Escrever texto e produzir código limpo
duas realidades do mesmo processo para estudantes de engenharia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-3652.2023.41439Palavras-chave:
Programação de computadores, Linguagem escrita, Educação em engenhariaResumo
A qualidade dos produtos de software depende em grande parte da capacidade dos desenvolvedores de gerar código limpo, uma vez que eles permitem aumentar o ciclo de vida do software. Portanto, é crucial melhorar as práticas pedagógicas de ensino de programação, em particular, a capacidade dos estudantes de escrever código de qualidade. Entretanto, a literatura não reconhece modelos pedagógicos abrangentes que orientam o desenvolvimento dessa capacidade de escrita, como observado na redação de textos. Este trabalho relaciona a produção de código limpo com as concepções do processo de escrita em estudantes de Engenharia da Computação. Para esse fim, utilizamos três avaliações práticas para avaliar o processo de programação de código limpo em estudantes universitários, para, posteriormente, relacionar os resultados com as percepções sobre a escrita que esse grupo tem. Os resultados mostram uma relação entre o desempenho nas tarefas de programação e o ano de ingresso, e uma correlação positiva entre a produção de código limpo e as concepções sobre a escrita. Concluímos que nosso estudo abre uma colaboração transdisciplinar. Ele pode avançar em direção a um modelo pedagógico para orientar o ensino da escrita limpa de código que contribui para produtos de software de maior qualidade.
Downloads
Referências
ALCOVER, R y col. Análisis del rendimiento académico en los estudios de informática de la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia aplicando técnicas de minerı́a de datos. In: XIII Jornadas de Enseñanza Universitaria de la Informática (JENUI 2007). Teruel, España.: [s.n.], 2007. p. 163-170. Disponible en: http://bioinfo.uib.es/~joemiro/aenui/procJenui/Jen2007/alanal.pdf.
ANICHE, Maurı́cio y col. Code smells for model-view-controller architectures. Empirical Software Engineering, Springer, v. 23, n. 4, p. 2121-2157, 2018. DOI: 10.1007/s10664-017-9540-2. Disponible en: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10664-017-9540-2.
BASTÍAS, Oscar Ancán; DÍAZ, Jaime y RODRÍGUEZ, Cristian Olivares. Evaluation of Critical Thinking in Online Software Engineering Teaching: A Systematic Mapping Study. IEEE Access, IEEE, p. 167015-167026, 2021. DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3135245. Disponible en: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/9648189.
BECKER, Brett A y QUILLE, Keith. 50 years of cs1 at sigcse: A review of the evolution of introductory programming education research. In: PROCEEDINGS of the 50th acm technical symposium on computer science education. [S.l.: s.n.], 2019. p. 338-344. DOI: 10.1145/3287324.3287432.
BEREITER, Carl y SCARMALIA, Marlene. Dos modelos explicativos de los procesos de composición escrita. Journal for the Study of Education and Development, Infancia y Aprendizaje, Fundación Infancia y Aprendizaje, n. 58, p. 43-64, 1992. DOI: 10.1080/02103702.1992.10822332. Disponible en: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/02103702.1992.10822332.
BRONCKART, Jean-Paul. Actividad verbal, textos y discursos:: por un interaccionismo socio-discursivo. [S.l.]: Fund. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 2004.
BROWN, WJ; MALVEAU, RC y col. Architectures. anti-patterns: refactoring software and projects in crisis. [S.l.]: John Wiley y Sons, 1998.
CALLE-ARANGO, Lina y ÁVILA REYES, Natalia. Obstacles, facilitators, and needs in doctoral writing: A systematic review. Studies in Continuing Education, Taylor & Francis, p. 1-19, 2022. DOI: 10.1080/0158037X.2022.2026315. Disponible en: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/0158037X.2022.2026315.
DAPOZO, Gladys y col. Capacitación en programación para incorporar el pensamiento computacional en las escuelas. Revista Iberoamericana de Tecnologı́a en Educación y Educación en Tecnologı́a, SciELO Argentina, n. 18, p. 113-121, 2016. Disponible en: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=5889939.
