Are educational robots any good for communicative English learning for primary school students?

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-3652.2023.41469

Keywords:

Robot-assisted English learning, Communicative English learning, Exploratory prototyping, Rapid prototyping

Abstract

This paper presents a pilot study that focuses on the exploratory and rapid prototyping within the human-in-the-loop control of a self-constructed and developed educational robot in assisting communicative English learning in primary Education in Madrid, Spain. The study sample was composed of 37 3rd graders that attended four English learning program sessions in November 2021, in which robot integration plays a leading role as learning material. To achieve the above, an easy-to-build, programmed and economical LEGO Education Mindstorms EV3 package was optioned. Pre-and-post questionnaires, classroom observations, and an evaluation sheet that measures self-evaluation, peer evaluation, and teacher evaluation were applied. The result reveals students’ perception of the pioneering robot and although preliminary, presents validation of the technology for English class assistance. Another finding suggests that students’ stress generated from communication in English among peers was reduced with the companion of the robot. Due to the nature of a pilot study, both the number of sessions and the sample size are limited to determine if the robot is helpful in students’ vocabulary acquisition in the long run. Further study is to be conducted with the pioneer model to teach vocabularies of different categories for a longer period. The findings of this pilot study will serve as a reference in the attempt to develop and reproduce promising robots to assist English teaching and learning that are accessible to public schools.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

BERGHE, Rianne van den et al. Social Robots for Language Learning: A Review. Review of Educational Research, v. 89, n. 2, p. 259–295, Apr. 2019. ISSN 0034-6543, 1935-1046. DOI: 10.3102/0034654318821286. Available from: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.3102/0034654318821286. Visited on: 28 Dec. 2022.

CHEN, Tsai-Yu; CHANG, Goretti B. Y. The Relationship between Foreign Language Anxiety and Learning Difficulties. Foreign Language Annals, v. 37, n. 2, p. 279–289, May 2004. ISSN 0015718X, 19449720. DOI: 10.1111/j.1944-9720.2004.tb02200.x. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2004.tb02200.x. Visited on: 28 Dec. 2022.

DEWAELE, Jean-Marc; ALFAWZAN, Mateb. Does the effect of enjoyment outweigh that of anxiety in foreign language performance? Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, v. 8, n. 1, p. 21–45, Mar. 2018. ISSN 2084-1965. DOI: 10.14746/ssllt.2018.8.1.2. Available from: https://pressto.amu.edu.pl/index.php/ssllt/article/view/12383. Visited on: 28 Dec. 2022.

DÍAZ, Marta et al. Building up child-robot relationship for therapeutic purposes: From initial attraction towards long-term social engagement. In: 2011 IEEE International Conference on Automatic Face & Gesture Recognition (FG). [S.l.: s.n.], Mar. 2011. p. 927–932. DOI: 10.1109/FG.2011.5771375.

EATON, Sarah Elaine. Global trends in language learning in the 21st century. Calgary: Eaton International Consulting, 2010. ISBN 9780973359466.

ELLIS, Nick C. Essentials of a Theory of Language Cognition. en. The Modern Language Journal, v. 103, p. 39–60, Jan. 2019. ISSN 00267902. DOI: 10.1111/modl.12532. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/modl.12532. Visited on: 28 Dec. 2022.

GAYED, John Maurice et al. Exploring an AI-based writing Assistant’s impact on English language learners. en. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, v. 3, p. 100055, 2022. ISSN 2666920X. DOI: 10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100055. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2666920X22000108. Visited on: 28 Dec. 2022.

GERALD, Banda. A Brief Review of Independent, Dependent and One Sample t-test. International Journal of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, v. 4, n. 2, p. 50, Aug. 2018. ISSN 2575-5927. DOI: 10.11648/j.ijamtp.20180402.13. Available from: https://www.sciencepublishinggroup.com/journal/paperinfo?journalid=322&doi=10.11648/j.ijamtp.20180402.13. Visited on: 28 Dec. 2022.

GUTIÉRREZ GARCÍA, María Angeles et al. A Smart Toy to Enhance the Decision-Making Process at Children’s Psychomotor Delay Screenings: A Pilot Study. EN. Journal of Medical Internet Research, v. 19, n. 5, e7533, May 2017. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.7533. Available from: https://www.jmir.org/2017/5/e171. Visited on: 28 Dec. 2022.

HAN, Jeong-Hye; KIM, Dong-Ho; KIM, Jong-Won. Physical Learning Activities with a Teaching Assistant Robot in Elementary School Music Class. In: 2009 Fifth International Joint Conference on INC, IMS and IDC. [S.l.: s.n.], Aug. 2009. p. 1406–1410. DOI: 10.1109/NCM.2009.407.

KANDA, Takayuki et al. Interactive Robots as Social Partners and Peer Tutors for Children: A Field Trial. Human–Computer Interaction, v. 19, n. 1-2, p. 61–84, June 2004. ISSN 0737-0024. DOI: 10.1080/07370024.2004.9667340. Available from: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/07370024.2004.9667340. Visited on: 28 Dec. 2022.

KHALIFA, AlBara; KATO, Tsuneo; YAMAMOTO, Seiichi. Joining-in-type Humanoid Robot Assisted Language Learning System. In: PROCEEDINGS of the Tenth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC’16). Portorož, Slovenia: European Language Resources Association (ELRA), May 2016. p. 245–249. Available from: https://aclanthology.org/L16-1037. Visited on: 28 Dec. 2022.

