Arquitectura de horizontes en emprendimiento social: innovación con tecnologías emergentes

Maria Soledad Ramirez-Montoya; José-Guadalupe González-Padrón

doi:10.35699/1983-3652.2022.25716

Autores

Maria Soledad Ramirez-Montoya Tecnologico de Monterrey, School of Humanities and Education, Monterrey, Nuevo León, Mexico https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1274-706X
José-Guadalupe González-Padrón Tecnologico de Monterrey, School of Humanities and Education, Monterrey, Nuevo León, Mexico https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7942-744X

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35699/1983-3652.2022.25716

Palavras-chave:

Design Instrucional , Inovação educacional , Empreendedorismo Social, Tecnologias emergentes , Ensino superior

Resumo

O empreendedorismo social é uma área importante para a formação no ensino superior, em que a ligação com diferentes setores é estratégica para criar opções de sustentabilidade para os cidadãos. O objetivo deste artigo é analisar a percepção do nível de domínio das competências sociais por parte dos estudantes de pós-graduação, com um curso de design inovador que integrou o método de Arquitectura de Horizontes, bem como tecnologias emergentes (realidade virtual, recursos ampliados, abertos e vídeos interactivos) para a construção de projetos empresariais que contribuam para os objetivos do desenvolvimento sustentável. O método de estudo foi misto, com triangulação simultânea, em que as escalas Likert de empreendedorismo social e inovação, bem como os grupos focais, foram aplicados a uma população de 65 estudantes, num curso de ensino a distância. Os resultados mostram a percepção de inovação educativa disruptiva na concepção do curso e o desenvolvimento da competência empresarial social, principalmente nas sub-competências de valor social, liderança e pessoal. Este artigo pode ser de valor para estudantes, professores, investigadores e decisores interessados na inovação educacional e empreendedorismo.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Referências

BARROSO, E.; MOLINA, E. y POIRÉ, P. A new framework for navigating the complexities of accelerated technological change and Internet impact on small-medium size business growth in Mexico. México: Tecnológico de Monterrey, Escuela de Gobierno y Transformación Social, 2019.

BROWN, Abbie y GREEN, Timothy D. The essentials of instructional design: connecting fundamental principles with process and practice. Third edition. New York: Routledge, 2016.

CÓZAR-GUTIÉRREZ, Ramón y SÁEZ-LÓPEZ, José Manuel. Game-based learning and gamification in initial teacher training in the social sciences: an experiment with MinecraftEdu. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, v. 13, n. 1, pág. 2, dic. 2016. DOI: 10.1186/s41239-016-0003-4. Disponible en: http://www.educationaltechnologyjournal.springeropen.com/content/13/1/2. Acceso en: 5 jul. 2021.

CRESWELL, John W. Qualitative inquiry & research design: choosing among five approaches. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, 2007.

DOMÍNGUEZ PÉREZ, Claudia; ORGANISTA SANDOVAL, Javier y LÓPEZ ORNELAS, Maricela. Instructional design for the development of digital educational contents for smartphones. Apertura, v. 10, n. 2, p. 80-93, oct. 2018. DOI: 10.32870/Ap.v10n2.1346. Disponible en: http://www.udgvirtual.udg.mx/apertura/index.php/apertura/article/view/1346. Acceso en: 5 jul. 2021.

DRACHSLER, H. y KALZ, M. The MOOC and learning analytics innovation cycle (MOLAC): a reflective summary of ongoing research and its challenges: MOLAC. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, v. 32, n. 3, p. 281-290, jun. 2016. DOI: 10.1111/jcal.12135. Disponible en: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/jcal.12135. Acceso en: 5 jul. 2021.

FIDALGO-BLANCO, Angel y col. Micro flip teaching – An innovative model to promote the active involvement of students. Computers in Human Behavior, v. 72, p. 713-723, jul. 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2016.07.060. Disponible en: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0747563216305507. Acceso en: 5 jul. 2021.

FILSER, Matthias y col. Entrepreneurship as Catalyst for Sustainable Development: Opening the Black Box. Sustainability, v. 11, n. 16, pág. 4503, ago. 2019. DOI: 10.3390/su11164503. Disponible en: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/16/4503. Acceso en: 5 jul. 2021.

GARCÍA-GONZÁLEZ, Abel y RAMÍREZ-MONTOYA, María Soledad. An instrument for evaluating the innovation of an educational platform: Reliability piloting. In: PROCEEDINGS of the Seventh International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality. León Spain: ACM, oct. 2019. p. 711-717. DOI: 10.1145/3362789.3362793. Disponible en: https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3362789.3362793. Acceso en: 5 jul. 2021.

