What are the factors that influence the use of social networks as a means to serve pedagogy?

Melchor  Gómez-García; Moussa Boumadan; Roberto Soto-Varela; Ángeles Gutiérrez-García

doi:10.35699/1983-3652.2021.25420

Authors

Melchor Gómez-García Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, España https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3453-218X
Moussa Boumadan Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, España https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3334-1007
Roberto Soto-Varela Nebrija University, Madrid, España https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2105-5580
Ángeles Gutiérrez-García Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, España http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7376-6064

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35699/1983-3652.2021.25420

Keywords:

Social networks, Teacher education, Multimedia instruction, Information technology

Abstract

Social networks are a key element in young people's and teenagers' leisure time. But their influence goes beyond the field of entertainment further reaching educational and training environments. These tools can support and improve student learning, but it is clear that they can also be an inconvenience or a potential danger for the youth. The purpose of this research is to describe the profiles of teachers who use social networks as resources for their teaching, both inside and outside the classroom. It also seeks to know the characteristics that influence their incorporation as learning elements. For this reason, a secondary exploitation of the PISA 2018 database is carried out. It contains the data of 21,621 teachers of the secondary education level from the 19 regions of Spain. Multilevel analysis is used as a method of data analysis. The results point out differences in use according to the Autonomous Communities, showing the importance of the age of the teacher and the number of years of experience, both for their use in the classroom and to cover their training needs. Quality teaching requires a commitment to technological resources; therefore, decisive to know these elements in order to design teachers and educational institutions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ALCÍVAR, Cedeño et al. Brecha digital entre estudiantes del área urbana y rural, a partir del estándar de saberes digitales mínimos propuestos por la Unesco. ReHuSo: Revista de Ciencias Humanísticas y Sociales, Manabí, Ecuador, v. 2, n. 2, p. 1–17, May 2017. Available from:

ttps://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=7047202.

AREA MOREIRA, Manuel; HERNÁNDEZ RIVERO, Víctor M.; SOSA ALONSO, Juan José. Modelos de

integración didáctica de las TIC en el aula. Comunicar: Revista científica iberoamericana de comunicación y educación, Huelva, España, v. 47, p. 79–87, 2016. DOI: 10.3916/C47-2016-08. Available from: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=5400275.

BEEMT, Antoine Van Den; THURLINGS, Marieke; WILLEMS, Myrthe. Towards an understanding of social media use in the classroom: a literature review. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, v. 29, n. 1, p. 35–55, 2020. DOI: 10.1080/1475939X.2019.1695657. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2019.1695657.

CERVERÓ, Gonzalo Almerich et al. Las competencias y el uso de las Tecnologías de Información y Comunicación (TIC) por el profesorado: Estructura dimensional. REDIE: Revista Electrónica de Investigación Educativa, Baja California, México, v. 13, n. 1, p. 28–42, 2011. Available from: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=3677640.

COLL, César. El currículo escolar en el marco de la nueva ecología del aprendizaje. Aula de Innovación Educativa, Aula 219, n. 219, p. 31–36, Feb. 2013. Available from: http://diposit.ub.edu/dspace/handle/2445/53975.

CORREA, Teresa. Digital skills and social media use: how Internet skills are related to different types of Facebook use among ‘digital natives’. Information, Communication & Society, Routledge, v. 19, n. 8, p. 1095–1107, 2015. DOI: 10.1080/1369118X.2015.1084023. Available from:

https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2015.1084023.

CORTINA, Ada Freitas; BOUMADAN, Moussa; PAREDES-LABRA, Joaquín. La organización de las

escuelas que acogen programas de un ordenador por niño y el papel de los estudiantes excluidos. Análisis de 5 casos en España. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación, v. 79, n. 1, p. 175–193, 2019. DOI: 10.35362/rie7913332. Available from: https://rieoei.org/RIE/article/view/3332.

CRUZ PICHARDO, Ivanovnna Milqueya. Percepciones en el uso de las redes sociales y su aplicación en la enseñanza de las matemáticas. Pixel-Bit: Revista de Medios y Educación, n. 48, p. 165–186, 2016. DOI: 10.12795/pixelbit.2016.i48.11. Available from: https://doi.org/10.12795/pixelbit.2016.i48.11.

