A comparison of analyses from the semiological point of view

the theme of Mozart’s Symphony in G minor, K 550

Authors

  • Jean-Jacques Nattiez
  • Sandra Loureiro de Freitas Reis Federal University of Minas Gerais

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35699/2317-6377.2003.55783

Keywords:

Epistemology, methodology, semiology, comparative analysis, Mozart

Abstract

The aim of this contribution is to classify and compare some of the most important analyses of the theme of the Symphony in G minor of Mozart, K. 550: Abert, Schenker, Réti, Cooke, Stefani, Lerdahl and Jackendoff. To achieve this, a typology of analyses is presented: distinction is made between analysis with a semantic orientation and immanent analyses. The latter are in their turn classified in two families: taxonomic and linear. The comparison of analyses is undertaken according to three questions: is the analysis based on an explicit methodology or not? Does the model conceive the work according to a hierarchy of levels? What is the semiological pertinence of the analysis (reference is made here to the theory of tripartition which distinguished between the poietic, neutral and aesthesic levels)? Reference to the performance of this symphony is done when it is relevant. In conclusion, it is
proposed to superimpose “lines” of analysis in order to facilitate comparison.

Author Biography

  • Jean-Jacques Nattiez

    Jean-Jacques Nattiez is considered a pioneer of musical semiology. He developed the so-called tripartition model, proposed by Jean Molino, in his theoretical works ("Fondements d’une sémiologie de la musique," 1975; "Musicologie générale et sémiologie," 1987). He applied this model to Wagner ("Tétralogies," 1983; "Wagner androgyne," 1990) and to Hanslick, Gould, and Boulez, in a collection of articles, "Le combat de Chronos et d’Orphée," to be published soon in Brazil by Editora Via Lettera and Livraria, in a translation by Luiz Paulo Sampaio. Jean-Jacques Nattiez also worked on the relationships between music and literature ("Proust musicien," 1984, reissued in 1999), and in the field of ethnomusicology, he studied the music of the Inuit, Aïnou, Chukchi, and Baganda peoples, publishing several records. His current research focuses on musical historiography from a semiological perspective.

References

ABERT, H. W. A. Mozart. Leipzig : Breitkopf und Härtel, 1923-4. p. 479-490. vol. II. Trad. inglesa in Broder, 1967. p. 69-83.

BENT, I. „Analysis“, in The New Grove Dictionary of Music and Musicians, S. Sadie ed., 1980. p. 340-388. vol I. Reimpressão revista e modificada: Analysis. The Norton/Grove Handbooks in Music. New York, London: Norton, 1987.

BERNSTEIN, L. The Unanswered Question. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1976.

BRODER, N. Mozart : Symphony in G Minor, K. 550. New York: Norton, Norton Critical Scores, 1967.

COOK, N. A Guide to Musical Analysis. Londres: Dent, 1987.

COOKE, D. The Language of Music. Londres: Oxford University Press, 1959.

DE VOTO, M. “Analysis”, in The New Harvard Dictionary of Music, D. Randel ed. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1986. p. 37-38.

DUNSBY, J., WHITTALL, A. Music Analysis in Theory and Practice. London: Faber, 1988.

FÉTIS, F.J. [Compte-rendu de concert, Paris, 11 mai 1828], Revue musicale, vol. III, 1828. p. 372.

IMBERTY, M.: Entendre la musique. Paris: Dunod, 1979.

IMBERTY, M. Les écritures du temps. Paris: Dunod, 1981.

KERMAN, J. Contemplating Music. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1985.

LERDAHL, F., JACKENDOFF, R. A Generative Theory of Tonal Music. Cambridge: IT Press, 1983.

MARTY, J.P. The Tempo Indications of Mozart. New Haven-London: Yale University Press, 1988.

MEYER, L. Explaining Music. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1973.

MILA, M. Le sinfonie di Mozart. Turin: Giappichelli, 1967.

MOLINO, J. « Fait musical et sémiologie de la musique ». Montréal: Musique en jeu, n. 7, janvier 1975, p. 7-62.

NARMOUR, E. Beyond Schenkerism. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1977.

NATTIEZ, J.-J., HIRBOUR-PAQUETTE, L. « Analyse musicale et sémiologie : à propos du prélude de Pelléas ». Montréal : Musique en jeu, n. 10, mars 1973, p. 42-69.

NATTIEZ, J.-J. Fondements d’une sémiologie de la musique. Paris: Union Générale d’Editions, 1975. p. 10-18.

NATTIEZ, J.-J. Musicologie générale et sémiologie. Paris : Christian Bourgois éditeur, 1987. Trad. inglesa. Music and Discourse. Princeton : Princeton University Press, 1990.

NATTIEZ, J.-J. “Musica e significato”, in Nattiez, J.-J. (ed.). Enciclopedia della Musica, II - Il sapere musicale. Torino : Einaudi, 2002a. p. 206-238.

NATTIEZ, J.-J. « O modelo tripartite de semiologia musical : o exemplo de La Cathédrale engloutie, de Debussy ». In :Debates, UNIRIO, n. 6, nov. 2002, 2002b. p. 7-39.

OULIBICHEFF, A. Nouvelle biographie de Mozart. Moscou: 1843. Trad. inglesa de um excerto in Broder, 1967. p. 105-9.

REICHA, A . Traité de mélodie. Paris: Scherff, 1814.

RÉTI, R. The Thematic Process in Music. London: Faber, 1951.

RUWET, N. « Méthodes d’analyse en musicologie », Revue belge de musicologie, 1966. pp. 65-90. vol. XX. Reimpressão in Ruwet 1972, p. 100-134.

RUWET, N. Musique, langage, poésie. Paris : Seuil, 1972.

SCHENKER, H. Das Meisterwerk in der Musik, vol. II. Munich: Drei Masken Verlag, 1926. Reed. Hildesheim - New York: Georg Olms Verlag, 1974.

SCHRADE, L. Vom Nachleben Mozarts. Berne, Munich: 1964.

SCHUMANN, R. Gesammelte Schriften, 5. ed., vol 1. Kreisig: 1914.

SMISMANS-DELIEGE, I. Les règles préférentielles de groupement dans la perception musicale. Mémoire de licence. Bruxelles: Université libre de Bruxelles, 1985.

STEFANI, G. Introduzione alla Semiotica della Musica. Palerme: Sellerio Editore, 1976.

TOVEY, D. “Sonata Form”, in Encyclopedia Britannica, 11. ed., vol. XXV. New York: 1911.

Published

2003-07-01

Issue

Section

Translations

How to Cite

“A Comparison of Analyses from the Semiological Point of View: The Theme of Mozart’s Symphony in G Minor, K 550”. 2003. Per Musi, no. 08 (July): 5-40. https://doi.org/10.35699/2317-6377.2003.55783.

Most read articles by the same author(s)