GARCÍA-GONZÁLEZ, Abel; ROMERO-RODRIGUEZ, Luis-Miguel y col. Validation of instruments to measure social entrepreneurship competence. The OpenSocialLab project. In: 2020 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON). Porto, Portugal: IEEE, abr. 2020. p. 1338-1342. DOI: 10.1109/EDUCON45650.2020.9125382. Disponible en: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9125382/. Acceso en: 5 jul. 2021.

HARRIS, Alma y DEFLAMINIS, John. Distributed leadership in practice: Evidence, misconceptions and possibilities. Management in Education, v. 30, n. 4, p. 141-146, oct. 2016. DOI: 10.1177/0892020616656734. Disponible en: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0892020616656734. Acceso en: 5 jul. 2021.

HERNANDEZ-DE-MENENDEZ, Marcela; ESCOBAR DÍAZ, Carlos A. y MORALES-MENENDEZ, Ruben. Educational experiences with Generation Z. International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM), v. 14, n. 3, p. 847-859, sep. 2020. DOI: 10.1007/s12008-020-00674-9. Disponible en: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12008-020-00674-9. Acceso en: 5 jul. 2021.

HIDROGO, Irving y col. Mostla for engineering education: part 2 emerging technologies. International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM), v. 14, n. 4, p. 1461-1473, dic. 2020. DOI: 10.1007/s12008-020-00729-x. Disponible en: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12008-020-00729-x. Acceso en: 5 jul. 2021.

KOLLECK, Nina. Uncovering influence through Social Network Analysis: the role of schools in Education for Sustainable Development. Journal of Education Policy, v. 31, n. 3, p. 308-329, mayo 2016. DOI: 10.1080/02680939.2015.1119315. Disponible en: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/02680939.2015.1119315. Acceso en: 5 jul. 2021.

KUMAR, Amit; MANTRI, Archana y DUTTA, Rubina. Development of an augmented reality‐based scaffold to improve the learning experience of engineering students in embedded system course. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, v. 29, n. 1, p. 244-257, ene. 2021. DOI: 10.1002/cae.22245. Disponible en: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cae.22245. Acceso en: 5 jul. 2021.

LEECH, Nancy L. y ONWUEGBUZIE, Anthony J. An array of qualitative data analysis tools: A call for data analysis triangulation. School Psychology Quarterly, v. 22, n. 4, p. 557-584, dic. 2007. DOI: 10.1037/1045-3830.22.4.557. Disponible en: http://doi.apa.org/getdoi.cfm?doi=10.1037/1045-3830.22.4.557. Acceso en: 5 jul. 2021.

MARTIN, Florence; DENNEN, Vanessa P. y BONK, Curtis J. A synthesis of systematic review research on emerging learning environments and technologies. Educational Technology Research and Development, v. 68, n. 4, p. 1613-1633, ago. 2020. DOI: 10.1007/s11423-020-09812-2. Disponible en: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11423-020-09812-2. Acceso en: 5 jul. 2021.

MELETIOU-MAVROTHERIS, Maria; MAVROU, Katerina y REBELO, Piedade Vaz. The Role of Learning and Communication Technologies in Online Courses’ Design and Delivery: A Cross-National Study of Faculty Perceptions and Practices. Frontiers in Education, v. 6, pág. 558676, mar. 2021. DOI: 10.3389/feduc.2021.558676. Disponible en: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feduc.2021.558676/full. Acceso en: 5 jul. 2021.

MIRANDA, Jhonattan y col. Open Innovation Laboratories as Enabling Resources to Reach the Vision of Education 4.0. In: 2019 IEEE International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation (ICE/ITMC). Valbonne Sophia-Antipolis, France: IEEE, jun. 2019. p. 1-7. DOI: 10.1109/ICE.2019.8792595. Disponible en: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8792595/. Acceso en: 5 jul. 2021.

MORA, Nohemí y RAMOS, Luis. Red social facebook y el diseño instruccional ASSURE. Impacto Científico, v. 12, n. 1, p. 189-199, 2017. Disponible en: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Red-social-facebook-y-el-dise%5C%C3%5C%B1o-instruccional-Mora-Ramos/b4b0fa4c6a06a1c66a9f60672e4d7c24237ac27d. Acceso en: 5 jul. 2021.

ONWUEGBUZIE, Anthony y LEECH, Nancy. Linking Research Questions to Mixed Methods Data Analysis Procedures 1. The Qualitative Report, 2006. ISSN 2160-3715, 1052-0147. DOI: 10.46743/2160-3715/2006.1663. Disponible en: https://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol11/iss3/3/. Acceso en: 5 jul. 2021.

ORÚS, Carlos y col. The effects of learner-generated videos for YouTube on learning outcomes and satisfaction. Computers & Education, v. 95, p. 254-269, abr. 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2016.01.007. Disponible en: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0360131516300070. Acceso en: 5 jul. 2021.