KOAY, K. L. et al. Prototyping realistic long-term human-robot interaction for the study of agent migration. In: 2016 25th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN). [S.l.: s.n.], Aug. 2016. p. 809–816. ISSN: 1944-9437. DOI: 10.1109/ROMAN.2016.7745212.

KOCAMAN, Orhan. Factors impeding the learning of a second language in Spanish school system: Valladolid University Sample. en. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, v. 13, n. 2, p. 578–592, Oct. 2017. ISSN 1305-578X. Available from: https://www.jlls.org/index.php/jlls/article/view/740. Visited on: 28 Dec. 2022.

KRASHEN, Stephen D. Principles and Practice in Second Language Acquisition. United States: Alemany Press, 1982.

LEE, Sungjin et al. Cognitive effects of robot-assisted language learning on oral skills. In: PROCEEDINGS. Tokyo: AESOP, SLaTE, NICT & LASS, 2010. Available from: AESOP,%20SLaTE,%20NICT%20&%20LASS,. Visited on: 22 Dec. 2022.

LUPYAN, Gary; CLARK, Andy. Words and the World: Predictive Coding and the Language-Perception-Cognition Interface. Current Directions in Psychological Science, v. 24, n. 4, p. 279–284, Aug. 2015. ISSN 0963-7214, 1467-8721. DOI: 10.1177/0963721415570732. Available from: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0963721415570732. Visited on: 28 Dec. 2022.

MARTIN-RUIZ, Maria Luisa et al. Foundations of a Smart Toy Development for the Early Detection of Motoric Impairments at Childhood. International Journal of Pediatric Research, v. 1, n. 2, 2015. Available from: https://clinmedjournals.org/articles/ijpr/international-journal-of-pediatric-research-ijpr-1-011.php?jid=ijpr. Visited on: 28 Dec. 2022.

MUBIN, Omar et al. A review of the applicability of robots in education. Technology for Education and Learning 2013, v. 1, n. 9, Jan. 2013. DOI: 10.2316/Journal.209.2013.1.209-0015. Available from: https://www.actapress.com/PaperInfo.aspx?paperId=43268. Visited on: 28 Dec. 2022.

RANDALL, Natasha. A Survey of Robot-Assisted Language Learning (RALL). ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction, v. 9, n. 1, p. 1–36, Jan. 2020. ISSN 2573-9522. DOI: 10.1145/3345506. Available from: https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3345506. Visited on: 28 Dec. 2022.

REICH-STIEBERT, Natalia; EYSSEL, Friederike; HOHNEMANN, Charlotte. Exploring University Students’ Preferences for Educational Robot Design by Means of a User-Centered Design Approach. International Journal of Social Robotics, v. 12, n. 1, p. 227–237, Jan. 2020. ISSN 1875-4791, 1875-4805. DOI: 10.1007/s12369-019-00554-7. Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12369-019-00554-7. Visited on: 28 Dec. 2022.

SHIN, Sooyoung et al. A Review of the Participant Observation Method in Journalism: Designing and Reporting. Review of Communication Research, v. 10, 2022. ISSN 22554165. DOI: 10.12840/ISSN.2255-4165.035. Available from: https://www.rcommunicationr.org/index.php/rcr/article/view/133. Visited on: 28 Dec. 2022.

TAHIRU, Fati. AI in Education: A Systematic Literature Review. ng. Journal of Cases on Information Technology, v. 23, n. 1, p. 1–20, Jan. 2021. ISSN 1548-7717, 1548-7725. DOI: 10.4018/JCIT.2021010101. Available from: https://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/JCIT.2021010101. Visited on: 28 Dec. 2022.

VIDHIASI DHION, Meitreya. Classroom Observation and Research. Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu-Ilmu Maritim, v. 3, n. 1, p. 6–13, 2018. DOI: 10.6084/M9.FIGSHARE.7988522.V1. Available from: https://figshare.com/articles/CLASSROOM_OBSERVATION_AND_RESEARCH/7988522/1. Visited on: 28 Dec. 2022.

WU, Wen-Chi Vivian; WANG, Rong-Jyue; CHEN, Nian-Shing. Instructional design using an in-house built teaching assistant robot to enhance elementary school English-as-a-foreign-language learning. Interactive Learning Environments, v. 23, n. 6, p. 696–714, Nov. 2015. ISSN 1049-4820, 1744-5191. DOI: 10.1080/10494820.2013.792844. Available from: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10494820.2013.792844. Visited on: 28 Dec. 2022.

YAMAMOTO, Satoshi et al. Trial of Using Robotic Pet as Human Interface of Multimedia Education System for Pre-school Aged Child in Kindergarten. In: 2006 SICE-ICASE International Joint Conference. Busan: [s.n.], Oct. 2006. p. 3398–3403. DOI: 10.1109/SICE.2006.315079.

ZAMFIRESCU-PEREIRA, J.D. et al. Fake It to Make It: Exploratory Prototyping in HRI. In: COMPANION of the 2021 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. Boulder CO USA: ACM, Mar. 2021. p. 19–28. ISBN 9781450382908. DOI: 10.1145/3434074.3446909. Available from: https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3434074.3446909. Visited on: 28 Dec. 2022.

Downloads

Published

2023-01-02

How to Cite

YU, X.; GUTIERREZ-GARCIA, M. A.; SOTO-VARELA, R. Are educational robots any good for communicative English learning for primary school students?. Texto Livre, Belo Horizonte-MG, v. 16, p. e41469, 2023. DOI: 10.1590/1983-3652.2023.41469. Disponível em: https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/textolivre/article/view/41469. Acesso em: 17 jul. 2024.

Most read articles by the same author(s)