DAVOODIFARD, Mahshad. An Overview of Writing Process Research: Using Innovative Tasks and Techniques for a Better Understanding of L2 Writing Processes in Assessment Contexts. Studies in Applied Linguistics and TESOL, v. 21, n. 2, 2022. DOI: 10.52214/salt.v21i2.8759. Disponible en: https://journals.library.columbia.edu/index.php/SALT/article/view/8759.
DE BEAUGRANDE, Robert. Text production: Toward a science of composition. [S.l.]: Praeger, 1984. v. 11. DIDACTEXT, GRUPO DIDACTEXT Didáctica del Texto GRUPO. Modelo sociocognitivo, pragmalingüı́stico y didáctico para la producción de textos escritos. Didáctica. Lengua y Literatura, v. 15, p. 077-104, 2003. Disponible en: https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/DIDA/article/download/DIDA0303110077A/19407.
DIETZ, Linus W y col. Teaching clean code. In: PROCEEDINGS of the 1st Workshop on Innovative Software Engineering Education. [S.l.: s.n.], 2018. Disponible en: http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2066/isee2018paper06.pdf.
DIFABIO DE ANGLAT, Hilda. Hacia un inventario de escritura académica en el posgrado. Revista de orientación educacional, Universidad de Playa Ancha, n. 49, p. 37-53, 2012. Disponible en: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/descarga/articulo/4554495.pdf.
EGUILUZ, Andoni y col. Exploring the progression of early programmers in a set of computational thinking challenges via clickstream analysis. IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computing, IEEE, v. 8, n. 1, p. 256-261, 2017. DOI: 10.1109/TETC.2017.2768550. Disponible en: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/8093668.
FIGUEIREDO, José y GARCÍA-PEÑALVO, Francisco José. Strategies to increase success in learning programming. In: IEEE. 2022 International Symposium on Computers in Education (SIIE). [S.l.: s.n.], 2022. p. 1-6. DOI: 10.1109/SIIE56031.2022.9982358. Disponible en: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/9982358.
FINCHER, Sally. What are we doing when we teach programming? In: IEEE. FIE’99 Frontiers in Education. 29th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference. Designing the Future of Science and Engineering Education. Conference Proceedings (IEEE Cat. No. 99CH37011. [S.l.: s.n.], 1999. v. 1, 12a4-1. DOI: 10.1109/FIE.1999.839268. Disponible en: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/839268.
FLOWER, Linda y HAYES, J. Textos en contexto. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Asociación Internacional de Lectura, 1996. Disponible en: http://www.a43d.com.uy/jenny/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/Flowers_y_Hayes.pdf.
FOWLER, Martin. Refactoring: improving the design of existing code. [S.l.]: Addison-Wesley Professional, 2018.
GARCÍA-BORREGO, Manuel y CÓRDOBA-CABÚS, Alba. La transformación en la motivación y las aspiraciones de los estudiantes de periodismo a lo largo de tres años de grado: un análisis de las variables explicativas. Vivat Academia. Revista de Comunicación, p. 23-41, 2021. DOI: 10.15178/va.2021.154.e1232. Disponible en: https://www.vivatacademia.net/index.php/vivat/article/view/1232.
GOLDSMITH, Rosalie; WILLEY, Keith y BOUD, David. Investigating invisible writing practices in the engineering curriculum using practice architectures. European Journal of Engineering Education, Taylor & Francis, v. 44, n. 1-2, p. 71-84, 2019. DOI: 10.1080/03043797.2017.1405241. Disponible en: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/03043797.2017.1405241.
GONZÁLEZ, Martha Leticia Gaeta; GONZÁLEZ, Mercedes Zanotto y GONZÁLEZ-OCAMPO, Gabriela. Concepciones de escritura académica en estudiantes de medicina. IE Revista de Investigación Educativa de la REDIECH, Red de Investigadores Educativos Chihuahua AC, v. 11, p. 1-17, 2020. DOI: 10.33010/ie_rie_rediech.v11i0.855. Disponible en: https://www.redalyc.org/journal/5216/521662150034/521662150034.pdf.