DUART, Josep M. Internet, redes sociales y educación. RUSC Revista de Universidad y Sociedad del Conocimiento, Barcelona, v. 6, n. 1, p. 1–2, 2009. DOI: 10.7238/rusc.v6i1.30.

ENGEN, Bård Ketil; GIÆVER, Tonje Hilde; MIFSUD, Louise. Guidelines and Regulations for Teaching Digital Competence in Schools and Teacher Education: A Weak Link? Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, v. 10, n. 2, p. 69–83, 2015. Available from: https://www.idunn.no/dk/2015/02/guidelines_and_regulations_for_teaching_digital_competence_.

ESTADÍSTICA, Instituto Nacional de. Demografía y población. 2018. Available from:

https://www.ine.es/dyngs/INEbase/es/operacion.htm?c=Estadistica_C&cid=1254736176951&menu=ultiDatos&idp=1254735572981. Visited on: 15 June 2020.

GARCÍA GONZÁLEZ, José Luis; GARCÍA RUÍZ, Rosa. Aprender entre iguales con herramientas web 2.0 y twitter en la universidad. Análisis de un caso. Edutec Revista Electrónica De Tecnología Educativa, España, n. 40, a204, June 2012. DOI: 10.21556/edutec.2012.40.367. Available from: https://doi.org/10.21556/edutec.2012.40.367.

GARCÍA PÉREZ, Rafael; REBOLLO CATALÁN, Ángeles; GARCÍA PÉREZ, Curro. Relación entre las

preferencias de formación del profesorado y su competencia digital en las redes sociales. Bordón. Revista de Pedagogía, v. 68, n. 2, p. 137–153, Mar. 2016. DOI: 10.13042/Bordon.2016.68209. Available from: https://recyt.fecyt.es/index.php/BORDON/article/view/38809.

GÓMEZ, Marisol; ROSES, Sergio; FARIAS, Pedro. El uso académico de las redes sociales en universitarios. Comunicar, Málaga, España, v. XIX, n. 38, p. 131–138, 2012. DOI: 10.3916/C38-2012-03-04. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.3916/C38-2012-03-04.

GÓMEZ-GARCÍA, Melchor et al. Formación docente en línea a distancia. Un análisis de los perfiles y la opinión de los profesores. Revista Electrónica Interuniversitaria De Formación Del Profesorado, v. 23, n. 2, p. 95–111, abr 2020. DOI: 10.6018/reifop.423001. Available from: https://doi.org/10.6018/reifop.423001.

GUZMÁN-SIMÓNA, Fernando; GARCÍA-JIMÉNEZA, Eduardo; LÓPEZ-COBO, Isabel. Undergraduate students’ perspectives on digital competence and academic literacy in a Spanish University. Computers in Human Behavior, v. 74, p. 196–204, set 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2017.04.040. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.04.040.

HUGHES, Joan E. et al. Preservice Teachers’ Social Networking Use, Concerns, and Educational

Possibilities: Trends from 2008-2012. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education, Waynesville, NC USA, v. 23, n. 2, p. 185–212, Apr. 2015. Available from: https://www.learntechlib.org/p/130448.

INSTEFJORD, Elen J.; MUNTHE, Elaine. Educating digitally competent teachers: A study of integration of professional digital competence in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, v. 67, p. 37–45, 2017. ISSN 0742-051X. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.05.016. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0742051X16302888.

LAW, Nancy; CHOW, Angela. Teacher Characteristics, Contextual Factors, and How These Affect the Pedagogical Use of ICT. In: LAW, Nancy; PELGRUM, Willem J.; PLOMP, Tjeerd (editions). Pedagogy and ICT Use. CERC Studies in Comparative Education. Dordrecht: Springer, 2008. v. 23. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4020-8928-2_6. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8928-2_6.

LÓPEZ-DE-AYALA, María-Cruz; VIZCAÍNO-LAORGA, Ricardo; MONTES-VOZMEDIANO, Manuel.

