Metacognitive Skills in Assessment Tasks to Create Infographics in Initial Teacher Training
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.28976/1984-2686rbpec2022u12951320Keywords:
Graphic Organizers, Teacher Training, MetacognitionAbstract
Numerous studies have shown how important it is to employ instructional techniques that make it easier for students to acquire what are known as metacognitive abilities. In this sense, it is crucial to address this subject in teacher preparation programs, offering students a good opportunity to practice and absorb strategies of this nature. In order to build metacognitive abilities and understand pedagogical concepts in a teacher training course, this study presents and analyzes the findings of a didactic inquiry into the potential pedagogical advantages of employing graphical writing activities. A didactic intervention including the creation and presentation of infographics regarding several pedagogical ideas was conducted with a class of 35 students in the first training program for elementary school teachers. Data were gathered through participant observation. Infographics composition tasks seem to stimulate the use of various metacognitive skills and provide favorable conditions for acquisition, insofar as they give students the chance to perceive difficulties, explore different strategies to overcome them, improve prior knowledge, gain a better understanding of the topic in question, and let their creativity run free.
Downloads
References
Alves, G., & Aguiar, M. (2017). Modelo esquemático para classificação e categorização sintática da infografia impressa. InfoDesign - Revista Brasileira de Design da Informação, 14(2), 273–284. https://doi.org/10.51358/id.v14i2.607
André, M. (1995). Etnografia da prática escolar. Papirus.
Baker, L. & Brown, A. (1984). Metacognitive skills and reading. In P. Pearson, R. Barr, M. Kamil & P. Mosenthal (Eds.), Handbook of Reading Research (pp. 353–394). Longman.
Bardin, L. (1977). Análise de conteúdo. Edições 70.
Brabo, J. C. (2018). Metacognição, ensino-aprendizagem e formação de professores de ciências. Amazônia: Revista de Educação em Ciências e Matemáticas, 14(29), 1–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.18542/amazrecm.v14i29.5898
Boruchovitch, E. (1999). Estratégias de aprendizagem e desempenho escolar: considerações para a prática educacional. Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica, 12(2), 361–376. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-79721999000200008
Oliveira, L, Boruchovitch, E. & Santos, A. (2009). Estratégias de aprendizagem e desempenho acadêmico: evidências de validade. Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa, 25(4), 531–536. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-37722009000400008
Braund, H. (2019). Supporting Metacognitive Development in Science Education: Exploring Ontario Elementary Teachers’ Beliefs and Practices in Metacognition. Alberta Science Education Journal, 46(1), 10–21.
Brown, A. (1978). Knowing when, where, and how to remember: A problem of metacognition. In R. Glaser (Org.), Advances in instructional psychology (pp. 77–165). Erlbaum.
Bulegon, A. M., Drescher, C. F., & Santos, L. (03–06 de Junho, 2017). Infográficos: possibilidade de atividades de ensino para aulas de Física e Química. XI Encontro Nacional de Pesquisa em Educação em Ciências (ENPEC), Florianópolis, Santa Catarina.
Calegari, D., & Perfeito, A. (2013). Infográfico: possibilidades metodológicas em salas de aula de Ensino Médio. Entretextos, 13(1), 291–307. https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/entretextos/article/view/15170
Contente, I. C. R. P, & Brabo, J. C. (2020). Aprender a aprender: atividades que estimulam o uso de habilidades metacognitivas para a aprendizagem. Educapes. http://educapes.capes.gov.br/handle/capes/584034
Corso, H., Sperb, T., & Salles, J. (2013). Comparação entre maus compreendedores e bons leitores em tarefas neuropsicológicas. Psicologia em Pesquisa, 7(1), 37–49.
Costa, V. M., & Tarouco, L. M. (2010). Infográfico: características, autoria e uso educacional. Revista Novas Tecnologias na Educação, 8(3), 1–13. https://www.lume.ufrgs.br/handle/10183/225610
Darroz, L. M., Trevisan, T. L., & Rosa, C. T. W. (2018) Estratégias de aprendizagem: caminhos para o sucesso escolar. Amazônia — Revista de Educação em Ciências e Matemáticas, 14(29), 93–109. http://dx.doi.org/10.18542/amazrecm.v14i29.5473
Erickson, F. (1986). Qualitative methods in research on teaching. In M. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 119–141). Macmillan.
Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive–developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906–911. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.906
Freeman, L. M., Locke, J., Rotheram-Fuller, E., & Mandell, D. (2017). Brief report: Examining executive and social functioning in elementary-aged children with autism. Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 47(6), 1890–1895. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-017-3079-3
Hawk, P. (1986). Using graphic organizers to increase achievement in middle school life science. Science Education, 70(1), 81–87. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730700110
Kolić-Vehovec, S., & Bajsanski, I. (2007). Comprehension monitoring and reading comprehension in bilingual students. Journal of Research in Reading, 30(2), 198–211. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2006.00319.x
Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy: an overview. Theory into practice, 41(4), 212–218. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4104_2
Locatelli, S. W. (2014). Tópicos de metacognição: para aprender e ensinar melhor. Appris.