GRIFFIN, Jean M. Designing intentional bugs for learning. In: PROCEEDINGS of the 1st UK & Ireland Computing Education Research Conference. [S.l.: s.n.], 2019. p. 1-7.
GROENEVELD, Wouter y col. Are Undergraduate Creative Coders Clean Coders? A Correlation Study. In: PROCEEDINGS of the 53rd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 1. [S.l.: s.n.], 2022. p. 314-320. DOI: 10.1145/3478431.3499345.
GUPTA, Viral; KAPUR, Parmod Kumar y KUMAR, Deepak. Modelling and measuring code smells in enterprise applications using TISM and two-way assessment. International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer, v. 7, n. 3, p. 332-340, 2016. DOI: 10.1007/s13198-016-0460-0. Disponible en: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13198-016-0460-0.
HAYES, John R. y FLOWER, Linda S. Flower. Identifying the organization of writing processes. [S.l.]: Lawrence Erlbaum Assosiates, 1980.
IQBAL MALIK, Sohail y col. A web-based model to enhance algorithmic thinking for novice programmers. E-Learning and Digital Media, SAGE Publications Sage UK: London, England, v. 18, n. 6, p. 616-633, 2021. DOI: 10.1177/204275302110269. Disponible en: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/20427530211026988.
KILNER, Kerry; COLLIE, Natalie y CLEMENT, Jennifer. Using innovative teaching practices to inspire critically engaged reading and writing in a neoliberal university environment. Higher Education Research & Development, Taylor & Francis, v. 38, n. 1, p. 110-123, 2019. DOI: 10.1080/07294360.2018.1537258. Disponible en: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/07294360.2018.1537258.
KYFONIDIS, Charalampos; MOUMOUTZIS, Nektarios y CHRISTODOULAKIS, Stavros. Block-C: A block-based programming teaching tool to facilitate introductory C programming courses. In: IEEE. 2017 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON). [S.l.: s.n.], 2017. p. 570-579. DOI: 10.1109/EDUCON.2017.7942903. Disponible en: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/7942903.
LACERDA, Guilherme y col. Code smells and refactoring: A tertiary systematic review of challenges and observations. Journal of Systems and Software, Elsevier, v. 167, pág. 110610, 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.110610. Disponible en: https:
//www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0164121220300881/pdfft?casa_token=KJpj0zf7uFgAAAAA: H6BXM-kDoEqT_GqUagfhDHRKZnUx9uA0xewQqU50T7Vgwy9PX3cilR5jHA5a_05-
noRQRTvufCk&md5=f259cb697bd1c02c96ae39cd7036fb65&pid=1-s2.0-S0164121220300881-main.pdf.
LINDGREN, Chris Aaron. Writing With Data: A Study of Coding on a Data-Journalism Team. Written Communication, SAGE Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA, v. 38, n. 1, p. 114-162, 2021. DOI: 10.1177/0741088320968061. Disponible en: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0741088320968061.
LIU, Hui; JIN, Jiahao y col. Deep learning based code smell detection. IEEE transactions on Software Engineering, IEEE, v. 47, n. 9, p. 1811-1837, 2019. DOI: 10.1109/TSE.2019.2936376. Disponible en: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/8807230.
LIU, Xiaohua y READ, John. General skill needs and challenges in university academic reading: Voices from undergraduates and language teachers. Journal of College Reading and Learning, Taylor & Francis, v. 50, n. 2, p. 70-93, 2020. DOI: 10.1080/10790195.2020.1734885. Disponible en: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10790195.2020.1734885.
LONKA, Kirsti y col. How to measure PhD students’ conceptions of academic writing–and are they related to well-being? Journal of Writing Research, 2014. DOI: 10.17239/jowr-2014.05.03.1. Disponible en: http://www.jowr.org/articles/vol5_3/JoWR_2014_vol5_nr3_Lonka_et_al.pdf.
MALIK, Sohail Iqbal y COLDWELL-NEILSON, Jo. A model for teaching an introductory programming course using ADRI. Education and Information Technologies, Springer, v. 22, n. 3, p. 1089-1120, 2017. DOI: 10.1007/s10639-016-9474-0. Disponible en: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10639-016-9474-0.
