Translation, cultural adaptation and validation of the Diabetes Self-Report Tool

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35699/2316-9389.2023.38826

Keywords:

Diabetes Mellitus, Translating, Surveys and Questionnaires, Validation Study, Brazil

Abstract

Objective: to carry out translation, cultural adaptation, and validation of the Diabetes Self-Report Instrument for application in the Brazilian context. Methods: methodological study carried out with 132 professionals, between 2016 and 2018, in six steps: 1 - Initial translation; 2 - Synthesis of the translation; 3 - Back translation; 4 - Evaluation by the judging committee; 5 - Cultural adequacy (pre-test); and 6 - Reability. There was participation of professionals from multidisciplinary teams involved in the treatment of diabetes through the e-surv platform. Results: among the participants, there was a predominance of females (73.5%), professionals with specialization (Lato Sensu postgraduate degree) (51.5%) and with experience in caring for people with diabetes (84.4%). The Content Validity Index (CVI) was satisfactory (0.850). The instrument showed good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.878). The instrument's reliability analysis, carried out by calculating the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), indicated adequate agreement in all measurements, 0.878 (95% CI: 0.864 - 0.891), with mean weighted Kappa of 0.714 and indices above 0. 60 out of 85% of the items, showing good test-retest agreement. Conclusion: the translated and culturally adapted version of the Diabetes Self-report Instrument showed good reliability, acceptability, and satisfactory temporal stability according to international parameters, and can be used by healthcare professionals for self-report of diabetes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Sun H, Saeedi P, Karuranga S, Pinkepank M, Ogurtsova K, Duncan B, et al. Atlas, IDF Diabetes Atlas: Global, regional and country-level diabetes prevalence estimates for 2021 and projections for 2045. Diabetes Research And Clinical Practice [Internet]. 2022[citado em 2022 ago. 22];183:109-19. Disponível em: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168822721004782

Liu J, Bai R, Chai Z, Cooper ME, Zimmet PZ, Zhang L. Low- and middle-income countries demonstrate rapid growth of type 2 diabetes: an analysis based on Global Burden of Disease 1990-2019 data. Diabetologia [Internet]. 2022[citado em 2022 maio 15];65(8):1339-52. Disponível em: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9118183/

Ministério da Saúde (BR). Vigitel Brasil 2021: vigilância de fatores de risco e proteção para doenças crônicas por inquérito telefônico: estimativas sobre frequência e distribuição sociodemográfica de fatores de risco e proteção para doenças crônicas nas capitais dos 26 estados brasileiros e no Distrito Federal em 2021. Brasília: MS; 2021[citado em 2022 ago. 15]. Disponível em: http://plataforma.saude.gov.br/vigitel

Cole JB, Florez JC. Genetics of diabetes mellitus and diabetes complications. Nat Rev Nephrol. [Internet]. 2020[citado em 2022 jun. 13];16(7):377-90. Disponível em: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41581-020-0278-5

Nunes LB, Santos JCD, Reis IA, Torres HDC. Atitudes para o autocuidado em diabetes mellitus tipo 2 na Atenção Primária. Acta Paul Enferm [Internet]. 2021[citado em 2022 jul. 30];34:eAPE001765. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.37689/acta-ape/2021AO001765

Kime N, Pringle A, Zwolinsky S, Vishnubala D. How prepared are healthcare professionals for delivering physical activity guidance to those with diabetes? A formative evaluation. BMC Health Serv Res. [Internet]. 2020[citado em 2022 jan. 3];20(1):8. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-4852-0

Schoen DE, Gausia K, Glance DG, Thompson SC. Improving rural and remote practitioners' knowledge of the diabetic foot: findings from an educational intervention. J Foot Ankle Res. [Internet]. 2016[citado em fev. 15];9:26. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13047-016-0157-2

Siddiqi A, Zafar S, Sharma A, Quaranta A. Diabetes mellitus and periodontal disease: the call for interprofessional education and interprofessional collaborative care - A systematic review of the literature. J Interprof Care. [Internet]. 2022[citado em 2022 mar. 30];36(1):93-101. Disponível: https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2020.1825354

Alotaibi A, Gholizadeh L, Al-Ganmi A, Perry L. Examining perceived and actual diabetes knowledge among nurses working in a tertiary hospital. Appl Nurs Res. [Internet]. 2017[citado em 2022 mar. 15];35:24-9. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apnr.2017.02.014

