Reflective thinking in Nursing
Use of debriefing as a pedagogical element
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35699/2316-9389.2022.38846Keywords:
Simulation Exercise, Learning, Nursing, Students, Nursing, Thinking, Formative FeedbackAbstract
Objective: to understand how debriefing emerges as a pedagogical element in the development of reflective thinking in Nursing. Method: a single-case study with a qualitative approach developed in the Health Simulation Center (Centro de Simulación en Salud, CESISA) belonging to Universidad de Costa Rica. The data were collected between August and October 2018 through documentary analysis, non-participant observation and semi-structured interviews with professors, students and technicians. Results: the data indicate that debriefing is a pedagogical element in the development of reflective thinking when everyone understands the role of this method, they seek to follow the basic assumption that everyone is intelligent and willing to improve, ensuring a safe environment; when all stages of the simulation are planned with clear learning objectives; and when the professor assumes a facilitator stance. Conclusion: a debriefing session is a pedagogical element that needs other associated factors to fulfill its role in the development of reflective thinking.
Downloads
References
Conselho Federal de Enfermagem. Aprova o novo código de ética dos profissionais de Enfermagem. Resolução COFEN nº 564/2017. Brasília: COFEN; 2017.
Dickison P, Haerling KA, Lasater K. Integrating the national council of state boards of nursing clinical judgment model into nursing educational frameworks. J Nurs Educ. 2019[citado em 2022 mar. 11];58(2):72-8. Disponível em: http://dx.doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20190122-03
Collin ACV, Giuliano D. A concept analysis of critical thinking: a guide for nurse educators. Nurs Educ Today. 2017[citado em 2022 mar. 11];49:106-9. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2016.11.007
Bortolato-Major C. Debriefing evaluation in nursing clinical simulation: a cross-sectional study. Rev Bras Enferm. 2019[citado em 2022 mar. 11];72(3):825-31. Disponível em: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2018-0103
Oliveira SN, Massaroli A, Martini JG, Rodrigues J. From theory to practice, operating the clinical simulation in Nursing teaching. Rev Bras Enferm. 2018[citado em 2022 mar. 22];71(Suppl4):1896-903. Disponível em: http://www.scielo.br/pdf/reben/v71s4/pt_0034-7167reben-71-s4-1791.pdf
Inascl Standards Committee. INACSL standards of best practice: simulation SM simulation glossary. Clin Simul Nurs. 2016[citado em 2022 mar. 20];12(Suppl1):39-47. Disponível em: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2016.09.012
Hall K, Tori K. Best Practice recommendations for debriefing in simulation-based education for Australian undergraduate nursing students: an integrative review. Clin Simul Nurs. 2017[citado em 2022 mar. 20];13(1):39-50. Disponível em: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2016.10.006
Inacls, Standards Committee, Decker S, Alinier G, Crawford SB, Gordon RM, & Wilson C. Healthcare simulation standards of best practice TM the debriefing process. Clin Simul Nurs. 2021[citado em 2022 jun. 19];58(1):27-32. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2021.08.011
Secheresse T, Lima L, Pansu P. Focusing on explicit debriefing for novice learners in healthcare simulations: a randomized prospective study. Nurse Educ Pract. 2021[citado em 2022 jun. 30];51(3):102914. Disponível em https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2020.102914
Yin RK. Estudo de Caso: planejamento e métodos. 5ª ed. Porto Alegre: Bookman; 2015. 290 p.
Freire P. Pedagogia do oprimido. São Paulo: Paz e Terra; 2019.
Minayo MCS. Sampling and saturation in qualitative research: consensuses and controversies. Rev Pesq Qual. 2017[citado em 2022 mar. 07];5(7):1-12. Disponível em: https://editora.sepq.org.br/index.php/rpq/article/view/82/59
Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. IJQHC. 2007[citado em 2022 mar. 07];19(6):349-57. Disponível em: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/intghc/mzm042
Teles MG, Mendes-Castillo AMC, Oliveira-Kumakura ARS, Silva JLG. Simulação clínica no ensino de Enfermagem pediátrica: percepção de estudantes. Rev Bras Enferm. 2020[citado em 2022 mar. 09];73(2):e20180720. Disponível em: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2018-0720
Cockerham ME. Effect of faculty training on improving the consistency of student assessment and debriefing in clinical simulation. Clin Simul Nurs. 2015[citado em 2022 mar. 09];11(1):64-71. Disponível em: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2014.10.011
Rosa CTW, Rosa AW. Aprendizagem autorreguladora: aportes teóricos para subsidiar a educação científica. Res Soc Dev. 2020[citado em 2022 mar. 09];9(1):1-20. Disponível em: http://dx.doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v9i1.1633
Boostel R. Stress of nursing students in clinical simulation: a randomized clinical trial. Rev Bras Enferm. 2018[citado em 2022 mar. 08];71(3):967-74. Disponível em: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2017-0187
Bortolato-Major C, Mantovani MF, Felix JVC, Boostel R, Mattei AT, Arthur JP, et al. Autoconfiança e satisfação dos estudantes de Enfermagem em simulação de emergência. REME - Rev Min Enferm. 2020[citado em 2022 mar. 14];24:e-1336. Disponível em: http://10.5935/1415.2762.20200073
Goncalves SAT. Sentimentos estressores em estudantes de Enfermagem no processo de ensino-aprendizagem utilizando a simulação realística: uma revisão de escopo [dissertação]. Alfenas: Universidade José do Rosário Vellano; 2021. 52p.
Mota LM, Santos ALF, Wyszomirska RM. Assessment of cognitive knowledge associated with debriefing in realistic simulation. Res Soc Dev. 2022[citado em 2022 mar. 14];11(3):e38811326583. Disponível em: https: http://10.33448/rsd-v11i3.26583
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 REME-Revista Mineira de Enfermagem
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Links
Facebook
Instagram
Twitter