Locatelli, S. W. (2017). A percepção de graduandos acerca de um processo avaliativo em práticas de ensino de Química - é possível avaliar de forma diferente? Revista Docência do Ensino Superior, 7(2), 13–33. https://doi.org/10.35699/2237-5864.2017.2241
Locatelli, S. W., & Alves, N. C. (2018). Aproximações entre o monitoramento metacognitivo e a elaboração de portfólio em uma disciplina de Química Geral. Amazônia — Revista de Educação em Ciências e Matemáticas, 14(29), 79–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.18542/amazrecm.v14i29.5578
Luna, T. S., & Marcuschi, B. (2015). Letramentos literários: o que se avalia no exame nacional do ensino médio? Educação em Revista, 31(3), 195–224. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-4698135569
Neuenhaus, N., Artelt, C., Lingel, K., & Schneider, W. (2011). Fifth graders metacognitive knowledge: general or domain-specific? European Journal of Psychology of Education, 26(2), 163–178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-010-0040-7
Novak, J. D. (1990). Concept maps and Vee diagrams: Two metacognitive tools to facilitate meaningful learning. Instructional Science, 19(1), 29–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00377984
Pintrich, P. R. (2002). The role of metacognitive knowledge in learning, teaching, and assessing. Theory into practice, 41(4), 219–225. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4104_3
Rosa, C. T. W. (2011). A metacognição e as atividades experimentais no ensino de Física (Tese de Doutorado, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Santa Catarina). Repositório Institucional da UFSC. http://repositorio.ufsc.br/xmlui/handle/123456789/95261
Rosa, C. T. W., & Alves Filho, J. P. (2014). Estudo da viabilidade de uma proposta didática metacognitiva para as atividades experimentais em Física. Ciência & Educação, 20(1), 61–81. https://doi.org/10.1590/1516-731320140010005
Rosa, C. T. W., & Villagrá, J. M. (2018). Metacognição e Ensino de Física: revisão de pesquisas associadas a intervenções didáticas. Revista Brasileira de Pesquisa em Educação em Ciências, 18(2), 581–608. https://doi.org/10.28976/1984-2686rbpec2018182581
Schoonen, R., Hulstijn, J., & Bossers, B. (1998). Metacognitive and language‐specific knowledge in native and foreign language reading comprehension: An empirical study among Dutch students in grades 6, 8 and 10. Language Learning, 48(1), 71–106. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9922.00033
Schraw, G., & Dennison, R. S. (1994). Assessing metacognitive awareness. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19(4), 460–475. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1994.1033
Soodla, P., Jõgi, A. L., & Kikas, E. (2017). Relationships between teachers’ metacognitive knowledge and students’ metacognitive knowledge and reading achievement. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 32(2), 201–218. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-016-0293-x
Souza, R. A. A. (2009). Visualização da Informação quantitativa em jornalismo televisivo: Classificação de infográficos em vídeo (Dissertação de Mestrado, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro). Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações — UERJ. http://www.bdtd.uerj.br/handle/1/9157
Temur, Ö. D., Özsoy, G., & Turgut, S. (2019). Metacognitive instructional behaviours of preschool teachers in mathematical activities. ZDM, 51(4), 655–666. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-019-01069-1
Thomas, G. P. (2013). Changing the metacognitive orientation of a classroom environment to stimulate metacognitive reflection regarding the nature of physics learning. International Journal of Science Education, 35(7), 1183–1207. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2013.778438
Unesco (2020). El enfoque de Aprendizaje a lo Largo de Toda la Vida Implicaciones para la política educativa en América Latina y el Caribe. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000373632_spa
Van Gelderen, A., Schoonen, R., Stoel, R. D., De Glopper, K., & Hulstijn, J. (2007). Development of adolescent reading comprehension in language 1 and language 2: a longitudinal analysis of constituent components. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(3), 477–491. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.99.3.477
Van Kraayenoord, C. E., Beinicke, A., Schlagmuller, M., & Schneider, W. (2012). Word identification, metacognitive knowledge, motivation and reading comprehension: An Australian study of grade 3 and 4 pupils. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 35(1), 51–68. https://search.informit.org/doi/10.3316/ielapa.899446083534055
Varela, B. (2013). Evolução dos paradigmas educacionais e ‘novas’ tendências nas abordagens pedagógico-didáticas. Portal do Conhecimento de Cabo Verde. https://bit.ly/3N687I6
Veenman, M. V., Hout-Wolters, V., Bernadette, H. A. M., & Afflerbach, P. (2006). Metacognition and learning: Conceptual and methodological considerations. Metacognition and Learning, 1(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-006-6893-0
Wall, K., & Hall, E. (2016). Teachers as metacognitive role models. European Journal of Teacher Education, 39(4), 403–418. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2016.1212834
Winne, P. H. (1996). A metacognitive view of individual differences in self-regulated learning. Learning and individual differences, 8(4), 327–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1041-6080(96)90022-9
Zimmerman, B. J. (1995). Self-regulation involves more than metacognition: A social cognitive perspective. Educational Psychologist, 30(4), 217–221. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3004_8
Zohar, A. (1999). Teachers’ metacognitive knowledge and the instruction of higher order thinking. Teaching and Teacher Education, 15(4), 413–429. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(98)00063-8
Zohar, A., & Barzilai, S. (2013). A review of research on metacognition in science education: Current and future directions. Studies in Science Education, 49(2), 121–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2013.847261
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Jesus Cardoso Brabo, Isabela Cristina Ribeiro Portugal Contente
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The authors are responsible for the veracity of the information provided and for the content of the papers.
The authors who publish in this journal fully agree with the following terms:
- The authors attest that the work is unpublished, that is, it has not been published in another journal, event notices or equivalent.
- The authors attest that they did not submit the paper to another journal simultaneously.
- The authors retain the copyright and grant to RPBEC the right of first publication, with the work licensed simultaneously under a Creative Commons Attribution License, which allows the sharing of the work with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- The authors attest that they own the copyright or the written permission from copyright owners of figures, tables, large texts, etc. that are included in the paper.
- Authors are authorized to take additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (for example, to publish in institutional repository or as a book chapter), with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) after the publication in order to increase the impact and citation of published work.
In case of identification of plagiarism, inappropriate republishing and simultaneous submissions, the authors authorize the Editorial Board to make public what happened, informing the editors of the journals involved, any plagiarized authors and their institutions of origin.
