Science Education in Urban Peripheries: A Review of Science Teaching in Contexts of Social Vulnerability (1985–2018)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.28976/1984-2686rbpec2020u221243Keywords:
Urban science education, Popular class, Color, Race and Racism, MinoritiesAbstract
The main objective of this work is to present an international and national review of articles on scientific education in urban peripheries. Taking as a starting point two revisions covering the period from 1985 to 2013, we expanded them until the year 2018, looking for articles published in national and international journals with the highest impact factor. As a result, we realized that recent literature (2014–2018) can be grouped into three major coexisting perspectives (traditional, critical and post-critical), described by 11 research topics. At the same time that contemporary perspectives emerge vigorously in the literature, traditional perspectives, inspired by technical rationality and efficiency, have never become outdated. The analysis also made it possible to conjecture the low occurrence of articles on scientific education in urban peripheries in Brazilian journals. We then discuss implications for science education.
Downloads
References
Althusser, L. (2013). Ideologias e Aparelhos Ideológicos de Estado. Ed. Contraponto.
Apple, M. (1982). Ideologia e currículo. Ed. Brasiliense.
Archer, L., Dawson, E., Seakins, A., & Wong, B. (2016). Disorientating, fun or meaningful? Disadvantaged families’ experiences of a science museum visit. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 11(4), 917–939. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-015-9667-7
Aschbacher, P. R., Ing, M., & Tsai, S. M. (2014). Is Science Me? Exploring Middle School Students’ STE-M Career Aspirations. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 23(6), 735–743. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-014-9504-x
Ball, C. (2017). Pressurizing the STEM Pipeline: an Expectancy-Value Theory Analysis of Youths ’ STEM Attitudes. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 26(4), 372–382. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-017-9685-1
Barton, A. C. (2002). Urban science education studies: A commitment to equity , social justice and a sense of place. Studies in Sciene Education, 38(1), 37–41.
Bardin, L. (1977). Análise de conteúdo. Edições 70.
Bauman, Z. (2001). Modernidade Líquida. Jorge Zahar.
Beck, U. (2010). Sociedade de risco: Rumo a uma outra modernidade. Tradução de Sebastião Nascimento. Ed. 34. 1986.
Beckett, G. H., Hemmings, A., Maltbie, C., Wright, K., Sherman, M., & Sersion, B. (2016). Erratum to: Urban High School Student Engagement through CincySTEM iTEST Projects. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(6), 1008–1008. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-016-9668-7
Belle, H. B. M. (2011). Escola de Civismo e Cidadania: ethos do Colégio Beta da Polícia Militar de Goiás. Tese. Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Goiás. http://tede2.pucgoias.edu.br:8080/handle/tede/3787
Bernstein, B. A (1996). A estruturação do discurso pedagógico: classe, códigos e controle. Vozes.
Berland, M., & Wilensky, U. (2015). Comparing Virtual and Physical Robotics Environments for Supporting Complex Systems and Computational Thinking. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 24(5), 628–647 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-015-9552-x
Bobbitt, J. F. (2004). O currículo. Didática.
Bodzin, A. M., & Fu, Q. (2013). The Effectiveness of the Geospatial Curriculum Approach on Urban Middle-Level Students’ Climate Change Understandings. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 23(4), 575–590. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-013-9478-0
Bodzin, A. M., Fu, Q., Kulo, V., & Peffer, T. (2014). Examining the Effect of Enactment of a Geospatial Curriculum on Students ’ Geospatial Thinking and Reasoning. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 23 (4), 562–574. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-014-9488-6
Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J. C. (1970/2016). A reprodução: elementos para uma teoria do sistema de ensino. Tradução Reynaldo Bairão. Ed. Vozes.
Bressler, D. M. (2016). Investigating Flow Experience and Scientific Practices During a Mobile Serious Educational Game. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(5), 795–805. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-016-9639-z
Brkich, K. L. (2013). Urban fifth graders’ connections-making between formal earth science content and their lived experiences. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 9(1), 141–164. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-013-9505-8
Butler, J. (2003) Problemas de gênero: feminismo e subversão da identidade. Tradução de Renato Aguiar. Civilização Brasileira.
Carpi, A., Ronan, D. M., Falconer, H. M., & Lents, N. H. (2016). Cultivating Minority Scientists: Undergraduate Research Increases Self-Efficacy and Career Ambitions for Underrepresented Students in STEM. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 54(2), 169–194. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21341
Chapman, A., & Feldman, A. (2016). Cultivation of science identity through authentic science in an urban high school classroom. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 12(2), 469–491. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-015-9723-3
Chen, S., Chang, W., Lai, C., Tsai, C., & Al, C. E. T. (2014). Education A Comparison of Students ’ Approaches to Inquiry , Conceptual Learning , and Attitudes in Simulation-Based and Microcomputer-Based Laboratories. Science Education, 98(5), 905–935. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21126
Connors-kellgren, A., Parker, C. E., Blustein, D. L., & Barnett, M. (2016). Innovations and Challenges in Project-Based STEM Education: Lessons from ITEST. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(6), 825–832. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-016-9658-9
Coleman, J. S., Campbell, E. Q., Hobson, C. J., McPartland, J., Mood, A. M., Weinfeld, F. D., & York, R. L. (1966). Equality of Educational Opportunity. US Department of Health, Education & Welfare. Office of Education (OE-38001 and supp.), 548 p.