Drass JA, Muir-Nash J, Boykin PC, Turek JM, Baker KL. Perceived and actual level of knowledge of diabetes mellitus among nurses. Diab Care. [Internet]. 1989[citado em 2021 mar. 10];12(5):351-6. Disponível em: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2721344/#:~:text=A%20moderately%20low%20negative%20correlation,of%2064%25%20on%20the%20DBKT

Streiner DL, Kottner J. Recommendations for reporting the results of studies of instrument and scale development and testing. J Adv Nurs. 2014[citado em 2021 jan. 13];70(9):1970-9. Disponível em: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24684713/

Deirawi KM, Zuraikat N. Registered nurses' actual and perceived knowledge of diabetes mellitus. J Nurses Staff Dev. [Internet]. 2001[citado em 2021 jan. 13];17(1):5-11. Disponível em: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12759934/#:~:text=Nurses%20actual%20and%20perceived%20knowledge,caring%20for%20patients%20with%20diabetes

Yacoub MI, Demeh WM, Darawad MW, Barr JL, Saleh AM, Saleh MY. An assessment of diabetes-related knowledge among registered nurses working in hospitals in Jordan. Int Nurs Rev. [Internet]. 2014[citado em 2020 ago. 1];61(2):255-62. Disponível em: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24571542/#:~:text=The%20Diabetes%20Self%2DReport%20Tool,from%20seven%20hospitals%20in%20Jordan

Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000[citado em 2020 nov. 22];25(24):3186-91. Disponível em: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11124735/

Polit DF, Beck CT. The content validity index: are you sure you know what's being reported? Critique and recommendations. Res Nurs Health. [Internet]. 2006[citado em 2021 set. 13];29(5):489-97. Disponível em: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16977646/

Alexandre NMC, Gallasch CH, Lima MHM, Rodrigues RCM. Reliability in the development and evaluation of measurement instruments in the health field. Rev Eletrônica Enferm. [Internet]. 2013[citado em 2020 ago. 20];15(3):802-9. Disponível em: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/263855356_Reliability_in_the_development_and_evaluation_of_measurement_instruments_in_the_health_field

Reichenheim M, Bastos JL. What, what for and how? Developing measurement instruments in epidemiology. Rev Saúde Pública. [Internet]. 2021[citado em 2022 fev. 18];55(40). Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.11606/s1518-8787.2021055002813

Ball HL. Conducting Online Surveys. J Hum Lact. [Internet]. 2019[citado em 2022 fev. 18];35(3):413-7. Disponível em: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0890334419848734?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori%3Arid%3Acrossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub++0pubmed&

Stewart AL, Thrasher AD, Goldberg J, Shea JA. A framework for understanding modifications to measures for diverse populations. J Aging Health. [Internet]. 2012[citado em 2020 ago. 20];24(6):992-1017. Disponível em: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3768261/

Pagano AS, Reis IA, Torres HC. Empoderamento do pesquisador nas Ciências da Saúde. Belo Horizonte: Tribo da Ilha; 2015. 250p.

Santos CJ, Costa PJMS. Adaptação transcultural e validação para o Português (Brasil) do Parent Attitudes About Childhood Vaccine (PACV). Ciênc Saúde Colet. [Internet]. 2022[citado em 2020 ago. 20]; 27(5):2057-70. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232022275.11802021

Vieira GLC, Pagano AS, Reis IA, Rodrigues JSN, Torres HC. Translation, cultural adaptation and validation of the Diabetes Attitudes Scale - third version into Brazilian Portuguese. Rev Latinoam Enferm [Internet]. 2017[citado em 2022 set. 12];25:e2875. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.1404.2875

Braun S, Sánchez Gelos D, Ángel A, Mejía R. Adaptación transcultural y validación de la Escala de Autoeficacia/Tentaciones en Argentina. Medicina (B Aires). [Internet]. 2021[citado em 2022 set. 18];81(4):602-10. Disponível em: http://www.scielo.org.ar/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0025-76802021000400602

Francisco MA. Instruments that measure nurses' knowledge about diabetes: an integrative review. J Nurs Meas. [Internet]. 2013[citado em 2022 ago. 13];21(1):137-52. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1891/1061-3749.21.1.137

Additional Files

Published

2023-01-19

Issue

Vol. 27 (2023)

Section

Research

License

Copyright (c) 2023 REME-Revista Mineira de Enfermagem

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

1.
Translation, cultural adaptation and validation of the Diabetes Self-Report Tool. REME Rev Min Enferm. [Internet]. 2023 Jan. 19 [cited 2026 Feb. 5];27. Available from: https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/reme/article/view/38826

Most read articles by the same author(s)