Interdisciplinarity and Contextualization in the Higher Education Chemistry Course: An Investigation Enveloped in the Bias of the Animal Issue
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.28976/1984-2686rbpec2023u9831007Keywords:
animal issue, interdisciplinarity, Teaching of ChemistryAbstract
In this work, we start from the assumption that dealing with the animal issue in education has become increasingly relevant. This statement gains strength in the examination of official documents for education in its various modalities, since they seek to include themes that stimulate ethical, solidary and citizen thinking beyond the compartmentalized. Thus, we take as essential the act of “greening up” the disciplines taking into account what is contextual to them. With this in mind, we propose to carry out a survey in order to understand how Chemistry professors see contextualization and interdisciplinarity, which includes aspects of the animal issue, in their disciplines. For that, we defined a cut that covers public institutions of higher education in Minas Gerais, building an investigation through questionnaires previously submitted to the pilot experience and, later, to the content analysis. As part of the results, we bring the categories “The animal issue and its crossing” and “Pedagogical practices in the classroom”. From the treatment of the data, we discussed the hypotheses raised and we found that there are understandings both contrary to the insertion of the animal theme due to a scarce relationship between it and the course, and of not only being able to work in the classroom, but already being present, with the interdisciplinarity being a means for this inclusion.
References
Bardin, L. (2016). Análise de conteúdo (L. A. Reto, & A. Pinheiro, Trad.). Edições 70.
Bell, J. (2008). Projeto de pesquisa: Guia para pesquisadores iniciantes em educação, saúde e ciências sociais (M. F. Lopes, Trad.). Artmed.
Berchielli, T. T., Pires, A. V., & Oliveira, S. G. (2006). Nutrição de ruminantes. Funep.
Fazenda, I. C. A. (2012). Interdisciplinaridade: história, teoria e pesquisa. Papirus.
Fernandes, K. G., & Flôr, C. C. C. (2020). O veganismo, a questão animal e a educação em ciências na educação básica: Um olhar para a literatura da área. In I. B. de Oliveira, M. D. Pletsch, T. V. Pereira, & Y. Ribeiro (Orgs.), Didática(s) entre diálogos, insurgências e políticas: tensões e perspectivas na relação entre novas epistemologias, biodiversidade, diferença, democracia e inclusão (pp. 1296–1303). Faperj/CNPq/Capes/Endipe/DP et Alii.
Fernandes, K. G., Freitas-Reis, I., & Sousa, R. A. (27 de setembro a 01 de outubro, 2021). A questão animal e a Licenciatura em Química: Uma revisão sistemática [Apresentação de trabalho]. XIII Encontro Nacional de Pesquisa em Educação em Ciências (ENPEC).
Furlan, A. L. D., & Fischer, M. L. (2020). Métodos alternativos ao uso de animais como recurso didático: Um novo paradigma bioético para o ensino da zoologia. Educação em Revista, 36, e230590, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-4698230590
Gil, A. C. (2019). Métodos e técnicas de pesquisa social. Atlas.
Goulson, D., Nicholls, E., Botías, C., & Rotheray, E. L. (2015). Bee declines driven by combined stress from parasites, pesticides, and lack of flowers. Science, 347(6229), 1255957. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1255957
Greif, S., & Tréz, T. (2000). A verdadeira face da experimentação animal: sua saúde em perigo. Sociedade Educacional Fala Bicho.
Instituto Nacional de Estudos e Pesquisas Educacionais Anísio Teixeira (INEP). (2019). Censo da Educação Superior 2018: Notas estatísticas. https://download.inep.gov.br/educacao_superior/censo_superior/documentos/2019/censo_da_educacao_superior_2018-notas_estatisticas.pdf
Japiassu, H. (2006). O sonho transdisciplinar: E as razões da filosofia. Imago.
Klein, J. T. (2004). Interdisciplinarity and complexity: an evolving relationship. Emergence: Complexity and Organization, 6(1), 2–10.
Low, P., Panksepp, J., Reiss, D., Edelman, D., Van Swinderen, B., & Koch, C. (2012). Francis Crick Memorial Conference. http://fcmconference.org/#
Morin, E. (2017). A cabeça bem-feita: repensar a reforma: reformar o pensamento (E. Jacobina, Trad.). Bertrand Brasil.
Nicolescu, B. (1999). O manifesto da transdisciplinaridade (L. P. Souza, Trad.). Triom.
Parecer CNE/CES 1.303/2001 (2001). Diretrizes Curriculares Nacionais para os Cursos de Química. http://portal.mec.gov.br/sesu/arquivos/pdf/130301Quimica.pdf
Pereira, B. S. A., & Santos Menezes, J. M. (2022). Livro didático de química e contextualização no ensino médio: prática docente em um município do Amazonas (Brasil). Revista Ensino de Ciências e Humanidades — RECH, 6(1), 101–117. https://periodicos.ufam.edu.br/index.php/rech/article/view/10058
Schuck, C., & Ribeiro, R. (2018). Comendo o planeta: Impactos ambientais da criação e consumo de animais. Sociedade Vegetariana Brasileira.
SVB. (20 de maio, 2020). Pesquisa do IBOPE aponta crescimento histórico no número de vegetarianos no Brasil. https://www.svb.org.br/2469-pesquisa-do-ibope-aponta-crescimento-historico-no-numero-de-vegetarianos-no-brasil
SVB. (2 de agosto, 2021). Brasileiros reduzem consumo de carne; estabelecimentos se adaptam, revela IPEC. https://www.svb.org.br/2648-brasileiros-reduzem-consumo-de-carne-estabelecimentos-se-adaptam-revela-nova-pesquisa-do-ipec
Wartha, E. J., & Faljoni-Alário, A. (2005). A contextualização do ensino de química através do livro didático. QNEsc, (22), 42–47. http://qnesc.sbq.org.br/online/qnesc22/a09.pdf
Wartha, E. J., Silva, E. L., & Bejarano, N. R. R. (2013). Cotidiano e contextualização no ensino de química. QNEsc, 35(2), 84–91. http://qnesc.sbq.org.br/online/qnesc35_2/04-CCD-151-12.pdf
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Karine Gabrielle Fernandes, Ivoni Freitas-Reis, Rafael Arromba de Sousa
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The authors are responsible for the veracity of the information provided and for the content of the papers.
The authors who publish in this journal fully agree with the following terms:
- The authors attest that the work is unpublished, that is, it has not been published in another journal, event notices or equivalent.
- The authors attest that they did not submit the paper to another journal simultaneously.
- The authors retain the copyright and grant to RPBEC the right of first publication, with the work licensed simultaneously under a Creative Commons Attribution License, which allows the sharing of the work with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- The authors attest that they own the copyright or the written permission from copyright owners of figures, tables, large texts, etc. that are included in the paper.
- Authors are authorized to take additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (for example, to publish in institutional repository or as a book chapter), with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) after the publication in order to increase the impact and citation of published work.
In case of identification of plagiarism, inappropriate republishing and simultaneous submissions, the authors authorize the Editorial Board to make public what happened, informing the editors of the journals involved, any plagiarized authors and their institutions of origin.