Davis, N. R., Ingber, J., & McLaughlin, C. A. (2014). Leveraging complex understandings of urban education for transformative science pedagogy. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 9(4), 925–934. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-014-9609-9
De Carvalho, R. (2016). Science initial teacher education and superdiversity: educating science teachers for a multi-religious and globalised science classroom. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 11(2), 253–272. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-015-9671-y
Deleuze, G. (1992). Conversações. (Tradução. Peter Pál Pelbart). Ed. 34.
Derrida, J. (2009). A escritura e a diferença. Perspectiva.
Dika, S. L., & Amico, M. M. D. (2016). Early Experiences and Integration in the Persistence of First-Generation College Students in STEM and Non-STEM Majors, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(3), 368–383. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21301.
Duran, M., Höft, M., Lawson, D. B., Medjahed, B., & Orady, E. A. (2014). Urban High School Students’ IT/STEM Learning: Findings from a Collaborative Inquiry-and Design-Based Afterschool Program. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 23(1), 116–137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-013-9457-5
Eisenhart, M., Weis, L., Allen, C. D., Cipollone, K., & Stich, A. (2015). High School Opportunities for STEM: Comparing Inclusive STEM-Focused and Comprehensive High Schools in Two US Cities, Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 52(6), 763–769. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21213
Fellner, G. (2014). The problem is education not “special education.” Cultural Studies of Science Education, 10(4), 1089–1101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-013-9559-7
Freire, P. (2008). Pedagogia do Oprimido. Ed. Paz e Terra.
Foucault, M. (2002) A arqueologia do saber. Trad. Luiz Felipe Baeta Neves. Editora Forense Universitária.
Ganhor, J. P. (2019). O Rap na Educação Científica e Tecnológica Rap. Ciência & Educação 25(1), 163–180.
Guerra, A., & Rezende, F. (2016). Sociocultural influences on science and on science identities. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 12(2), 505–511. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-016-9771-3
Giroux, H. (2001) “Praticando estudos culturais nas faculdades de educação”. In T. T. da Silva, (Org.). Alienígenas em sala de aula: uma introdução aos estudos culturais em educação. Vozes. pp. 85–103.
González-Howard, M., & McNeill, K. L. (2016). Learning in a community of practice: Factors impacting english-learning students’ engagement in scientific argumentation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(4), 527–553. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21310
Hale, C. (2014). Urban special education policy and the lived experience of stigma in a high school science classroom. Cultural Studies of Science Education. 10(4), 1071–1088. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-013-9548-x
Harris, C. J., Penuel, W. R., Angelo, C. M. D., Debarger, A. H., Gallagher, L. P., Kennedy, C. A.,… & Krajcik, J. S. (2015). Impact of Project-Based Curriculum Materials on Student Learning in Science: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial, 52(10), 1362–1385. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21263
Kane, J. M. (2016). Young African American Boys Narrating Identities in Science, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(1), 95–118. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21247
Kubo, O. M., & Botomé, S. P. (2001). Uma interação entre dois processos comportamentais. Interação Em Psicologia, 5(1). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.5380/psi.v5i1.3321
Kwah, H., Milne, C., Tsai, T., Goldman, R., & Plass, J. L. (2014). development of an afterschool game design curriculum. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 11(3), 713–740. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-014-9621-0
Lowan-Trudeau, G. (2016). Gateway to understanding: Indigenous ecological activism and education in urban, rural, and remote contexts. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 12(1), 119–128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-016-9746-4
Maulucci, S. R., Brown, B. A., Grey, S. T., & Sullivan, S. (2014). Urban Middle School Students ’ Reflections on Authentic Science Inquiry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(9), 1119–1149. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21167
McLaughlin, C. A. (2014). Urban science education: examining current issues through a historical lens. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 9(4), 885–923. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-014-9598-8
Morales-doyle, D. (2017). Justice-centered science pedagogy: A catalyst for academic achievement and social transformation. Science Education, 101(6), 1034–1060. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21305
Mulvey, B. K., Chiu, J. L., Ghosh, R., & Bell, R. L. (2016). Special Education Teachers’ Nature of Science Instructional Experiences. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(4), 554–578. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21311
Paleari, L. M., & Biz, A. C. (2010). Imagens em Narrativa: contraposição cultural e interdisciplinaridade no ensino fundamental pictures in narrative: cultural counterpoint and interdisciplinarity in Secondary Education. Ciência & Educação,16(2), 491–506.
