Impact Analysis of Qualified Scientific Publications in the Area of Agricultural Sciences I of Capes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35699/2447-6218.2019.15883Keywords:
Metrics, Correlation, Qualis, IndicatorsAbstract
In Brazil, some of the indices used to evaluate the diffusion of science are: the Qualis index, the normalized h index, g index and h index, in addition to the impact factor and its proprietary version the JCR. This article aims to evaluate the impact and quality of journals in the area of Agrarian Sciences I of the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES), from 2010 to 2016. This evaluation was based on several biases, that for some, all 3975 magazines could be analyzed (census) and for others, a sample of 748 magazines. Qualis, citations per article, number of articles published, number of authors per article, g index, h index, individual normalized h index (hinorm), number of citations, number of articles, impact factor (FI) and JCR (Journal Citation Reports) were evaluated. Qualis data were obtained from Capes Sucupira platform, while the other variables were collected using Harzing’s Publish or Perish software. Statistical treatment and data tabulation were performed using R statistical software and Excel software, respectively. The results indicate that there is a positive correlation between all the above mentioned impact metrics and a low Qualis correlation with the other evaluation metrics of scientific production.
References
Barata, R. C. B. 2016. Dez coisas que você deveria saber sobre o Qualis. Revista Brasileira de Pós-graduação, 13: 13-40. DOI: 10.21713/2358-2332.2016.v13.947.
Drapper, N. R; Smith, H. 1981. Applied Regression Analysis. 2. ed. New York. John Wiley & Sons.
Egghe, L. 2006. Theory and practise of the g-index. Scientometrics, 69: 131–152. Disponível em: https://bit.ly/2oJxlWo.
Federizzi, L. C; Vitorino, A. C. T; Lopes, S; Lopes, M. T. G; Chagas, E. A. 2016. Critérios de classificação Qualis: Ciências Agrárias I. Disponível em: https://goo.gl/C9s6S3.
Ferreira, A. G. C.. 2010. Bibliometria na avaliação de periódicos científicos. Revista em Ciência da Informação, 11. Disponível em: https://bit.ly/2lwx7Qq.
Harzing, A.W. Publish or Perish. 2007. Disponível em: http://www.harzing.com/pop.html.
Harzing, A.W; Alakangas, S.; Adams, D. 2014. HIa: An individual anual h-index to accommodate disciplinary and career length differences, Scientometrics, 99: 811-821. DOI: 1007/s11192-013-1208-0.
Hirsch, J. E. 2005. An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (PNAS), 102:16569-16572. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0507655102
Hayashi, M.C.P. 2012. Sociologia da ciência, bibliometria e cientometria: contribuições para a análise da produção científica. Anais do Seminário de Epistemologia e Teorias de Educação (EPISTED), Campinas, SP, Brasil, 4. Dísponível em: https://bit.ly/2lAiBqM.
Oliveira, A. B.; Rodrigues, R. S.; Blattmann, U.; Pinto, A. L. 2015. Comparação entre o qualis/capes e os índices h e g: o caso do portal de periódicos UFSC. Informação e Informação, 20: 70-91. DOI: https://bit.ly/2lzRdJO.
Packer, A. 2010. Os Periódicos Brasileiros e a Comunicação da Pesquisa Nacional. Revista USP, 20: 26-61. Disponível em: https://bit.ly/2lPZRDQ.
Pinto, A. C. ; Andrade, J. D. 1999. Fator de Impacto de Revistas Científicas: qual o Significado deste Parâmetro? Química Nova, 22: 448-453. DOI: https://bit.ly/2xqqXoT.
Siegel, S.; Castellan Junior, N. J. 2006. Estatística não paramétrica para as ciências do comportamento. p. 266-276 . In: Métodos de associação e seus testes de significância. Bookman, São Paulo. Artmed.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
The Copyright for articles published in this journal follow authorship. The articles are open access, with their own attributions, in educational and non-commercial applications.
The journal reserves the right to make regulatory, orthographic and grammatical changes in the originals, with the aim of maintaining the standard language and the credibility of the vehicle. It will respect, however, the writing style of the authors.
Changes, corrections or suggestions of conceptual order will be forwarded to the authors, when necessary. In such cases, the articles, once appropriate, should be submitted for further consideration.
The opinions issued by the authors of the articles are their sole responsibility.
Agrarian Science Journal is licensed under a 