MIRAS, Mariana; SOLÉ, Isabel y CASTELLS, Nuria. Creencias sobre lectura y escritura, producción de sı́ntesis escritas y resultados de aprendizaje. Revista mexicana de investigación educativa, Consejo Mexicano de Investigación Educativa AC, v. 18, n. 57, p. 437-459, 2013. Disponible en: https://www.scielo.org.mx/pdf/rmie/v18n57/v18n57a6.pdf.
MURPHY, Ellen; CRICK, Tom y DAVENPORT, James H. An analysis of introductory university programming courses in the UK. University of Bath, 2016. Disponible en: https://purehost.bath.ac.uk/ws/portalfiles/portal/147312704.
NAVARRO, Federico y col. Panorama histórico y contrastivo de los estudios sobre lectura y escritura en educación superior publicados en América Latina. Revista signos, SciELO Chile, v. 49, p. 78-99, 2016. DOI: 10.4067/S0718-09342016000400006. Disponible en: https://www.scielo.cl/pdf/signos/v49s1/art06.pdf.
NYSTRAND, Martin y col. Rhetoric’s “audience” and linguistics’“speech community”: Implications for understanding writing, reading, and text. What writers know: The language, process, and structure of written discourse, Academic Press New York, p. 1-28, 1982.
OORT, Bart van y col. The Prevalence of Code Smells in Machine Learning projects. In: IEEE. 2021 IEEE/ACM 1st Workshop on AI Engineering-Software Engineering for AI (WAIN). [S.l.: s.n.], 2021. p. 1-8. DOI: 10.1109/WAIN52551.2021.00011. Disponible en: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/9474395/.
PÉREZ, D; HERNÁNDEZ, Carmen Requena y GONZÁLEZ, Marta Zubiaur. Evolución de motivaciones, actitudes y hábitos de los estudiantes de la Facultad de Ciencias de la Actividad Fı́sica y del Deporte de la Universidad de León. European Journal of Human Movement, Asociación Española de Ciencias del Deporte, n. 14, p. 65-79, 2005. Disponible en: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/descarga/articulo/2279075.pdf.
PROKIĆ, Simona y col. Clean Code and Design Educational Tool. In: IEEE. 2021 44th International Convention on Information, Communication and Electronic Technology (MIPRO). [S.l.: s.n.], 2021. p. 1601-1606. DOI: 10.23919/MIPRO52101.2021.9597196. Disponible en: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/9597196.
ROALD, Gunhild Marie y col. Learning from contrasts: first-year students writing themselves into academic literacy. Journal of Further and Higher Education, Taylor & Francis, v. 45, n. 6, p. 758-770, 2021. DOI: 10.1080/0309877X.2020.1813264. Disponible en: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/0309877X.2020.1813264.
RODRÍGUEZ HERNÁNDEZ, Blanca Araceli y GARCÍA VALERO, Laura Beatriz. Escritura de textos académicos: dificultades experimentadas por escritores noveles y sugerencias de apoyo. Instituto de Investigaciones en Educación de la Universidad Veracruzana, 2015. DOI: 10.25009/cpue.v0i20.1332. Disponible en: https://cpue.uv.mx/index.php/cpue/article/view/1332/2450.
SANTOS, André L. Javardise: a structured code editor for programming pedagogy in Java. In: CONFERENCE Companion of the 4th International Conference on Art, Science, and Engineering of Programming. [S.l.: s.n.], 2020. p. 120-125. DOI: 10.1145/3397537.3397561. Disponible en: https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1145/3397537.3397561.
SELWYN, Rebecca y RENAUD-ASSEMAT, Irene. Developing technical report writing skills in first and second year engineering students: a case study using self-reflection. Higher Education Pedagogies, Taylor & Francis, v. 5, n. 1, p. 19-29, 2020. DOI: 10.1080/23752696.2019.1710550. Disponible en: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/23752696.2019.1710550.
SOMMERVILLE, Ian. Engineering software products. [S.l.]: Pearson London, 2020.
