Embracement analysis of the risk classification in the emergency units
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5935/1415-2762.20190058Keywords:
User Embracement, Emergencies, Nursing Care, Emergency NursingAbstract
Objective: to evaluate the embracement services in the risk classification performed in emergency units. Method: this is a cross-sectional and quantitative study, carried out with 63 nurses who work in the emergency units of João Pessoa, Paraíba, Brazil. Data were collected through individual interviews conducted in the nurses' work environment, using a semi-structured questionnaire and the embracement of the risk classification analysis instrument, analyzed using descriptive statistics. Results: by assessing the dimensions of embracement of the risk classification instrument, it was observed that most nurses
classified the “structure” as precarious (47.6%), the “process” as satisfactory (47.6%) and the “result” as equally satisfactory and precarious (42.9%). The individual analysis of each service showed that only one emergency unit classified the “structure” as precarious, and the other questions were considered satisfactory in the other Donabedian dimensions: process and result. Conclusion: embracement in the risk classification has fulfilled one of its main objectives, assisting the patient according to the severity of the case and not
of his arrival order.
Downloads
References
1. Ministério da Saúde (BR). Portaria Nº 10 de 3 de janeiro de 2017. Redefine as diretrizes de modelo assistencial e financiamento de UPA 24h de Pronto Atendimento como Componente da Rede de Atenção às Urgências, no âmbito do Sistema Único de Saúde. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde; 2017[citado em 2018 jul. 15]. Disponível em: http://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/saudelegis/gm/2017/prt0010_03_01_2017.html
2. Amthauer C, Cunha MLC. Manchester Triage System: main flowcharts, discriminators and outcomes of a pediatric emergency care. Rev Latino-Am Enferm. 2016[citado em 2018 jul. 15];24:e2779. Disponível em: http://www.scielo.br/pdf/rlae/v24/0104-1169-rlae-24-02779.pdf
3. Ministério da Saúde (BR). Política Nacional de Humanização - PNH. 2015[citado em 2018 jul. 15]. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde; 2015. Disponível em: http://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/folder/politica_nacional_humanizacao_pnh_1ed.pdf
4. Marculino LMG, Noronha MRG, Monteiro MGS, Abreu RNDC, Silva FC, Carvalho ZMF. Nursing knowledge and practices about the Manchester Risk Rating System. J Nurs UFPE on line. 2015[citado em 2018 jul. 15];9(10):9462-8. Disponível em: https://periodicos.ufpe.br/revistas/revistaenfermagem/article/view/10888/12140
5. Bellucci Júnior JA, Vituri DW, Versa GLGS, Furuya OS, Vidor RC, Matsuda LM. Hospital emergency service patient reception with triage: evaluation of the care process. Rev Enferm UERJ. 2015[citado em 2018 jul. 15];23(2):82-7. Disponível em: https://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/index.php/enfermagemuerj/article/view/4976/12347
6. Feijó VBER, Cordoni Junior L, Souza RKT, Dias AO. Análise da demanda atendida em unidade de urgência com classificação de risco. Saúde Debate. 2015[citado em 2018 jul. 15];39(106):627-36. Disponível em: http://www.scielo.br/pdf/sdeb/v39n106/0103-1104-sdeb-39-106-00627.pdf
7. Soares A, Nascimento TLRG, Pereira TLB, Soares AS, Rodrigues ACM, Dantas NR, et al. Evaluation of a risk rating instrumento in the reception a hospital unit a South Central Ceará. Int Arch Med. 2016[citado em 2018 jul. 15];9(3):1-7. Disponível em: https://imed.pub/ojs/index.php/iam/article/view/1436/1113
8. Bellucci Júnior JA, Matsuda LM. Construção e validação de instrumento para avaliação do Acolhimento com Classificação de Risco. Rev Bras Enferm. 2012[citado em 2018 jul. 15];65(5):751-7. Disponível em: http://www.scielo.br/pdf/reben/v65n5/06.pdf
9. Brook RH, Lohr KN. The Definition of Quality and Approaches to Its Assessment. Health Serv Res. 1981[citado em 2018 jul. 15];16(2):236-7. Disponível em: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1072233/
10. Inoue KC, Murassaki ACY, Bellucci Júnior JA, Rossi RM, Martinez YDE, Matsuda LM. User embracement with risk rating: evaluation of the structure, process, and result. REME - Rev Min Enferm. 2015[citado em 2018 jan. 12];19(1):21-8. Disponível em: http://www.reme.org.br/artigo/detalhes/982
11. Bampi R, Lorenzini E, Krauzer IM, Ferraz L, Silva EF, Dall'Agnol CM. Perspectives of the nursing team on patient safety in an emergency unit. J Nurs UFPE on line. 2017[citado em 2018 jan. 12];11(2):584-90. Disponível em: https://periodicos.ufpe.br/revistas/revistaenfermagem/article/view/11977/14529
12. Roncalli AA, Oliveira DN, Melo IC, Viegas SMF, Brito RF. Everyday experiences of the nurse in risk classification in an emergency unit. J Nurs UFPE on line. 2017[citado em 2018 ago. 12];11(4):1743-51. Disponível em: https://periodicos.ufpe.br/revistas/revistaenfermagem/article/viewFile/15246/18029
13. Versa GLGS, Vituri DW, Buriola AA, Oliveira CA, Matsua LM. Assessment of user embracement with risk rating in emergency hospital services. Rev Gaúcha Enferm. 2014[citado em 2018 jan. 12];35(3):21-8. Disponível em: http://www.scielo.br/pdf/rgenf/v35n3/1983-1447-rgenf-35-03-00021.pdf
14. Costa MAR, Versa GLGS, Bellucci JÁ, Inoue KC, Sales CA, Matsuda. Admittance of Risk-Classified Cases: assessment of hospital emergency services. Esc Anna Nery Rev Enferm. 2015[citado em 2018 jan. 12];19(3):491-7. Disponível em: http://www.scielo.br/pdf/ean/v19n3/en_1414-8145-ean-19-03-0491.pdf
15. Silva PL, Faria VB, Ohl RIB, Chavaglia SRR. Triage in an adult emergency servisse: patient satisfaction. Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2016[citado em 2017 fev. 22];50(3):427-32. Disponível em: http://www.scielo.br/pdf/reeusp/v50n3/0080-6234-reeusp-50-03-0427.pdf
16. Silva MFN, Oliveira GN, Pergola-Marconato AM, Marconato RS, Bargas EB, Araújo IEM. Assessment and risk classification protocol for patients in emergency units. Rev Latino-Am Enferm. 2014[citado em 2018 fev. 08];22(2):218-25. Disponível em: http://www.scielo.br/pdf/rlae/v22n2/0104-1169-rlae-22-02-00218.pdf
17. Uchimura LYT, Viana ALA, Silva HP, Ibañez. Unidades de Pronto Atendimento (UPAs): características da gestão às redes de atenção no Paraná. Saúde Debate. 2015[citado 2018 em fev. 20];39(107):972-83. Disponível em: http://www.scielo.br/pdf/sdeb/v39n107/0103-1104-sdeb-39-107-00972.pdf
18. Shen Y, Lee LH. Improving the wait time to consultation at the emergency department. BMJ Opne Qual. 2018[citado em 2018 fev. 18];7(1):e000131. Disponível em: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5759711/
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2019 Reme: Revista Mineira de Enfermagem
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Links
Facebook
Instagram
Twitter