Hábitos y actitudes de los jóvenes ante las redes sociales: influencia del sexo, edad y clase social. Profesional de la Información, v. 29, n. 6, Nov. 2020. DOI: 10.3145/epi.2020.nov.04. Available from: https://revista.profesionaldelainformacion.com/index.php/EPI/article/view/86034.

MAYOR BUZÓN, Virginia; GARCÍA PÉREZ, Rafael; REBOLLO CATALÁN, Ángeles. Explorando factores predictores de la competencia digital en las redes sociales virtuales. Píxel-Bit. Revista de Medios y Educación, n. 56, p. 51–69, Feb. 2019. DOI: 10.12795/pixelbit.2019.i56.03. Available from: https://recyt.fecyt.es/index.php/pixel/article/view/67393.

O’REILLY, Tim. What Is Web 2.0. 2005. Available from: https://www.oreilly.com/pub/a/web2/archive/what-is-web-20.html. Visited on: 25 June 2020.

PERAL, Begoña Peral; GAITÁN, Jorge Arenas; RAMOS, Ángel Francisco Villarejo. De la brecha digital a la brecha psico-digital: Mayores y redes sociales. Comunicar: Revista científica iberoamericana de comunicación y educación, n. 45, p. 57–64, 2015. DOI: 10.3916/C45-2015-06. Available from: https://recyt.fecyt.es/index.php/comunicar/article/view/36817.

QUINTERO, Linda Castañeda. Aprendizaje Con Redes Sociales.Tejidos Educativos Para Los Nuevos Entornos. 1. ed. Sevilla: Editorial MAD, 2010.

QUINTERO, Linda Castañeda; ADELL, Jordi. Entornos Personales de Aprendizaje: claves para el ecosistema educativo en red. 1. ed. Alcoy: Marfil, 2013.

RODRÍGUEZ, Jesús M. Suárez et al. Las competencias del profesorado en tic: estructura básica. Educación XX1, v. 16, n. 1, 2013. ISSN 2174–5374. DOI: 10.5944/educxx1.16.1.716. Available from: http://revistas.uned.es/index.php/educacionXX1/article/view/716.

SÁNCHEZ-MARTÍNEZ, Mercedes; OTERO PUIME, Ángel. Usos de internet y factores asociados en adolescentes de la Comunidad de Madrid. Atención Primaria, v. 42, n. 2, p. 79–85, 2010. ISSN 0212-6567. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aprim.2009.05.004. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S021265670900314X.

SELWYN, Neil. Looking beyond learning: notes towards the critical study of educational technology. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, v. 26, n. 1, p. 65–73, 2010. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2009.00338.x. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2009.00338.x.

SIEMENS, George. Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, v. 2, n. 1, p. 3–10, 2005. Available from: https://jotamac.typepad.com/jotamacs_weblog/files/Connectivism.pdf.

SPAIN, IAB. Estudio anual de Redes Sociales 2019. 2019. Available from: https://iabspain.es/estudio/estudio-anual-de-redes-sociales-2019/. Visited on: 20 June 2020.

TEJEDOR, Francisco Javier Tejedor; MUÑOZ-REPISO, Ana García-Valcárcel. Sociedad tecnológica e investigación educativa. Revista española de pedagogía, v. 70, n. 251, p. 5–26, 2012. Available from: https://revistadepedagogia.org/lxx/no-251/sociedad-tecnologica-e-investigacion-educativa/101400010222/.

TIMOTHY, Teo. Modelling Facebook usage among university students in Thailand: the role of emotional attachment in an extended technology acceptance model. Interactive Learning Environments, Routledge, v. 24, n. 4, p. 745–757, 2016. DOI: 10.1080/10494820.2014.917110. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2014.917110.

WILLIAMS, Roy; KAROUSOU, Regina; MACKNESS, Jenny. Emergent learning and learning ecologies in Web 2.0. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, v. 12, n. 3, p. 39–59, Mar. 2011. DOI: 10.19173/irrodl.v12i3.883. Available from: http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/883.