ÖZGEN, Dilay Seda; AFACAN, Yasemin y SÜRER, Elif. Usability of virtual reality for basic design education: a comparative study with paper-based design. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, v. 31, n. 2, p. 357-377, abr. 2021. DOI: 10.1007/s10798-019-09554-0. Disponible en: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10798-019-09554-0. Acceso en: 5 jul. 2021.

PORTUGUEZ CASTRO, May; ROSS SCHEEDE, Carlos y GÓMEZ ZERMEÑO, Marcela Georgina. The Impact of Higher Education on Entrepreneurship and the Innovation Ecosystem: A Case Study in Mexico. Sustainability, v. 11, n. 20, pág. 5597, oct. 2019. DOI: 10.3390/su11205597. Disponible en: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/20/5597. Acceso en: 5 jul. 2021.

PORTUGUEZ-CASTRO, May y GÓMEZ-ZERMEÑO, Marcela Georgina. Analysis of the Opinion of Teachers on Students Participation in Entrepreneurship Activities in Higher Education. In: 2ND International Conference on Research Approaches in Social Science, Business E- Commerce and Entrepreneurship. Taipei, Taiwan: Taiwan Academy of Social Sciences, 2020. Disponible en: https://escueladehumanidades.tec.mx/dee/content/analysis-opinion-teachers-students-participation-entrepreneurship-activities-higher. Acceso en: 5 jul. 2021.

QUINN, Sarah y OWEN, Susanne. Digging deeper: Understanding the power of ‘student voice’. Australian Journal of Education, v. 60, n. 1, p. 60-72, abr. 2016. DOI: 10.1177/0004944115626402. Disponible en: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0004944115626402. Acceso en: 5 jul. 2021.

RAMIREZ-MONTOYA, Maria-Soledad y col. Emerging technologies for the proposal and design of a MOOC on social entrepreneurship. In: 2020 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON). Porto, Portugal: IEEE, abr. 2020. p. 1343-1346. DOI: 10.1109/EDUCON45650.2020.9125194. Disponible en: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9125194/. Acceso en: 5 jul. 2021.

ROMÁN-GONZÁLEZ, Marcos; PÉREZ-GONZÁLEZ, Juan-Carlos y JIMÉNEZ-FERNÁNDEZ, Carmen. Which cognitive abilities underlie computational thinking? Criterion validity of the Computational Thinking Test. Computers in Human Behavior, v. 72, p. 678-691, jul. 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2016.08.047. Disponible en: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0747563216306185. Acceso en: 5 jul. 2021.

ROSE, Emily y col. The Flipped Classroom in Emergency Medicine Using Online Videos with Interpolated Questions. The Journal of Emergency Medicine, v. 51, n. 3, 284-291.e1, sep. 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2016.05.033. Disponible en: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0736467916301639. Acceso en: 5 jul. 2021.

SÁNCHEZ-HERNÁNDEZ y MALDONADO-BRIEGAS. Sustainable Entrepreneurial Culture Programs Promoting Social Responsibility: A European Regional Experience. Sustainability, v. 11, n. 13, pág. 3625, jul. 2019. DOI: 10.3390/su11133625. Disponible en: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/13/3625. Acceso en: 5 jul. 2021.

SCHNEIDER, Michael y PRECKEL, Franzis. Variables associated with achievement in higher education: A systematic review of meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, v. 143, n. 6, p. 565-600, 2017. DOI: 10.1037/bul0000098. Disponible en: http://doi.apa.org/getdoi.cfm?doi=10.1037/bul0000098. Acceso en: 5 jul. 2021.

SMITH, Louis M. Ethics, field studies, and the paradigm crisis. In: THE paradigm dialog. Egon G. Guba. Newbury Park, California, Estados Unidos: Sage, 1990. p. 139-157.

TRAXLER, John. Ethics and ICTD Research. In: CHIB, Arul y HARRIS, Roger W. (Ed.). Linking Research to Practice. Strengthening ICT for Development Research Capacity in Asia. Singapore: ISEAS Publishing, dic. 2012. p. 68-81. DOI: 10.1355/9789814380010-012. Disponible en: https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1355/9789814380010-012/html. Acceso en: 5 jul. 2021.

ULRICH, Frank y col. Learning effectiveness of 360° video: experiences from a controlled experiment in healthcare education. Interactive Learning Environments, v. 29, n. 1, p. 98-111, ene. 2021. DOI: 10.1080/10494820.2019.1579234. Disponible en: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10494820.2019.1579234. Acceso en: 5 jul. 2021.

UNESCO. La UNESCO y los Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible, sep. 2015. Disponible en: https://es.unesco.org/sdgs. Acceso en: 5 jul. 2021.

UTOMO, Hardi y col. Developing social entrepreneurship: a study of community perception in Indonesia. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, v. 7, n. 1, p. 233-246, sep. 2019. DOI: 10.9770/jesi.2019.7.1(18). Disponible en: https://jssidoi.org/jesi/article/366. Acceso en: 5 jul. 2021.