STRATEGIC PLANNING IN HEALTH IN BRAZIL

rise and decline

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35699/2316-9389.2024.49473

Keywords:

Health Planning, Strategic Health Planning, Health Policy, Health Systems Administration, Institutional Analysis, Participatory Governance in Health

Abstract

This study adopts a reflective approach, revisiting the conceptual foundations and historical milestones of health planning in Brazil, with particular attention to its emergence, prominence, and subsequent decline. Health planning in Latin America initially drew upon economic rationality, taking inspiration from the CENDES/PAHO methodology to enhance system performance and efficiency. In Brazil, during the 1960s, normative planning—characterized by centralized programming—was employed to address priority health issues. In response to the political authoritarianism of the military dictatorship and a deepening economic crisis, Strategic Planning (SP) emerged as a critical alternative to normative approaches. It aimed to foster democratic and participatory institutional planning processes. Notably, Mario Testa conceptualized SP as a transformative tool, integral to the historical construction of a more equitable society. Carlos Matus contributed to this framework by emphasizing situational analysis as a key mechanism for enhancing governability and strengthening governmental responsiveness and capacity. Institutional analysis further enriched the planning landscape by advocating for innovative institutional arrangements that expanded dialogue and fostered shared responsibility among stakeholders in efforts to democratize organizational structures. Between the 1980s and early 2000s, SP methodologies were widely integrated into undergraduate and postgraduate education, as well as professional training programs. These approaches played a significant role in the implementation of Brazil’s Unified Health System (SUS), contributing to the development of more participatory and democratic governance in health. Over time, however, SP tools and methodologies were increasingly supplanted by managerialist practices focused on performance metrics, leading to a gradual disengagement from contextual and policy-based analysis. This shift marks the decline of Strategic Planning in Brazil, a trend observable in the academic sphere through a notable decrease in related publications, research, and teaching activities.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Deborah Carvalho Malta, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais - UFMG, Escola de Enfermagem - EE, Departamento de Enfermagem Materno-Infantil e Saúde Pública. Belo Horizonte, MG - Brasil.

     

     

  • Fausto Pereira dos Santos, Instituto René Rachou. Fiocruz. Belo Horizonte, MG - Brasil.

    Doctor,  with Medical Residency in Preventive and Social Medicine, he holds a PhD in Public Health, area of concentration in Health Planning and Administration, from the State University of Campinas (2006). Former CEO of the National Supplementary Health Agency for two terms, former deputy municipal secretary of health of Belo Horizonte, former Executive Secretary and Health Care of the Ministry of Health. Former State Secretary of Health of Minas Gerais. He currently holds the position of Specialist in Public Policies and Government Management (EPPGG) of the Ministry of Management and Innovation, and is working at Fiocruz Minas, René Rachou Institute. Professor of the Graduate Program of the Faculty of Medical Sciences of the Lucas Machado Educational Foundation.He has experience in the area of Collective Health, with an emphasis on management, working mainly on the following topics: health policy, public regulation, supplementary health, health plans, health insurance and Healthcare system.

References

1. Romo CM. Adeus senhor presidente: governantes e governados. São Paulo: Edições FUNDAP; 1997.

2. Merhy EE. Planejamento como tecnologia de gestão: tendências e debates no planejamento em saúde no Brasil. In: Gallo E. Razão e planejamento: reflexões sobre política estratégia e liberdade. São Paulo: Hucitec; Rio de Janeiro: Abrasco; 1995.

3. Furtado JP, Campos GWS, Oda WY, Onocko-Campos R. Planejamento e avaliação em saúde: entre antagonismo e colaboração. Cad Saúde Pública [Internet]. 2018[citado em 2024 jan. 08];34(7): e00087917. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311X00087917

4. Fekete MC. Planejamento e programação em saúde: bases conceituais e metodológicas do planejamento em saúde. In: Ministério da Saúde (BR). Gestão municipal de saúde. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde; 2001. p. 201-17.

5. Gentilini JA. Atores, cenários e planos: o planejamento estratégico situacional e a educação. Cad Pesqui [Internet]. 2014[citado em 2024 jan. 08];44(153):580-601. Disponível em:

https://doi.org/10.1590/198053142954

6. Rivera FJU. Planejamento e programação em saúde: um enfoque estratégico. São Paulo: Cortez; 1989.

7. Giovanella L. Planejamento estratégico em saúde: uma discussão da abordagem de Mário Testa. Cad Saúde Pública [Internet].1990 [citado em 2024 jan. 08];6(2):129-53. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-311X1990000200003

8. Merhy EE. Saúde: a cartografia do trabalho vivo. São Paulo: Hucitec; 2007.

9. Testa M. Estrategia, coherencia y poder en las propuestas de salud. Cuad Med Soc (Ros.) [Internet].1987[citado em 2024 jan. 08];38(4 Pt 1):24. Disponível em: https://web.amr.org.ar/cuadernos-medicos-sociales/

10. Mattos RA. (Re)visitando alguns elementos do enfoque situacional: um exame crítico de algumas das contribuições de Carlos Matus. Cien Saude Colet [Internet]. 2010[citado em 2024 jan. 08];15(5):2327-36. Disponivel em: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-81232010000500008

11. Merhy EE, Onoko R. Agir em saúde: um desafio para o público. São Paulo: Hucitec; 1997.

12. Habermas J. Éthique de la discussion. Paris: Cerf; 1992.

13. Baremblit G. Compêndio de análise institucional. 3a ed. Rio de Janeiro: Rosa dos Tempos; 1996.

14. Malta DC, Merhy EE. A micropolítica do processo de trabalho em saúde, revendo alguns conceitos. REME Rev Min Enferm [Internet]. 2003[citado em 2024 jan. 08];7(1):61-6. Disponível em: https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/reme/article/ view/50937

15. Zaffaroni C. El marco de desarrollo de base: la construcción de un sistema participativo para analizar resultados de proyectos sociales. Montevideo: Trilce; 1997.

Published

2025-05-26

Issue

Section

Reflection

How to Cite

1.
STRATEGIC PLANNING IN HEALTH IN BRAZIL: rise and decline. REME Rev Min Enferm. [Internet]. 2025 May 26 [cited 2025 Dec. 7];29. Available from: https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/reme/article/view/49473

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 > >>