Paprzycki, P., Tuttle, N., Czerniak, C. M., Molitor, S., Kadervaek, J., & Mendenhall, R. (2017). The Impact of a Framework-Aligned Science Professional Development Program on Literacy and Mathematics Achievement of K-3 Students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 54(9), 1174–1196. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21400
Parker, C. (2014). Multiple influences: Latinas , middle school science. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 9(2), 317–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-014-9573-4
Price, C. A., & Malatesta, H. L. K. (2014). Stereoscopy in Static Scientific Imagery in an Informal Education Setting: Does It Matter? Journal of Science Education and Technology, 23(6), 721–734. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-014-9500-1
Rancière, J. (2005/2014). O ódio à democracia. 1. Ed. Boitempo.
Ramnarain, U. (2016). Understanding the Influence of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Factors on Inquiry-Based Science Education at Township Schools in South Africa. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(4), 598–619. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21315
Sant’Anna, I. M. Por que avaliar?: como avaliar?: critérios e instrumentos. 12. Ed. Vozes, 1995.
Schindel Dimick, A. (2016). Exploring the Potential and Complexity of a Critical Pedagogy of Place in Urban Science Education. Science Education, 100(5), 814–836. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21233
Silva, T. T. (1999). Documentos de Identidade: uma introdução às teorias de currículo. Autênctica Editora LTDA.
Shady, A. (2013). Negotiating cultural differences in urban science education: an overview of teacher’s first-hand experience reflection of cogen journey. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 9(1), 31–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-013-9486-7
Soares, M. H. F., Silva, M. V. B., & Cavalheiro, E. T. G. (2001). Aplicação de corantes naturais no ensino médio. Eclética Química, 26 (1), 225–234. https://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-46702001000100017
Stuckey, M., Hofstein, A., Mamlok-Naaman, R., & Eilks, I. (2013). The meaning of “relevance” in science education and its implications for the science curriculum. Studies in Science Education, 49(1), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2013.802463
Swanson, L. H., Bianchini, J. A., & Lee, J. S. (2014). Engaging in argument and communicating information: A case study of english language learners and their science teacher in an urban high school. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(1), 31–64. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21124
Tyler, R. (1983). Princípios Básicos de currículo e ensino, Porto Alegre: Ed. Globo.
Tolbert, S., & Bazzul, J. (2016). Toward the sociopolitical in science education. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 12(2), 321–330. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-016-9737-5
Varelas, M., Pieper, L., Arsenault, A., & Pappas, C. C. (2014). How Science Texts and Hands-On Explorations Facilitate Meaning Making: Learning From Latina / o Third Graders. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(10), 1246–1274. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21173
Wallace, E. W., Perry, J. C., Ferguson, R. L., & Jackson, D. K. (2014). The Careers in Health and Medical Professions Program ( CHAMPS ): An Impact Study of a University-Based STEM + H Outreach Program. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 24(4), 484–495. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-014-9536-2
Walls, L. (2016). Equitable research: a bridge too far? Cultural Studies of Science Education, 12(2), 493–503. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-016-9770-4
Wenner, J. A., & Settlage, J. (2015). School Leader Enactments of the Structure / Agency Dialectic Via Buffering. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(4), 503–515. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21212
Whitesell, E. R. (2016). Research Article A Day at the Museum: The Impact of Field Trips on Middle School Science Achievement. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(7), 1036–1054. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21322
Wyner, Y., & Doherty, J. H. (2017). Developing a learning progression for three-dimensional learning of the patterns of evolution. Science Education, 101(5), 787–817. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21289
Zhang, L., Barnett, M., Wassell, B., Kate, Æ. S., Tan, E., Calabrese, Æ. A., … Maulucci, M. S. R. (2016). Leveraging complex understandings of urban education for transformative science pedagogy. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 6(2), 469–491. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-013-9546-z
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The authors are responsible for the veracity of the information provided and for the content of the papers.
The authors who publish in this journal fully agree with the following terms:
- The authors attest that the work is unpublished, that is, it has not been published in another journal, event notices or equivalent.
- The authors attest that they did not submit the paper to another journal simultaneously.
- The authors retain the copyright and grant to RPBEC the right of first publication, with the work licensed simultaneously under a Creative Commons Attribution License, which allows the sharing of the work with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- The authors attest that they own the copyright or the written permission from copyright owners of figures, tables, large texts, etc. that are included in the paper.
- Authors are authorized to take additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (for example, to publish in institutional repository or as a book chapter), with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) after the publication in order to increase the impact and citation of published work.
In case of identification of plagiarism, inappropriate republishing and simultaneous submissions, the authors authorize the Editorial Board to make public what happened, informing the editors of the journals involved, any plagiarized authors and their institutions of origin.