim20090918. Disponível em: http://www.jcimjournal.com/EN/abstract/article_1309.shtml.

MORA, Raúl Alberto. Translating literacy as global policy and advocacy. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, v. 59, n. 6, p. 647–651, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.515. Disponível em: https://ila.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/jaal.515.

ORGANIZAÇÃO DAS NAÇÕES UNIDAS (ONU). Informe de Política para a Nossa Agenda Comum: Integridade da Informação nas Plataformas Digitais, 2023. Disponível em: https://brasil.un.org/sites/default/files/2023-10/ONU_Integridade_Informacao_Plataformas_Digitais_Informe-Secretario-Geral_2023.pdf. Acesso em: 13 nov. 2023.

PANGRAZIO, L.; SEFTON-GREEN, J. (ed.). Learning to live with datafication: Educational case studies and initiatives from across the world. Londres: Routledge, 2022.

PARNELL, S. I.; KLEIN, S. H.; GAISER, F. Do we know and do we care? Algorithms and Attitude towards Conversational User Interfaces: Comparing Chatbots and Voice Assistants. In: 2022, Cui (ed.). CUI 2022: 4th Conference on Conversational User Interfaces, 2022, Glasgow United Kingdom. Proceedings of the 4th Conference on Conversational User Interfaces. Glasgow, United Kingdom: Acm, 2022. p. 1–6. ISBN 9781450397391. DOI: 10.1145/3543829.3544517. Disponível em: https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3543829.3544517. Acesso em: 8 jan. 2024.

RIDLEY, M.; PAWLICK-POTTS, D. Algorithmic Literacy and the Role for Libraries. Information Technology and Libraries, v. 40, n. 2, 2021. DOI: 10.6017/ital.v40i2.12963. Disponível em: https://ital.corejournals.org/index.php/ital/article/view/12963. Acesso em: 8 jan. 2024.

RIEDER, Bernhard. Examinando uma técnica algorítmica: o classificador de bayes como uma leitura interessada da realidade. Parágrafo, v. 6, n. 1, p. 123–142, 2018.

ROGERS, Richard. The Propagation of Misinformation in Social Media: A Cross-platform Analysis. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 2023. ISBN 9789463720762. Disponível em: http://www.jstor.org/stable/jj.1231864.

ROSA, Beatrice Bonami. A transdisciplinariedade das literacias emergentes no contemporâneo conectado: um mapeamento do universo documental das literacias de mídia e informação (MIL). 2016. Mestrado em Interfaces Sociais da Comunicação – Escola de Comunicações e Artes, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo. DOI: 10.11606/D.27.2017.tde-09032017-143021. Acesso em: 3 jun. 2024.

SEAVER, Nick. Algorithms as culture: Some tactics for the ethnography of algorithmic systems. Big data & society, v. 4, n. 2, p. 2053951717738104, 2017. DOI: 10.1177/2053951717738104. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951717738104.

SHIN, D. How do people judge the credibility of algorithmic sources? AI & Society, v. 37, n. 1, p. 81–96, 2022. DOI: 10.1007/s00146-021-01158-4.

SILES, Ignacio. Vivir con algoritmos: plataformas digitales y cultura en Costa Rica. Costa Rica: Cicom, 2023.

SILVA, D. E.; CHEN, C.; ZHU, Y. Facets of algorithmic literacy: Information, experience, and individual factors predict attitudes toward algorithmic systems. New Media & Society, v. 26, n. 5, p. 2992–3017, 2022. DOI: 10.1177/14614448221098042. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448221098042.

SUED, G. E. Entrenar al algoritmo: gobernanza, agencia y literacidad en el uso de YouTube. Contratexto, Scielo, Lima, n. 037, p. 159–182, 2022. ISSN 1025-9945. Disponível em: http://www.scielo.org.pe/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1025-99452022000100159&nrm=iso.

VAN ES, Karin; SCHÄFER, Mirko Tobias. The datafied society: Studying culture through data. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 2017. ISBN 9789462981362. Disponível em: http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt1v2xsqn.

WHITE, Adrian; SCHMIDT, Katja. Systematic literature reviews. Complementary therapies in medicine, v. 13, n. 1, p. 54–60, 2005. ISSN 0965-2299. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctim.2004.12.003. Disponível em: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S096522990500004X.

ZUBOFF, S. A era do capitalismo de vigilância: A luta por um futuro humano na nova fronteira do poder. Rio de Janeiro: Editora Intrínseca, 2020

Publicado

05-08-2024

Como Citar

ARAUJO, W. F.; SÁ, F. P. de. Educação para os algoritmos: levantamento bibliográfico e debate sobre o conceito de literacia algorítmica. Texto Livre, Belo Horizonte-MG, v. 17, p. e49440, 2024. DOI: 10.1590/1983-3652.2024.49440. Disponível em: https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/textolivre/article/view/49440. Acesso em: 21 nov. 2024.