TORRENT MALUJE, Catalina Andrea. Programación computacional en escuelas: una mirada de inclusión y género a una iniciativa extracurricular del Ministerio de Educación de Chile. [S.l.]: Universidad de Chile, 2019. Disponible en: https://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/170511.
TURKBEN, Tuncay. The Relationship between Fifth Grade Student’s Writing Anxiety and Blocking with Their Written Expression Skills. International Online Journal of Education and Teaching, ERIC, v. 8, n. 2, p. 998-1021, 2021. Disponible en: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12451/8378.
ULU, Hacer. Investigation of Fourth Grade Primary School Students’ Creative Writing and Story Elements in Narrative Text Writing Skills. International Journal of Progressive Education, ERIC, v. 15, n. 5, p. 273-287, 2019. DOI: 10.29329/ijpe.2019.212.18. Disponible en: https://ijpe.inased.org/makale/1126.
VALDÉS-LEÓN, Gabriel. Análisis de errores y variables sociolingüísticas: cómo escriben los estudiantes de primer año de universidad. Onomázein, Taylor & Francis, v. 58, 2022. DOI: 10.7764/onomazein.58.12. Disponible en: http://revistacienciapolitica.uc.cl/index.php/onom/article/view/58475.
VINE-JARA, Ana E. La escritura académica: percepciones de estudiantes de Ciencias Humanas y Ciencias de la Ingenierı́a de una universidad chilena. Íkala, Revista de Lenguaje y Cultura, Escuela de Idiomas, Universidad de Antioquia, v. 25, n. 2, p. 475-491, 2020. Disponible en: https://www.redalyc.org/journal/2550/255066610011/255066610011.pdf.
VOOGT, Joke y col. Computational thinking in compulsory education: Towards an agenda for research and practice. Education and Information Technologies, Springer, v. 20, p. 715-728, 2015. DOI: 10.1007/s10639-015-9412-6. Disponible en: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10639-015-9412-6.
WALTON, Gabriel. Writing skills development in an engineering geology course through practice and feedback on report submissions using a rubric. Journal of Geoscience Education, Taylor & Francis, v. 68, n. 1, p. 33-48, 2020. DOI: 10.1080/10899995.2019.1625997. Disponible en: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10899995.2019.1625997.
WEDYAN, Fadi y ABUFAKHER, Somia. Impact of design patterns on software quality: a systematic literature review. IET Software, Wiley Online Library, v. 14, n. 1, p. 1-17, 2020. DOI: 10.1049/iet-sen.2018.5446. Disponible en: https://ietresearch.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1049/iet-sen.2018.5446.
WEINTROP, David. Block-based programming in computer science education. Communications of the ACM, ACM New York, NY, USA, v. 62, n. 8, p. 22-25, 2019. DOI: 10.1145/3341221.
WING, Jeannette M. Computational thinking and thinking about computing. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, The Royal Society London, v. 366, n. 1881, p. 3717-3725, 2008. DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2008.0118. Disponible en: https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/abs/10.1098/rsta.2008.0118.
XAVIER, Marlon y MENESES, Julio. Persistence and time challenges in an open online university: a case study of the experiences of first-year learners. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, SpringerOpen, v. 19, n. 1, p. 1-17, 2022. DOI: 10.1186/s41239-022-00338-6. Disponible en: https://educationaltechnologyjournal.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s41239-022-00338-6.
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2023 Cristian Olivares-Rodríguez, Gabriel Valdés-León, Martha Vidal-Sepúlveda, Romina Oyarzún-Yañez
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Este é um artigo em acesso aberto que permite o uso irrestrito, a distribuição e reprodução em qualquer meio desde que o artigo original seja devidamente citado.
![Licença Creative Commons](https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/textolivre/management/settings/website//index.php/textolivre/manager/setup/<a%20rel="license"%20href="http:/creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"><img%20alt="Licença%20Creative%20Commons"%20style="border-width:0"%20src="https:/i.creativecommons.org/l/by/4.0/88x31.png"%20/></a><br%20/>Este%20obra%20está%20licenciado%20com%20uma%20Licença%20<a%20rel="license"%20href="http:/creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">Creative%20Commons%20Atribuição%204.0%20Internacional</a>.)
